Ethics of anti evolution arguments

[Astrid]

Ignorance goes a long way in excusing this for me.

But at some point the ignorance often becomes willful, and thats when the bad faith discussion starts. Its difficult to generalize about when that threshold gets crossed.

Many on this forum cross it, deep into bad faith..



The thread is for themm.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Many on this forum cross it, deep into bad faith..



The thread is for themm.

It's kind of about them...

 

[Astrid]

It's kind of about them...

Close enuf

 

[Larniavc]

No known fact proves it.

What known fact proves anything?

 

[Larniavc]

However, on TOE, No.

There may be a few non religious objections in the research base; do you have a link for the one that convinced you that evolution does not happen?

 

[Larniavc]

the crocodile

They have changed massively over history. Some crocodilians had hooves, some stood upright, some were herbivores.

Did you honestly not know that?

 

[essentialsaltes]

I can't access the link.

Assuming you clicked the link, what then ensued?

 

[o_mlly]

There are several hypotheses why can organisms stay in their form for a long time. For example:

Frozen plasticity theory | Frozen Evolution. Or, that’s not the way it is, Mr. Darwin. A Farewell to Selfish Gene.

This theory suggests a mechanism of the origin of adaptive traits in sexual organisms. The classical Darwinian mechanism of the origin of adaptive traits by natural selection can explain the evolution of such traits only under a very special situation, e.g., in a genetically homogeneous...

www.frozenevolution.com

Why you require that we must defeat (what that even means) the opinion (its not even a reasoning) of a religion teacher from some Iowa college is telling, too.

So, you offer yet another hypothesis as a band-aid to the TOE (aka HOE).

And, "Hey, we just saw that guy come out of a church ... he can't know anything!"

 

[o_mlly]

What known fact proves anything?

I, as a knowing, willing, and rational person, know that I exist. That's a fact, ma'am.

 

[BCP1928]

Cogito, ergo cogito sum

 

[o_mlly]

There may be a few non religious objections in the research base; do you have a link for the one that convinced you that evolution does not happen?

Mathematically, the probability that Darwin's hypothesis explained macroevolution is so improbable that it is effectively impossible.

Philosophically, Darwin's hypothesis violates First Principles, specifically the principle of Sufficient Reason. One species (definition?) cannot be the cause of another higher functioning species.

Empirically, new facts in molecular biology evidence many weaknesses in Darwin et al hypothesis.

 

[o_mlly]

They have changed massively over history. Some crocodilians had hooves, some stood upright, some were herbivores.

Did you honestly not know that?

No, and neither do you.

 

[o_mlly]

Assuming you clicked the link, what then ensued?

To access the link required I disconnect my adblocker.

Rather than link to an article, why don't you post what you think are its points that apply. If that's too much then post just the top three points.

 

[Astrid]

Cogito, ergo cogito sum

you think too many times

 

[Larniavc]

I, as a knowing, willing, and rational person, know that I exist. That's a fact, ma'am.

That’s a claim. Not a fact.

 

[BCP1928]

you think too many times

Some people say I don't think often enough.

 

[Larniavc]

Mathematically, the probability that Darwin's hypothesis explained macroevolution is so improbable that it is effectively impossible.

Please show your maths.

 

[Larniavc]

principle of Sufficient Reason

Please show how.

 

[Larniavc]

Empirically, new facts in molecular biology evidence many weaknesses in Darwin et al hypothesis.

Please show how.

 

[Larniavc]

No, and neither do you.

Really? What are your academic qualification?