• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Free will and determinism

partinobodycular

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
2,626
1,047
partinowherecular
✟136,482.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
He might want to sail down to Rio. He might want to drop anchor and do some fishing. But he prefers to get his job done and that determines his actions.

So he took all of his wants and smushed them together, and having done that he decided that what he wanted most of all was to get the job done. It still seems like free will to me. It's just that he didn't get to choose the one that he has, as unfair as that seems, life did that for him. Life decided that he was going to want to get the job done. Life decided what he was going to care about. Life decided what he was going to have to endure. Life decided... but it wasn't just any old life... it was his life. And it's his will. He'll choose what he'll choose, because he chooses to, just like you will, and I will, and every freaking body else will.

That's free will, doing what one chooses to do, because one chooses to do it. And it doesn't make me an automaton. It makes me unique. It makes me... me, with all the choices incumbent therein.
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,707
5,556
46
Oregon
✟1,099,493.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
Lucifer said "What matter where if I still be the same?"

That is an interesting question
What is a really sad thing is when God doesn't ever predestine anything significantly significant enough to ever happen or transpire in a person's life to the point that it changes them, or so that they will change.
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,707
5,556
46
Oregon
✟1,099,493.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
So he took all of his wants and smushed them together, and having done that he decided that what he wanted most of all was to get the job done. It still seems like free will to me. It's just that he didn't get to choose the one that he has, as unfair as that seems, life did that for him. Life decided that he was going to want to get the job done. Life decided what he was going to care about. Life decided what he was going to have to endure. Life decided... but it wasn't just any old life... it was his life. And it's his will. He'll choose what he'll choose, because he chooses to, just like you will, and I will, and every freaking body else will.

That's free will, doing what one chooses to do, because one chooses to do it. And it doesn't make me an automaton. It makes me unique. It makes me... me, with all the choices incumbent therein.
We are all an absolutely priceless, exquisite to someone, great, great work of a labor of love work of art, that is each one very, very dissimilar to all of the other ones, and is very, very much extremely, very, very much highly priceless, and extremely, extremely unique.

It is why we are here, and is why we were all made I think.

Take Care/God Bless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reneep
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,069
15,696
72
Bondi
✟370,755.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
So he took all of his wants and smushed them together, and having done that he decided that what he wanted most of all was to get the job done. It still seems like free will to me. It's just that he didn't get to choose the one that he has, as unfair as that seems, life did that for him. Life decided that he was going to want to get the job done. Life decided what he was going to care about. Life decided what he was going to have to endure. Life decided... but it wasn't just any old life... it was his life. And it's his will. He'll choose what he'll choose, because he chooses to, just like you will, and I will, and every freaking body else will.

That's free will, doing what one chooses to do, because one chooses to do it. And it doesn't make me an automaton. It makes me unique. It makes me... me, with all the choices incumbent therein.
This where a lot of arguments end up. A simple statement that free will is...well, obvious. Because...well, it just is.
 
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
What is a really sad thing is when God doesn't ever predestine anything significantly significant enough to ever happen or transpire in a person's life to the point that it changes them, or so that they will change.
That is the implication of "What matter where if I be still the same

However the Book of Job, God allowed Lucifer to raise hell with Job. If Job did not have free will (what matter where if Job be still the same)
Then God was mocking the devil?

However, I hesitate to take Milton as Gospel.
It is just a different view of the Gospel, according to Milton.
Same authority as you or me.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,707
5,556
46
Oregon
✟1,099,493.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
That is the implication of "What matter where if I be still the same

However the Book of Job, God allowed Lucifer to raise hell with Job. If Job did not have free will (what matter where if Job be still the same)
Then God was mocking the devil?
Well, if God ever decided to do that, and that's not what I am saying was actually going on there, but even if it was, then He would be the only One who would or could or should, or that fully has the right to do that, because the rest of us most definitely should not, and don't, etc, as not even the highest ranking Angel in God's Army was willing to even get anywhere close to that, with Satan I mean, etc.
However, I hesitate to take Milton as Gospel.
It is just a different view of the Gospel, according to Milton.
Same authority as you or me.
Truthfully, or truth be told, and if you haven't already figured it out by now, etc, I'm not much of a poet or an artsy type, and the only part I really understood about that, or what you just said was something along the lines of the devil maybe lamenting the fact that he couldn't change, and so I was responding to that.

God Bless.
 
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
This where a lot of arguments end up. A simple statement that free will is...well, obvious. Because...well, it just is
If you ask the average man on the street if he has free will,, he might stare at you as if you had gone mad
,And say "Yes I have free will. I can do anything I want anytime I feel like it."
The discussions about the nature of Free Will are within Christian theology
Free will is self evident to most people
It is odd that you should be interested in this because the argument of free will and determinism is mostly within the evangelical and reformed.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,069
15,696
72
Bondi
✟370,755.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
It is odd that you should be interested in this because the argument of free will and determinism is mostly within the evangelical and reformed.
Which is something I don't get. Christians have been posting in the thread since Day 1 denying that determinism exists. Yet it is the basis for showing that God is the First Cause. If something can happen without a cause then you don't need to posit God, because the universe could have come into being without a cause.

