Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It literally doesen'tPeople are silly if they think "secular law" has no religion in it.
What season?For everything there is a season…
Women's reproductive rightsWhich law might that be?
I mean, it’s sort of related, I guess? I don’t know? I’m just rambling now.Is News and Current events really the correct place for posts that are nothing but guesses about hypothetical situations?
For which thing?What season?
No need for you and yours to vote, then.In fact, voting for this election (or any election for that matter) doesn't have much meaning in it; God will choose the next ruler, not the people.
I love how it's being "characterized" as testimony and not "interviewed on Fox news".Here is the testimony of Grant Beth and Luke Polaske. They say Harris was looking right at them:
I chose that word on my own because it's used in the bible fairly frequently and because what happened is being challenged.I love how it's being "characterized" as testimony and not "interviewed on Fox news".
Oh baloney. Harris screwed up and it reflected badly on her.It's pretty clear how this is trying to be characterized and some parts of it are perverse.
Harris handled this planned attack with humor and grace.I chose that word on my own because it's used in the bible fairly frequently and because what happened is being challenged.
Oh baloney. Harris screwed up and it reflected badly on her.
Do you believe she may have mistaken what they said for something like, "Kamala for president!"?Prove to us she actually heard what they said.
She chose to be there.I love how it's being "characterized" as testimony and not "interviewed on Fox news".
It's pretty clear how this is trying to be characterized and some parts of it are perverse.
Now tell us all about the square circles and drunk sober people.People are silly if they think "secular law" has no religion in it. Of course, there is religious law in it. It may not be theistic religion, but it is religion. All the horrors of Communism, Nazism, Dictatorships, and such are based on secularism, a religion unto itself. Do we really need to rehearse the many evils that have been carried out in the name of secularism in the last 100 years alone? Numbers are hard to find, but conservative numbers relate up toward 1 billion babies that have been aborted since the 70s. Those were not religious abortions; they were legal secular abortions. There have been so many abortions in the US that the population replacement rate has dropped below 1.7. So many children are missing that we HAVE to allow millions of immigrants to flood into the country to replace the 1 in 7 Americans that have been aborted. There are not enough citizens to run the economy and pay the taxes to keep the doors open. In the last 100 years, over 200 million have died from secular wars waged by nations with the concept of "separation of church and state" in their constitution. Most of them have been innocent citizens. Today, and since the 1950s, the human race has been living under the threat of extinction because of secular countries and their nuclear weapons, Bio-weapons, and chemical weapons. All these things are based on secular, non-theistic religion. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. We can talk about purges, pogroms, and other atrocities committed by secular nations. How many Christians died in the massacres in China? How many are still dying? Many of these are claimed by nations as "democracies."
I would not toot your secular virtue too much. That is a lot of death on your head.
... and married bachelors. (Can't forget the classics.)Now tell us all about the square circles and drunk sober people.
It was her rally. No one disputes she chose to be at her own campaign event.She chose to be there.
I was referring to someone referencing her interview on Fox.It was her rally. No one disputes she chose to be at her own campaign event.
The hecklers also chose to be there. They chose to disrupt the proceedings. They knew ahead of their performance that they would be asked to leave - I’m sure they were counting on it for the success of the plan.
Who filmed it?
I'm guessing you've never been heckled.Do you believe she may have mistaken what they said for something like, "Kamala for president!"?
If she didn't understand what they said, it was dumb of her to tell them they belong somewhere else, unless it's like her to just say things without knowing what she's responding to.
Here is the testimony of Grant Beth and Luke Polaske. They say Harris was looking right at them:
What about what Grant Beth and Luke Polaske had to say about their experience with Harris?![]()
Harris says pro-life protesters are 'at the wrong rally' hours before Catholic charity dinner snub | Fox News Video
Vice President Kamala Harris told pro-life protesters they were at the 'wrong rally' as she campaigned in Wisconsin on Thursday and skipped the Al Smith Catholic charities dinner.www.foxnews.com
This is the video linked in the original post on this thread. The Fox interview spliced in a different vantage point that makes it look like she responded to something other than Lies, lies lies. Watch the unedited video to see the truth.