The Argument for Universal Reconciliation from the Book of Romans

[BelieveItOarKnot]

Support you position without inserting "age," "ages," "the age," "the next age" in any text that they do not occur in.

What makes you think I support temporary hell? I don't

The devil and his messengers will end up there forever, no question

 

[Der Alte]

What makes you think I support temporary hell? I don't

The devil and his messengers will end up there forever, no question

Perhaps you need to reread my post again."Support your position without inserting "age," "ages," "the age," "the next age" in any text that they do not occur in."

 

[BelieveItOarKnot]

Perhaps you need to reread my post again."Support your position without inserting "age," "ages," "the age," "the next age" in any text that they do not occur in."

What's your point in the above?

You think universalists are wrong in their sights of some scriptures showing various ages, and these not eternal?

They're right in that observation. They're only wrong in applying it to the LoF

 

[Der Alte]

What's your point in the above?

Many of the posts I have made were dismissed by someone saying e.g. "that only applies to this 'age' not the next."

You think universalists are wrong in their sights of some scriptures showing various ages, and these not eternal?

Only when they try to refute something that counters UR by by inserting age/ages when it does not occur in the text.

They're right in that observation. They're only wrong in applying it to the LoF

Scripture?

 

[BelieveItOarKnot]

Many of the posts I have made were dismissed by someone saying e.g. "that only applies to this 'age' not the next."

Universalists have varied opinions just like all other sects

Only when they try to refute something that counters UR by by inserting age/ages when it does not occur in the text.

Never has been an issue for me and other universalists