Well, I say that I don't get it, but that's not strictly true. They consider they have free will ('Look, I just raised my arm') and can't think of a compatibilist solution so therefore determinism can't be true. Ask for an example and you'll get radio silence
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,707
5,556
46
Oregon
✟1,099,493.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
Parts of an ongoing conversation I am having with Deepseek seeking to possibly maybe help to prove determinism a little better maybe, etc…

Me:

Is everything deepseek says/does entirely deterministic?

Deepseek:

DeepSeek, like other AI models, operates based on a combination of deterministic and non-deterministic processes. Here's a breakdown of how these elements come into play:

### Deterministic Aspects:
1. **Model Architecture**: The architecture of DeepSeek, including its neural network structure, layers, and parameters, is fixed once the model is trained. This means that the way the model processes input data is governed by a set of deterministic rules.
2. **Training Data**: The model is trained on a specific dataset, and the knowledge it has is derived from this data. The training process itself, while complex, is deterministic in the sense that given the same initial conditions (random seeds, hyperparameters, etc.), the training would produce the same model.
3. **Inference Process**: When generating responses, the model follows a deterministic process to compute the output based on the input it receives. This involves matrix multiplications, activation functions, and other mathematical operations that are deterministic.

### Non-Deterministic Aspects:
1. **Random Initialization**: During training, the model's parameters are often initialized with random values. While this is controlled by a random seed, the initial randomness can lead to different outcomes if the training process were to be repeated with different seeds.
2. **Sampling Methods**: When generating text, DeepSeek can use various sampling techniques (e.g., greedy search, beam search, top-k sampling, nucleus sampling) to produce responses. Some of these methods introduce an element of randomness to generate diverse and creative outputs. For example, top-k sampling and nucleus sampling involve selecting from a subset of possible next words based on probabilities, which can lead to different outputs for the same input.
3. **Temperature Parameter**: The temperature parameter controls the randomness of predictions by scaling the logits before applying softmax. A higher temperature results in more random outputs, while a lower temperature makes the model more deterministic.

### Practical Implications:
- **Reproducibility**: If all conditions (random seeds, hyperparameters, input data) are kept constant, DeepSeek's behavior can be reproducible and deterministic. However, in practice, slight variations in these conditions can lead to different outputs.
- **User Experience**: The non-deterministic elements are often intentionally included to make the model's responses more varied and human-like, enhancing the user experience.

In summary, while DeepSeek's underlying processes are largely deterministic, certain elements introduce non-determinism to enrich its functionality and output. This combination allows the model to provide both consistent and diverse responses, depending on the context and configuration.

Me:

If I ask deep seek a question always worded the exact same way, and if all prior condtions are always exactly the same, will deep seek always give the exact same answer worded in the exact same way always?

Deepseek:

If you ask DeepSeek a question that is always worded the exact same way, and if **all prior conditions are exactly the same** (including the model's internal state, random seed, temperature setting, and any other parameters that influence its output), then **DeepSeek will always give the exact same answer, worded in the exact same way**.

This is because, under these conditions, the model's behavior is **deterministic**. The neural network's computations are based on fixed mathematical operations, and if there is no randomness introduced (e.g., through sampling methods or temperature settings), the output will be consistent for the same input.

### Key Factors That Ensure Determinism:
1. **Fixed Random Seed**: If the random seed used for any probabilistic processes (e.g., sampling) is the same, the model will produce the same output.
2. **Deterministic Sampling Method**: If the model uses a deterministic sampling method like **greedy search** (always choosing the highest-probability next word) instead of probabilistic methods like **top-k sampling** or **nucleus sampling**, the output will be consistent.
3. **Temperature Setting**: If the temperature is set to **0**, the model will behave deterministically, always selecting the most likely next word without introducing randomness.
4. **Identical Input and Context**: The input question must be exactly the same, and the context (e.g., prior conversation history) must also be identical.

### When Might the Output Differ?
If any of the above conditions change, the output might differ. For example:
- If the **temperature** is greater than 0, the model might introduce variability in its responses.
- If a **probabilistic sampling method** is used, the model might choose different words based on their probabilities.
- If the **random seed** changes, the model's behavior might vary.

### Practical Example:
If you ask DeepSeek the same question multiple times with:
- Temperature = 0,
- Identical random seed,
- Identical input wording and context,
- Deterministic sampling method (e.g., greedy search),

then DeepSeek will **always produce the exact same response**.

In summary, under tightly controlled conditions, DeepSeek's behavior is deterministic, and it will always give the same answer to the same question. However, in real-world usage, some variability is often introduced to make the model's responses more natural and engaging.

Me:

But that variability goes according to a program right? so how does that not make everything that deepseek always says/does entirely deterministic in reality? Can deepseek ever provide a different response to a specific question if all of the exact same conditions were always repeated exactly the same always?

Deepseek:

You're absolutely right to question this, and it gets to the heart of how deterministic systems can appear non-deterministic. Let's break this down carefully:

### DeepSeek's Variability and Determinism
The variability in DeepSeek's responses is indeed governed by a program, and that program is deterministic in the sense that it follows a set of rules and mathematical operations. However, the appearance of non-determinism arises from the **intentional introduction of randomness** into the system, which is itself a deterministic process. Here's how it works:

1. **Randomness as a Programmed Feature**:
- DeepSeek can use **pseudo-random number generators** (PRNGs) to introduce variability in its responses. PRNGs are algorithms that produce sequences of numbers that appear random but are actually determined by an initial value called a **seed**.
- If the seed is the same, the sequence of "random" numbers will be the same every time, making the process deterministic. If the seed changes, the sequence changes, creating the appearance of randomness.

