Show us where it is restricted to "citizens" in the constitution or any subsequent court rulling.
8 U.S. Code § 1325 - Improper entry by alien
(a)Improper time or place; avoidance of examination or inspection; misrepresentation and concealment of facts
Any alien who (1) enters or attempts to enter the United States at any time or place other than as designated by immigration officers, or (2) eludes examination or inspection by immigration officers, or (3) attempts to enter or obtains entry to the United States by a willfully false or misleading representation or the willful concealment of a material fact, shall, for the first commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18 or imprisoned not more than 6 months, or both, and, for a subsequent commission of any such offense, be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 2 years, or both.
(b)Improper time or place; civil penalties
Any alien who is apprehended while entering (or attempting to enter) the United States at a time or place other than as designated by immigration officers shall be subject to a civil penalty of—
(1)at least $50 and not more than $250 for each such entry (or attempted entry); or
(2)twice the amount specified in paragraph (1) in the case of an alien who has been previously subject to a civil penalty under this subsection.
Civil penalties under this subsection are in addition to, and not in lieu of, any criminal or other civil penalties that may be imposed.
PROTECTING THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AGAINST INVASION By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of
www.whitehouse.gov
And, just for your side, since you don't differentiate between "citizens" and "people", in the Constitution, when it is to your advantage:
What constitutional rights do undocumented immigrants have?
No public servant "welcomed illegals".
If a posted 55 mph is not enforced, it invites higher speed. Add to that, that the South American mindset, common to "3rd world countries", is that written laws are enforced 'on the spot' according to preference of the officials enforcing. It is a game, in other words, though serious. I lived there, this is not just opinion. Listening to the opinions of liberal after liberal in public office, yes —they invited them and were glad to have them. I call that, "welcomed illegals".
What do you call "sanctuary cities"?
'“We urge you to act decisively between now and the inauguration of the President-elect to complete the important work of the past four years and protect immigrant families,” they wrote.' Wonder why they keep talking about 'immigrants' and not 'illegal immigrants' —can it be that they don't know the difference?
https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/11/politics/joe-biden-immigration-donald-trump/index.html
I'm hoping you haven't forgotten the constant back and forth about whether-or-not to defend them once they are here. Are you so naïve as to believe that improving their lives here is not to invite others to come?
I heard Pelosi even wanted drinking fountains installed in the desert, to ease their passage. (Yes, I know, I have no citation. Funny, that.)