In terms of the rise of anti-semitism, the only solution I can see is Netanyahu's ending the Palestinian genocide. We have not had active anti-Semitism for years, but the whole world is crying out against the horrors Netanyahu is inflicting on Gaza, and some unstable people are launching attacks at the nearest targets.
People are missing the mark on that one...
With or without Netanyahu, Palestinians would still be attacking Israelis, and the prevailing attitudes in the region are still inherently antisemitic.
Prime Minister Rabin was arguably the most "Palestinian-sympathetic" PM in Israel's history.
What happened to Israel during his tenure?
Is the way Netanyahu is handling thing incorrect? I'd say so... but his handling of the situation is just being used as an excuse for the thing they'd want to do anyway.
That's why I mentioned in another thread.
The "anti-Netanyahu" movement, shouldn't be a "pro-Palestinian" movement. It caused ideologies to blur together.
The same way an "anti-Crips" movement shouldn't turn into a "pro-Bloods" movement.
We, as a nation, seem to have lost our ability to recognize nuance and criticize one extreme entity, without glorifying whoever their rival happens to be.
Take this example:
Say some radical person/group firebombed the Westboro Baptist Church. Would the appropriate way to condemn the act of firebombing be for counter protestors to start flying the Westboro flag or chanting their slogans?
Like I also mentioned in the other thread, this isn't the WWE, not every conflict had a cleanly delineated "good guy vs. bad guy".
Sometimes it's "really bad guy vs. even worse guy"...and we do ourselves a disservice if we cheer on the former simply because they're a little less bad than the latter.