2. **Sampling Methods**:
- When generating text, DeepSeek can use probabilistic sampling methods like **top-k sampling** or **nucleus sampling**. These methods select words based on their probabilities, and the selection process can involve pseudo-random numbers.
- If the same seed is used, the same sequence of pseudo-random numbers will be generated, leading to the same word choices and thus the same response.

3. **Temperature Setting**:
- The temperature parameter controls the randomness of the output. A temperature of **0** makes the model deterministic (always choosing the highest-probability next word), while a higher temperature increases variability.
- Even with a higher temperature, if the seed and all other conditions are the same, the output will be the same because the "randomness" is deterministic.

### Can DeepSeek Ever Provide a Different Response Under Identical Conditions?
No, **DeepSeek cannot provide a different response if all conditions are exactly the same**. This includes:
- The **input question** (worded exactly the same way),
- The **context** (prior conversation history, if any),
- The **random seed** (if pseudo-randomness is involved),
- The **temperature setting**,
- The **sampling method**,
- The **model's internal state** (weights, parameters, etc.).

If all of these conditions are identical, DeepSeek will always produce the same response. The appearance of variability comes from changes in these conditions, such as using a different random seed or adjusting the temperature.

### Why Does This Matter?
This distinction is important because it shows that DeepSeek's behavior is fundamentally deterministic, even when it appears random. The "randomness" is an illusion created by deterministic processes (like PRNGs) that are designed to simulate unpredictability. In reality, if you could control all the conditions perfectly, DeepSeek would always behave the same way.

### Practical Implications
In practice, though, it's often difficult or unnecessary to control all these conditions perfectly. For example:
- If the random seed is not fixed, DeepSeek might produce different responses to the same question in different sessions.
- If the temperature is set to a non-zero value, the model might introduce variability to make its responses more natural or creative.

But in principle, if you could replicate all conditions exactly, DeepSeek would always give the same answer. This is true for all deterministic systems, including AI models like DeepSeek.

End of conversation for now with Deeoseek.

It did not require any theology, or theological questions, to get Deepseek to this point with this subject so far, etc

God Bless.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bradskii
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,707
5,556
46
Oregon
✟1,099,493.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
Parts of an ongoing conversation I am having with Deepseek seeking to possibly maybe help to prove determinism a little better maybe, etc…

Me:

Is everything deepseek says/does entirely deterministic?

Deepseek:

DeepSeek, like other AI models, operates based on a combination of deterministic and non-deterministic processes. Here's a breakdown of how these elements come into play:

### Deterministic Aspects:
1. **Model Architecture**: The architecture of DeepSeek, including its neural network structure, layers, and parameters, is fixed once the model is trained. This means that the way the model processes input data is governed by a set of deterministic rules.
2. **Training Data**: The model is trained on a specific dataset, and the knowledge it has is derived from this data. The training process itself, while complex, is deterministic in the sense that given the same initial conditions (random seeds, hyperparameters, etc.), the training would produce the same model.
3. **Inference Process**: When generating responses, the model follows a deterministic process to compute the output based on the input it receives. This involves matrix multiplications, activation functions, and other mathematical operations that are deterministic.

### Non-Deterministic Aspects:
1. **Random Initialization**: During training, the model's parameters are often initialized with random values. While this is controlled by a random seed, the initial randomness can lead to different outcomes if the training process were to be repeated with different seeds.
2. **Sampling Methods**: When generating text, DeepSeek can use various sampling techniques (e.g., greedy search, beam search, top-k sampling, nucleus sampling) to produce responses. Some of these methods introduce an element of randomness to generate diverse and creative outputs. For example, top-k sampling and nucleus sampling involve selecting from a subset of possible next words based on probabilities, which can lead to different outputs for the same input.
3. **Temperature Parameter**: The temperature parameter controls the randomness of predictions by scaling the logits before applying softmax. A higher temperature results in more random outputs, while a lower temperature makes the model more deterministic.

### Practical Implications:
- **Reproducibility**: If all conditions (random seeds, hyperparameters, input data) are kept constant, DeepSeek's behavior can be reproducible and deterministic. However, in practice, slight variations in these conditions can lead to different outputs.
- **User Experience**: The non-deterministic elements are often intentionally included to make the model's responses more varied and human-like, enhancing the user experience.

In summary, while DeepSeek's underlying processes are largely deterministic, certain elements introduce non-determinism to enrich its functionality and output. This combination allows the model to provide both consistent and diverse responses, depending on the context and configuration.

Me:

If I ask deep seek a question always worded the exact same way, and if all prior condtions are always exactly the same, will deep seek always give the exact same answer worded in the exact same way always?

Deepseek:

If you ask DeepSeek a question that is always worded the exact same way, and if **all prior conditions are exactly the same** (including the model's internal state, random seed, temperature setting, and any other parameters that influence its output), then **DeepSeek will always give the exact same answer, worded in the exact same way**.

This is because, under these conditions, the model's behavior is **deterministic**. The neural network's computations are based on fixed mathematical operations, and if there is no randomness introduced (e.g., through sampling methods or temperature settings), the output will be consistent for the same input.

