I noticed that you ignored the rest of the scripture that I presented in the OP, yet again.
However, let me help you with your misunderstanding of Israel.
1.)
(CLV) Mt 15:24
Now He, answering, said, "I was not commissioned except for the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
2.)
Paul drives that message home.
Ephesians 2
11 Wherefore, remember that once you, the nations (Gentiles) in flesh - who are termed 'Uncircumcision' by those termed 'Circumcision,' in flesh, made by hands -"
Hi Hark. Hope all is well.
I have questions concerning this Scripture. Isn't Paul speaking to "Gentiles" who have "Yielded themselves" or as Isaiah says, "Joined themselves" to the Lord? And who is calling them "The Uncircumcised"? Was it not the religious sect of the Pharisees who were called "The Circumcision"? It doesn't say here, "Wherefore,
remember that once you, the nations (Gentiles) in flesh - who are termed 'Uncircumcision' by
those termed 'Circumcision,'
"God", in flesh, made by hands -
These Gentile members of God's Church were called outsiders by the mainstream preachers of that time. Not by God, in my understanding. According to the Holy Words of God, these men who were once strangers, were to be considered as "home born" according to Moses.
Not anymore!
12 that you were, in that era, apart from Christ, being alienated from the citizenship of Israel, and guests of the promise covenants, having no expectation, and without God in the world."
When were Strangers who "Joined themselves to the Lord", ever considered by God as "being
alienated from the citizenship of Israel,"? The commandments of men the Pharisees, AKA, "the Circumcision" taught for doctrines, promoted this philosophy. But not God, in my view.
Is. 56:
6 And the sons of the foreigner obligated to Yahweh to minister to Him, and to love the name of Yahweh, to become His servants, and everyone keeping from violating My sabbath, and holding fast My covenant,
7 I bring them also to My holy mountain, and I make them rejoice in My house of prayer.
Not anymore!
13 Yet now, in Christ Jesus, you, who once are far off, are become near by the blood of Christ."
Consider Col. 2 which speaks to this exact same thing.
Col. 2:
13 Who rouses Him from among the dead, you also being dead to the offenses
and the uncircumcision of your flesh, He vivifies us together jointly with Him, dealing graciously with all our offenses,
14 erasing "the handwriting of the decrees against us", which was "hostile to us", and has taken it away out of the midst, nailing it to the cross,
15 stripping off the sovereignties and authorities, (This isn't speaking about God's Law or Authority, is it?) with boldness
He makes a show of them, (This isn't Yeshua boldly "making a show of His Father's "Anti-Paul and Gentile" commandments, is it?)
triumphing "over them" in it." (Yeshua didn't triumph over "His Father" on the Cross, did He?)
I have long questioned the popular interpretations of this verse promoted by this world's religious sects and businesses. Yeshua said "
24 Now He, answering, said, "I was not commissioned except for the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
Why were the sheep lost? Was it not because the Priests (Fathers of the Pharisees and scribes) corrupted God's Priesthood covenant with Levi?
Mal. 2:
7 For the lips of a priest shall keep knowledge, and the law shall they seek from his mouth,
for the messenger of Yahweh of hosts is he."
8 Yet you withdraw from the way.
You cause many to stumble at the law. You ruin the covenant of Levi, says Yahweh of hosts."
9 And, moreover, I make you despised and low to all the people,
according as you are not keeping My ways, yet you lift up faces in the law."
Wasn't it the Shepherds who led Israel astray?
Jer. 50:
6 A perishing flock has My people been,
Their shepherds have caused them to err, [To] the mountains causing them to go back, From mountain unto hill they have gone, They have forgotten their crouching-place.
From these and other Scriptures, it seems Yeshua exposed the corrupted "Jews Religion" that taught for doctrines the Commandments of men, that Paul was Zealous for and blameless in.
What are your thoughts on this understanding?