Trump to Take Down the Left-Wing Censorship Cabal

[Yarddog]

That's your opinion.

Nope. An opinion is a judgement or view not necessarily based on facts.

 

[HARK!]

And there is the problem. You refuse to ever look at the facts. You have eyes but refuse to see. You have ears but refuse to hear.

I started to read the article; but I grew weary of all of the propaganda.

If your assertion holds any water; you should be able to back it up with a direct quote.

If you can't; I understand.

 

[HARK!]

Nope. An opinion is a judgement or view not necessarily based on facts.

So far you're short on facts. Propaganda isn't facts.

I look forward to Trump and team pulling federal funding for NPR.

I'm offended that I'm paying for that hackery.

 

[KCfromNC]

I don't want to sift through all of the propaganda from that Left-Wing deep state mouthpiece.

Who specifically did Trump threaten? What specifically was the threat?

Quote please.

Posts which ignore evidence after previous posts pretended that it was very important don't really lend to credibility.

 

[Yarddog]

So far you're short on facts. Propaganda isn't facts.

I look forward to Trump and team pulling federal funding for NPR.

View attachment 357487

I'm offended that I'm paying for that hackery.

I agree. Propaganda isn't facts. Like "They're eating the dogs!" But I'm not short on facts. I listen to what Trump says. What he says is propaganda but quoting that propaganda is fact.

 

[Yarddog]

I started to read the article; but I grew weary of all of the propaganda.

If your assertion holds any water; you should be able to back it up with a direct quote.

If you can't; I understand.

And again you show reveal the problem that many Americans have. Too lazy to read an article. Newspapers know that most people don't read more than the first paragraph or two. So, many right wing news sources say what they want their readers to believe in the headline, which mostly contains false info and then put the correct stuff further back in the article, knowing their readers won't get that far.

The article that I gave you began telling what Trump had said and he couldn't legally do those things. They provided links which took you to the speech in which Trump made the statements but you admitted that you couldn't get that far. Imagine that.

 

[Yarddog]

I don't want to sift through all of the propaganda from that Left-Wing deep state mouthpiece.

Who specifically did Trump threaten? What specifically was the threat?

Quote please.

You're not interested in the facts. You just want a narrative that fits into your belief in Trump's lies.

 

[HARK!]

Posts which ignore evidence after previous posts pretended that it was very important don't really lend to credibility.

Propaganda does not qualify as evidence.

 

[HARK!]

I agree. Propaganda isn't facts. Like "They're eating the dogs!" But I'm not short on facts. I listen to what Trump says. What he says is propaganda but quoting that propaganda is fact.

I'm still waiting for you to quote Trump to back up your claim.

You keep coming up empty handed.

 

[HARK!]

And again you show reveal the problem that many Americans have. Too lazy to read an article. Newspapers know that most people don't read more than the first paragraph or two. So, many right wing news sources say what they want their readers to believe in the headline, which mostly contains false info and then put the correct stuff further back in the article, knowing their readers won't get that far.

The article that I gave you began telling what Trump had said and he couldn't legally do those things. They provided links which took you to the speech in which Trump made the statements but you admitted that you couldn't get that far. Imagine that.

I'm not interested in your propaganda. I'm still waiting for you to quote Trump and back it up with a link to support your claim.

So far you're failing.

 

[HARK!]

You're not interested in the facts. You just want a narrative that fits into your belief in Trump's lies.

This is an example of projection; and ad hominem rolled into one.

The fact is that you are still failing to back up your claim with a quote. Trolling my thread does not fulfill that request.

 

[HARK!]

Feds blew $267M fighting ‘misinformation’ during the COVID-19 pandemic under Biden — as Trump vows to ban ‘censorship cartel’​

WASHINGTON — The federal government spent up to $267 million of your money to study and counteract so-called “misinformation” since President Biden took office in January 2021 — as President-elect Donald Trump vows to bar official use of the term.


The funds doled out to universities, nonprofits and private companies spiked from $2.2 million in 2020, the final full year of Trump’s first term, to a staggering $126 million in 2021 before tapering off — even as leading US public health officials were imposing mandates they later admitted had no scientific basis — the taxpayer-transparency group OpenTheBooks said in a report released Friday.

Feds blew $267M fighting ‘misinformation’ during the COVID-19 pandemic under Biden — as Trump vows to ban ‘censorship cartel’

Universities, nonprofits and private companies raked in $126 million in 2021 alone, the taxpayer-transparency group OpenTheBooks revealed in an audit, to research so-called “misinformation,&#…

nypost.com

 

[HARK!]

HHS also authorized grants that paid for outfits to monitor social media for vaccine and other medical information contradicting the department’s preferred narratives.

Biden spent big to fight contrary narratives; ‘misinformation’ on virus, climate

The Biden administration has spent more than a quarter of a billion dollars to study and police “misinformation,” according to a report released Friday.

www.washingtontimes.com

 

[Yarddog]

This is an example of projection; and ad hominem rolled into one.

The fact is that you are still failing to back up your claim with a quote. Trolling my thread does not fulfill that request.

I see that you don't know what ad hominem means or what projection in an argument is. And I didn't fail to provide the quote,you just refuse to read the article that I provided you.

 

[KCfromNC]

Propaganda does not qualify as evidence.

Could be, but given previous posts admitted to not reading the links it seems strange that follow up posts imply things about the content of the links.

 

[HARK!]

Could be, but given previous posts admitted to not reading the links it seems strange that follow up posts imply things about the content of the links.

But I did read the link. It was full of propaganda.

 

[DaisyDay]

And again you show reveal the problem that many Americans have. Too lazy to read an article. Newspapers know that most people don't read more than the first paragraph or two. So, many right wing news sources say what they want their readers to believe in the headline, which mostly contains false info and then put the correct stuff further back in the article, knowing their readers won't get that far.

The article that I gave you began telling what Trump had said and he couldn't legally do those things. They provided links which took you to the speech in which Trump made the statements but you admitted that you couldn't get that far. Imagine that.

Horse, water.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

And there is the problem. You refuse to ever look at the facts. You have eyes but refuse to see. You have ears but refuse to hear.

I have read the article and what I heard were a lot of liberal journalist whining and having meltdowns because Trump won and people are not buying into their nonsense. It reminded me of those liberal meltdown compilations that are going viral on the internet.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

Horse, water.

Dog water?

 

[Oompa Loompa]

So far you're short on facts. Propaganda isn't facts.

I look forward to Trump and team pulling federal funding for NPR.

View attachment 357487

I'm offended that I'm paying for that hackery.

MSNBC will become DogeCast.