### Key Factors That Ensure Determinism:
1. **Fixed Random Seed**: If the random seed used for any probabilistic processes (e.g., sampling) is the same, the model will produce the same output.
2. **Deterministic Sampling Method**: If the model uses a deterministic sampling method like **greedy search** (always choosing the highest-probability next word) instead of probabilistic methods like **top-k sampling** or **nucleus sampling**, the output will be consistent.
3. **Temperature Setting**: If the temperature is set to **0**, the model will behave deterministically, always selecting the most likely next word without introducing randomness.
4. **Identical Input and Context**: The input question must be exactly the same, and the context (e.g., prior conversation history) must also be identical.

### When Might the Output Differ?
If any of the above conditions change, the output might differ. For example:
- If the **temperature** is greater than 0, the model might introduce variability in its responses.
- If a **probabilistic sampling method** is used, the model might choose different words based on their probabilities.
- If the **random seed** changes, the model's behavior might vary.

### Practical Example:
If you ask DeepSeek the same question multiple times with:
- Temperature = 0,
- Identical random seed,
- Identical input wording and context,
- Deterministic sampling method (e.g., greedy search),

then DeepSeek will **always produce the exact same response**.

In summary, under tightly controlled conditions, DeepSeek's behavior is deterministic, and it will always give the same answer to the same question. However, in real-world usage, some variability is often introduced to make the model's responses more natural and engaging.

Me:

But that variability goes according to a program right? so how does that not make everything that deepseek always says/does entirely deterministic in reality? Can deepseek ever provide a different response to a specific question if all of the exact same conditions were always repeated exactly the same always?

Deepseek:

You're absolutely right to question this, and it gets to the heart of how deterministic systems can appear non-deterministic. Let's break this down carefully:

### DeepSeek's Variability and Determinism
The variability in DeepSeek's responses is indeed governed by a program, and that program is deterministic in the sense that it follows a set of rules and mathematical operations. However, the appearance of non-determinism arises from the **intentional introduction of randomness** into the system, which is itself a deterministic process. Here's how it works:

1. **Randomness as a Programmed Feature**:
- DeepSeek can use **pseudo-random number generators** (PRNGs) to introduce variability in its responses. PRNGs are algorithms that produce sequences of numbers that appear random but are actually determined by an initial value called a **seed**.
- If the seed is the same, the sequence of "random" numbers will be the same every time, making the process deterministic. If the seed changes, the sequence changes, creating the appearance of randomness.

2. **Sampling Methods**:
- When generating text, DeepSeek can use probabilistic sampling methods like **top-k sampling** or **nucleus sampling**. These methods select words based on their probabilities, and the selection process can involve pseudo-random numbers.
- If the same seed is used, the same sequence of pseudo-random numbers will be generated, leading to the same word choices and thus the same response.

3. **Temperature Setting**:
- The temperature parameter controls the randomness of the output. A temperature of **0** makes the model deterministic (always choosing the highest-probability next word), while a higher temperature increases variability.
- Even with a higher temperature, if the seed and all other conditions are the same, the output will be the same because the "randomness" is deterministic.

### Can DeepSeek Ever Provide a Different Response Under Identical Conditions?
No, **DeepSeek cannot provide a different response if all conditions are exactly the same**. This includes:
- The **input question** (worded exactly the same way),
- The **context** (prior conversation history, if any),
- The **random seed** (if pseudo-randomness is involved),
- The **temperature setting**,
- The **sampling method**,
- The **model's internal state** (weights, parameters, etc.).

If all of these conditions are identical, DeepSeek will always produce the same response. The appearance of variability comes from changes in these conditions, such as using a different random seed or adjusting the temperature.

### Why Does This Matter?
This distinction is important because it shows that DeepSeek's behavior is fundamentally deterministic, even when it appears random. The "randomness" is an illusion created by deterministic processes (like PRNGs) that are designed to simulate unpredictability. In reality, if you could control all the conditions perfectly, DeepSeek would always behave the same way.

### Practical Implications
In practice, though, it's often difficult or unnecessary to control all these conditions perfectly. For example:
- If the random seed is not fixed, DeepSeek might produce different responses to the same question in different sessions.
- If the temperature is set to a non-zero value, the model might introduce variability to make its responses more natural or creative.

But in principle, if you could replicate all conditions exactly, DeepSeek would always give the same answer. This is true for all deterministic systems, including AI models like DeepSeek.

End of conversation for now with Deeoseek.

It did not require any theology, or theological questions, to get Deepseek to this point with this subject so far, etc

God Bless.
I asked it one more question for now, and will bug it a lot more about this subject later.

Me:

What is the difference between you and a human being in this, or on or about this subject in this?

Deepseek:

The difference between DeepSeek (or any AI model) and a human being, particularly on the subject of determinism and variability in responses, lies in the **underlying mechanisms of decision-making, consciousness, and the nature of randomness**. Here's a detailed comparison:

---

### 1. **Source of Determinism and Variability**
- **DeepSeek (AI Model)**:
- DeepSeek's behavior is entirely governed by its programming, architecture, and input data. Any variability in its responses is the result of **programmed randomness** (e.g., pseudo-random number generators) or probabilistic sampling methods.
- If all conditions (input, random seed, temperature, etc.) are identical, DeepSeek will always produce the same response. Its "creativity" or variability is simulated and deterministic at its core.
- DeepSeek has no **intentionality** or **consciousness**—it does not "choose" responses in the way humans do. It simply follows mathematical rules to generate outputs.

