Noah way?

[Shemjaza]

"Creation Scientist" is a contradiction in terms.

Agreed as tasks and activities... but as separate labels they can absolutely apply to an individual.

 

[David Lamb]

"Creation Scientist" is a contradiction in terms.

Why? Are you saying that people who believe in Creation cannot be scientists? Those scientists associated with Creationist organisations such as "Answers in Genesis" would disagree, as would I.

 

[Aaron112]

"Creation Scientist" is a contradiction in terms.

So it seems is "Christian Forums" by the same logic ?

 

[Aaron112]

People look at everything "under the sun," then end up vexed when someone brings up a miracle.

I've seen more multitudes vexed terribly whenever(often) someone quote Scripture or presents a simple fact exposing man's idolatry worldwide.

What does it mean to come out from among them (2 Corinthians 6:17)? | GotQuestions.org there is no fellowship between the temple of God and idols,

then the Christian should have nothing to do with idol worship:

“For we are the temple of the living God” (2 Corinthians 6:16).

Then to further support the idea that Christians are the temple of God,
Paul quotes from Leviticus 26:12, which is also alluded to in Jeremiah 32:38 and Ezekiel 37:27:

“I will live with them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they will be my people” (2 Corinthians 6:16).

The temple of God is where God dwells, and He says He will dwell among His people, making them the temple."


"little children, avoid all idols"

 

[Aaron112]

Scientifically, there is significant counter evidence for a recent world wide flood.

Not recent. The last and only worldwide flood was a few thousand years ago, exactly as
Described in sufficient detail in God's Newspaper.

 

[Aaron112]

I would say Post 7 nails this thread.

Yawn, really? All of Genesis eliminates needing anything at all, everything, every purpose, of this thread; almost of this whole forum.

 

[Shemjaza]

Not recent. The last and only worldwide flood was a few thousand years ago, exactly as
Described in sufficient detail in God's Newspaper.

That's recent.

The scientific evidence against that being true is overwhelming.

As I always say, it is trivial to imagine an omnipotent God miraculously flooding the world, then reworking the environment into a completely different structure... but it left no physical evidence.

 

[AV1611VET]

Why? Are you saying that people who believe in Creation cannot be scientists? Those scientists associated with Creationist organisations such as "Answers in Genesis" would disagree, as would I.

I understand that there are Christians who are scientists who study God's creation.

And in that vein, they would be creation [studying] scientists.

But ... if they want to apply what they are studying back to the Creation Week, then I'm going to have to call them on it.

Science has nothing to do with the Creation Week, as the creation week involved a series of one miracle after another after another.

And I don't agree with their terminology.

It's misleading, in my opinion.

 

[AV1611VET]

So it seems is "Christian Forums" by the same logic ?

No.

 

[AV1611VET]

Yawn, really? All of Genesis eliminates needing anything at all, everything, every purpose, of this thread; almost of this whole forum.

Then feel free to tell us how the animals got back to their points of origination after the Flood.

 

[AV1611VET]

As I always say, it is trivial to imagine an omnipotent God miraculously flooding the world, then reworking the environment into a completely different structure... but it left no physical evidence.

What you call "reworking the environment," I like to call "cleaning up His mess."

 

[FredVB]

I think there are just different things looked at as evidence. This does not mean there is claim of knowledge about how long ago things happened, from what is found.

Noah's way was not with having animals killed for food, but for when the ark was left there was hardly anything around to eat, God then permitted what would come into their hand they could kill for preparing, to have food they needed, just after all the blood was removed. Blood from creatures was not permitted. For that matter, neither were mushrooms.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I think there are just different things looked at as evidence. This does not mean there is claim of knowledge about how long ago things happened, from what is found.

Noah's way was not with having animals killed for food, but for when the ark was left there was hardly anything around to eat, God then permitted what would come into their hand they could kill for preparing, to have food they needed, just after all the blood was removed. Blood from creatures was not permitted. For that matter, neither were mushrooms.

That's not even remotely close to what the OP topic of the thread is about.

 

[BeyondET]

What you call "reworking the environment," I like to call "cleaning up His mess."

Hmm God is messy?

 

[AV1611VET]

Hmm God is messy?

I'd say so.

 

[BeyondET]

I'd say so.

Then you think He isn't perfect either, there is no perfection in a mess.

 

[FredVB]

That's not even remotely close to what the OP topic of the thread is about.

I think it was, I answer things I can. What specifically was asked I do not have an answer for. So what. I have the answer for how the universe started, you atheists do not.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I think it was, I answer things I can. What specifically was asked I do not have an answer for. So what. I have the answer for how the universe started, you atheists do not.

I'm a deist, so check that first of all.

And secondly... no, none of what you said had anything to do with the OP topic in the slightest.

 

[AV1611VET]

... there is no perfection in a mess.

You don't play chess, do you?

 

[FredVB]

I'm a deist, so check that first of all.

And secondly... no, none of what you said had anything to do with the OP topic in the slightest.

Regardless...
You are with those who argue against God being relevant to anything about evolution. That there is no explanation for the universe being started other than unlimited necessary existence that is eternal and showing intelligence and caring, which would rightly be called God, means that there is such involvement with design even in any evolution happening. Atheism does not have an answer for that, with any logic. What I posted is an answer that can be given, so if I can't have a thought out answer to the original question about placement of animals, so what? It is really smaller potatoes.

If it desired that I just make guesses to explain placement of animals for being considered relevant I could do so, but why should that be? Are guesses really wanted? There is no vested interest there.