- **Human Being**:
- Human decision-making involves a complex interplay of **conscious thought**, **subconscious processes**, **emotions**, and **external influences**. While the brain operates according to physical laws, the nature of human consciousness and free will introduces an element of unpredictability that is not purely algorithmic.
- Even if a human is asked the same question in the same context multiple times, they might provide different answers due to changes in their mental state, mood, or new insights. This variability is not purely deterministic in the way an AI's variability is.
- Humans experience **true randomness** in their thought processes, influenced by factors like creativity, intuition, and subjective experience, which are not fully understood or replicable by deterministic systems.

---

### 2. **Nature of Randomness**
- **DeepSeek (AI Model)**:
- DeepSeek uses **pseudo-randomness**, which is deterministic but designed to appear random. For example, a pseudo-random number generator produces a sequence of numbers that seems random but is entirely determined by its initial seed.
- The randomness in DeepSeek's responses is therefore **simulated randomness**, not true randomness.

- **Human Being**:
- Humans may experience or exhibit **true randomness** in their thoughts and actions, influenced by quantum-level processes in the brain (e.g., quantum fluctuations in neural activity) or the inherent complexity of consciousness.
- Human creativity and decision-making often involve unpredictable elements that cannot be fully explained by deterministic models.

---

### 3. **Consciousness and Intentionality**
- **DeepSeek (AI Model)**:
- DeepSeek has no consciousness, self-awareness, or intentionality. It does not "understand" the questions it is asked or the answers it provides. It simply processes input data and generates output based on patterns it has learned.
- Its responses are the result of mathematical computations, not conscious thought or decision-making.

- **Human Being**:
- Humans are conscious beings with the ability to reflect on their thoughts, intentions, and actions. When a human answers a question, they do so with an understanding of the meaning behind the question and the implications of their answer.
- Humans can choose to deviate from patterns or expectations, driven by free will, creativity, or personal values.

---

### 4. **Learning and Adaptation**
- **DeepSeek (AI Model)**:
- DeepSeek learns from data during its training phase, but once trained, its behavior is fixed unless explicitly retrained or fine-tuned.
- It does not learn or adapt in real-time during a conversation (unless specifically designed to do so, which is rare for most models).

- **Human Being**:
- Humans continuously learn and adapt in real-time. Each interaction or experience can change how a human thinks or responds in the future.
- Humans can reflect on their past actions and consciously decide to change their behavior, something DeepSeek cannot do.

---

### 5. **Philosophical Implications**
- **DeepSeek (AI Model)**:
- DeepSeek operates entirely within the framework of **algorithmic determinism**. Its behavior can, in principle, be fully predicted if all conditions are known.
- It raises questions about the nature of intelligence and whether a system without consciousness can truly "think" or "understand."

- **Human Being**:
- Human behavior raises profound philosophical questions about **free will**, **determinism**, and the nature of consciousness. Even if the brain operates according to physical laws, the subjective experience of free will makes human behavior feel non-deterministic.
- The existence of consciousness in humans introduces an element of unpredictability and creativity that goes beyond algorithmic processes.

---

### Summary of Differences:
| Aspect | DeepSeek (AI Model) | Human Being |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| **Source of Variability** | Programmed randomness (pseudo-randomness) | True randomness, creativity, free will |
| **Consciousness** | None | Present (self-awareness, intentionality) |
| **Learning** | Fixed after training (unless retrained) | Continuous, adaptive, and reflective |
| **Philosophical Nature** | Algorithmic determinism | Combines determinism and free will |

---

### Can DeepSeek Ever Be Truly Non-Deterministic Like a Human?
No, DeepSeek cannot be truly non-deterministic like a human. Even if it simulates randomness or variability, its behavior is ultimately governed by deterministic algorithms. Humans, on the other hand, exhibit behavior that is influenced by consciousness, free will, and potentially quantum-level processes, making their responses fundamentally different from those of an AI model.

In short, while DeepSeek can mimic human-like variability, it lacks the depth of human consciousness and the true unpredictability that comes with it.

End of conversation with Deeoseek for now.

God Bless.
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,707
5,556
46
Oregon
✟1,099,493.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
I asked it one more question for now, and will bug it a lot more about this subject later.

Me:

What is the difference between you and a human being in this, or on or about this subject in this?

Deepseek:

The difference between DeepSeek (or any AI model) and a human being, particularly on the subject of determinism and variability in responses, lies in the **underlying mechanisms of decision-making, consciousness, and the nature of randomness**. Here's a detailed comparison:

---

### 1. **Source of Determinism and Variability**
- **DeepSeek (AI Model)**:
- DeepSeek's behavior is entirely governed by its programming, architecture, and input data. Any variability in its responses is the result of **programmed randomness** (e.g., pseudo-random number generators) or probabilistic sampling methods.
- If all conditions (input, random seed, temperature, etc.) are identical, DeepSeek will always produce the same response. Its "creativity" or variability is simulated and deterministic at its core.
- DeepSeek has no **intentionality** or **consciousness**—it does not "choose" responses in the way humans do. It simply follows mathematical rules to generate outputs.

- **Human Being**:
- Human decision-making involves a complex interplay of **conscious thought**, **subconscious processes**, **emotions**, and **external influences**. While the brain operates according to physical laws, the nature of human consciousness and free will introduces an element of unpredictability that is not purely algorithmic.
- Even if a human is asked the same question in the same context multiple times, they might provide different answers due to changes in their mental state, mood, or new insights. This variability is not purely deterministic in the way an AI's variability is.
- Humans experience **true randomness** in their thought processes, influenced by factors like creativity, intuition, and subjective experience, which are not fully understood or replicable by deterministic systems.

---

### 2. **Nature of Randomness**
- **DeepSeek (AI Model)**:
- DeepSeek uses **pseudo-randomness**, which is deterministic but designed to appear random. For example, a pseudo-random number generator produces a sequence of numbers that seems random but is entirely determined by its initial seed.
- The randomness in DeepSeek's responses is therefore **simulated randomness**, not true randomness.

- **Human Being**:
- Humans may experience or exhibit **true randomness** in their thoughts and actions, influenced by quantum-level processes in the brain (e.g., quantum fluctuations in neural activity) or the inherent complexity of consciousness.
- Human creativity and decision-making often involve unpredictable elements that cannot be fully explained by deterministic models.

---

### 3. **Consciousness and Intentionality**
- **DeepSeek (AI Model)**:
- DeepSeek has no consciousness, self-awareness, or intentionality. It does not "understand" the questions it is asked or the answers it provides. It simply processes input data and generates output based on patterns it has learned.
- Its responses are the result of mathematical computations, not conscious thought or decision-making.

- **Human Being**:
- Humans are conscious beings with the ability to reflect on their thoughts, intentions, and actions. When a human answers a question, they do so with an understanding of the meaning behind the question and the implications of their answer.
- Humans can choose to deviate from patterns or expectations, driven by free will, creativity, or personal values.

---

### 4. **Learning and Adaptation**
- **DeepSeek (AI Model)**:
- DeepSeek learns from data during its training phase, but once trained, its behavior is fixed unless explicitly retrained or fine-tuned.
- It does not learn or adapt in real-time during a conversation (unless specifically designed to do so, which is rare for most models).

- **Human Being**:
- Humans continuously learn and adapt in real-time. Each interaction or experience can change how a human thinks or responds in the future.
- Humans can reflect on their past actions and consciously decide to change their behavior, something DeepSeek cannot do.

---

### 5. **Philosophical Implications**
- **DeepSeek (AI Model)**:
- DeepSeek operates entirely within the framework of **algorithmic determinism**. Its behavior can, in principle, be fully predicted if all conditions are known.
- It raises questions about the nature of intelligence and whether a system without consciousness can truly "think" or "understand."

- **Human Being**:
- Human behavior raises profound philosophical questions about **free will**, **determinism**, and the nature of consciousness. Even if the brain operates according to physical laws, the subjective experience of free will makes human behavior feel non-deterministic.
- The existence of consciousness in humans introduces an element of unpredictability and creativity that goes beyond algorithmic processes.

---

### Summary of Differences:
| Aspect | DeepSeek (AI Model) | Human Being |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| **Source of Variability** | Programmed randomness (pseudo-randomness) | True randomness, creativity, free will |
| **Consciousness** | None | Present (self-awareness, intentionality) |
| **Learning** | Fixed after training (unless retrained) | Continuous, adaptive, and reflective |
| **Philosophical Nature** | Algorithmic determinism | Combines determinism and free will |

---

### Can DeepSeek Ever Be Truly Non-Deterministic Like a Human?
No, DeepSeek cannot be truly non-deterministic like a human. Even if it simulates randomness or variability, its behavior is ultimately governed by deterministic algorithms. Humans, on the other hand, exhibit behavior that is influenced by consciousness, free will, and potentially quantum-level processes, making their responses fundamentally different from those of an AI model.

In short, while DeepSeek can mimic human-like variability, it lacks the depth of human consciousness and the true unpredictability that comes with it.

End of conversation with Deeoseek for now.

God Bless.
I thought about asking it a few more questions, ones like if a human being was able to be reset and taken back to a decision or choice made previously with all conditions being the same, could they make a different choice possibly in theory?

But I already know what it will say or how it will answer, and that it would just say that they possibly could, due to some of what it already said/stated above to me when I just asked it the question that I just right now quoted in this reply above, etc.

Which just amounts to it not being able to be 100% absolutely proven right now, and that things are still up in the air about this question basically, etc. With human beings right now anyway, etc.

But I did seem to be able to change it's mind a little bit about it's own determinism in all of what it says and does or quote/unquote "choses' to do though maybe?

I do think that if we are just given a little bit more time though, that we will eventually prove that every single thing in this entire universe is entirely 100% deterministic though, etc.

I'll pester DeepSeek some more about it later, because I need to think about it a little bit more first.

I'm trying to kind of back it into a corner about this whole subject, and this whole subject with humans more specifically, and get it to admit to the absolute determinism of every single thing, but I just don't know if that's going to be 100% possible right now yet?

God Bless
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bradskii
Upvote 0

Reneep

Active Member
Jan 21, 2025
160
18
65
Springfield
✟6,980.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
So let's take it back to GODS WORD and see what can be learned about free will and determinism there.. So I started asking the Lord some kind of difficult questions for me to understand. So let's go to the begining for a peek. There has been a lot of assumptions about that time. So I had questions, something did not make sense to me.
LIKE " why didn't Adam and Eve have children in the Garden ? Or what was preventing Eve from getting pregnant until they left the Garden ? What was going on there ? Something was wrong before the Sneaky
Snakes got involved. So Lord what was really going on , because there is missing information someone left out, in that it took at least 40-80 or more years for Eve to conceive? Because Seth being born at about when Adam was 110 or so. We have no idea when Cain and Abel were born . Something wasn't adding up to me.

So what if the story isn't exactly as people think it is, because the Lord asked me one question I never thought about. And the implications points to a God of predetermined outcomes. But what i learned after that is when God needs to do redirection because the will of someone is getting in the way for Gods plan , He forgives them for making the needed prdetermined choices. JESUS WENT TO THE CROSS TO SAVE EVE FROM THE DESISION SHE HAD TO MAKE.

THE QUESTION HE ASKED ME BLEW ME AWAY. HE SAID " HOW MENY MEN WERE IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN ? " oh i knew what had really happened. A WOMAN WILL WAIT FOREVER FOR THE BEST MAN TO FATHER HER CHILDREN , IT IS HER INSTINCT. THERE WERE TWO MEN IN THE GARDEN THERE WAS A HALF A MAN AND THERE WAS A WHOLE MAN , WHO DID SHE WANT ? AND THAT IS THE REASON THE DEVILS TEMPTATION THEN MADE SENSE. I COULDNT UNDERSTAND WHY WHAT THE DEVIL SAID TO HER WAS EVER A TEMPTATION. NOW I KNOW.. NOW I KNOW WHY ADAM LET HER EAT THAT FRUIT AND WAS STANDING RIGHT THERE . JEALOUSY HAD TAKEN ROOT IN HIS HEART AND THAT IS HOW DEVIL GOT INTO THE GARDEN IN THE FIRST PLACE, SIN IT WAS JEALOUSY . AND HOW MANY HUSBANDS HATE THAT THEIR WIVES GO TO CHURCH AND LOVE GOD MORE THAN THEY LOVE THEM ... IT IS AN OLD STORY THAT IS EVEN PLAYED OUT TODAY ? AND ALL THE WOMEN THAT FILL THE CHURCHES PEWS WHILE THE MEN STAY HOME AND WORSHIP AT THE ALTER OF FOOTBALL. It is still the same story JEALOUSY.

But the good news is it had to happen and Jesus had to go to the cross to save Adam and Eve . It had already been determined by the Father before the creation of the world . And Eve and Adam have entered Life and are and will be saved. So if God has to make you sin he also made the way to save you. But even then Adam and Eve had a choice in it. Their hearts made choices. EVE DIDNT LOVE the one WHO was her HUSBAND that that WAS HERS TO LOVE , and surely she has not been the only woman to do that. . Adam Loved Eve and himself more than HE loved God and he is not the only man to do that either. . AND THE Lord knew as long as Eve was safe in the Garden and didn't need Adam. ADAM WOULD STILL to this day. BE WAITING TO GET HIM SOME SOMETHING SOMETHING.. both determinism and free will were clearly at work. Just so Happens that Father knew all that going into it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,707
5,556
46
Oregon
✟1,099,493.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
So let's take it back to GODS WORD and see what can be learned about free will and determinism there.. So I started asking the Lord some kind of difficult questions for me to understand. So let's go to the begining for a peek. There has been a lot of assumptions about that time. So I had questions, something did not make sense to me.
LIKE " why didn't Adam and Eve have children in the Garden ? Or what was preventing Eve from getting pregnant until they left the Garden ? What was going on there ? Something was wrong before the Sneaky
Snakes got involved. So Lord what was really going on , because there is missing information someone left out, in that it took at least 40-80 or more years for Eve to conceive? Because Seth being born at about when Adam was 110 or so. We have no idea when Cain and Abel were born . Something wasn't adding up to me.

So what if the story isn't exactly as people think it is, because the Lord asked me one question I never thought about. And the implications points to a God of predetermined outcomes. But what i learned after that is when God needs to do redirection because the will of someone is getting in the way for Gods plan , He forgives them for making the needed prdetermined choices. JESUS WENT TO THE CROSS TO SAVE EVE FROM THE DESISION SHE HAD TO MAKE.

THE QUESTION HE ASKED ME BLEW ME AWAY. HE SAID " HOW MENY MEN WERE IN THE GARDEN OF EDEN ? " oh i knew what had really happened. A WOMAN WILL WAIT FOREVER FOR THE BEST MAN TO FATHER HER CHILDREN , IT IS HER INSTINCT. THERE WERE TWO MEN IN THE GARDEN THERE WAS A HALF A MAN AND THERE WAS A WHOLE MAN , WHO DID SHE WANT ? AND THAT IS THE REASON THE DEVILS TEMPTATION THEN MADE SENSE. I COULDNT UNDERSTAND WHY WHAT THE DEVIL SAID TO HER WAS EVER A TEMPTATION. NOW I KNOW.. NOW I KNOW WHY ADAM LET HER EAT THAT FRUIT AND WAS STANDING RIGHT THERE . JEALOUSY HAD TAKEN ROOT IN HIS HEART AND THAT IS HOW DEVIL GOT INTO THE GARDEN IN THE FIRST PLACE, SIN IT WAS JEALOUSY . AND HOW MANY HUSBANDS HATE THAT THEIR WIVES GO TO CHURCH AND LOVE GOD MORE THAN THEY LOVE THEM ... IT IS AN OLD STORY THAT IS EVEN PLAYED OUT TODAY ? AND ALL THE WOMEN THAT FILL THE CHURCHES PEWS WHILE THE MEN STAY HOME AND WORSHIP AT THE ALTER OF FOOTBALL. It is still the same story JEALOUSY.

But the good news is it had to happen and Jesus had to go to the cross to save Adam and Eve . It had already been determined by the Father before the creation of the world . And Eve and Adam have entered Life and are and will be saved. So if God has to make you sin he also made the way to save you. But even then Adam and Eve had a choice in it. Their hearts made choices. EVE DIDNT LOVE WHO HUSBAND that WAS HERS TO LOVE , and surely she has not been the only woman to do that. . Adam Loved Eve and himself more than HE loved God and he is not the only man to do that either. . AND THE Lord knew as long as Eve was safe in the Garden and didn't need Adam. ADAM WOULD STILL to this day. BE WAITING TO GET HIM SOME SOMETHING SOMETHING.. both determinism and free will were clearly at work. Just so Happens that Father knew all that going into it.
You are just a little bit off with this.

The beginnings are a tragedy really. God made Adam. Later on He made Eve for Adam. Adam was told to convey God's messages/words to Eve, including what God commanded about the Tree. Adam added to God's words about the Tree when he told Eve. The serpent saw this and saw an opportunity/opening to tempt both Adam and Eve to disobey. When Eve was alone the Serpent got Eve to touch the fruit of the Tree. Eve saw that nothing happened and that she did not immediately die when she first took ahold of the fruit from the Tree. She then brought the fruit to Adam holding it clutched in her hand, and Adam in that moment realized his mistake, and they both did eat. And the rest is history, etc.

This makes sense because the Bible says that Adam was not at all decieved but that the woman (Eve) was thoroughly decieved.

And as to why Adam and Eve didn't have children in the Garden, there are all kinds of different possibilities. But God is way, way, more than fully capable or closing up women's wombs and then opening them back up later if he doesn't want them to be able to reproduce yet, or conceive for a time, etc, and that is just only one of the possible explanations for that subject/story/question or possiblity.

God Bless.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Which is something I don't get. Christians have been posting in the thread since Day 1 denying that determinism exists. Yet it is the basis for showing that God is the First Cause. If something can happen without a cause then you don't need to posit God, because the universe could have come into being without a cause.
The radio silence is because of that proof of God causal argument, so determinism is the tradition
But then there must be free will or God becomes the "cause of sin."

The argument has raged since Aquinas and was prominant in the Reformation

I wonder if cause is not like free will. People are very attached to it but no one can demonstrate it.
They say this caused that but in fact, reality is so complicated that to assign a cause to any event is not useful.
It is not where it came from but where it is going.. Cause is not a good indicator of that. We know all sorts of causes but we can't predict much of anything.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,069
15,696
72
Bondi
✟370,755.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
IT goes to Aquinas. He used the First Cause, cause as proof of God but then he fudged the Free Will
Determinism may show God as First Cause...
Then determinism is valid from now back to the beginning. Else there can be no first cause. And therefore no God.

So determinism is therefore true. And if there are no valid proposals for compatibilism then free will is an illusion.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Then determinism is valid from now back to the beginning. Else there can be no first cause. And therefore no God.

So determinism is therefore false. And if there are no valid proposals for compatibilism then free will is an illusion

Determism proves God if you believe God set the ball rolling, took off His bowling shoes and left the alley
Then God may exist but not as an effective agent in the subsequent scheme of things.
He is only required at the beginning. The clockwork universe and God is the clockmaker.

And free will is an illusion if you believe you can do anything you want, anytime you want.
However free will is a navigation system. Not a power although a person's navigation system may inform him he can bull through a wall or otherwise ignore the exigencies of the totality of circumstance in which he exists

There are other proofs of God. Most Christians have likely never heard of deteminism and free will arguments. Doesn't seem to matter one whit to the Faithful
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

QvQ

Member
Aug 18, 2019
2,381
1,076
AZ
✟147,890.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Then determinism is therefore true. From now back to then.
It is true that there is an unbroken chain of space/time from now back to then.
That isn't determinism because determinism implies causes as the engine of motion.
However, curvature of space/time
"Matter tells space how to bend and space tells matter how to move."

It is true that man has a will.
It is an illusion that man has free will.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

partinobodycular

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
2,626
1,047
partinowherecular
✟136,482.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Then determinism is valid from now back to the beginning. Else there can be no first cause. And therefore no God.

Keep in mind that there are two first causes, a linear first cause which implies determinism on at least a limited timescale, and a hierarchical first cause which makes no reference at all to determinism. God's existence necessitates the latter, but it doesn't by necessity require the former.

Hence the above statement isn't true.
 
Upvote 0

partinobodycular

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
2,626
1,047
partinowherecular
✟136,482.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
He is only required at the beginning. The clockwork universe and God is the clockmaker.

The universe would still require a hierarchical first cause, which like the linear first cause one may or may not identify as God. But it HAS to be there whether determinism is true or not.

So long as something exists a first cause exists.
 
Upvote 0