To serve his country, Donald Trump should leave the race

[Oompa Loompa]

Oh brother.

What's wrong?

 

[The Barbarian]

She is not "blathering" anything except her handler's approved talking points since she was crowned queen of the DNC.

Speaking of talking points...

The enthusiasm for her candidacy is surprisingly strong, but remember she's very smart and very capable. Trump is in a bit of a snit because she graduated cum laude and he... well, you know.

 

[The Barbarian]

Literally, she has not answered one single question from the press since Joe Biden dropped out.

Well, one comes up with the best one can, I suppose.

"Good college try, old chum."
H. Irving Hancock Dick Prescott's First Year at West Point

 

[Oompa Loompa]

Speaking of talking points...

The enthusiasm for her candidacy is surprisingly strong, but remember she's very smart and very capable. Trump is in a bit of a snit because she graduated cum laude and he... well, you know.

Okay.

 

[Oompa Loompa]

Well, one comes up with the best one can, I suppose.

"Good college try, old chum."
H. Irving Hancock Dick Prescott's First Year at West Point

What is this?

 

[Larniavc]

Then you condemn the thief n the cross to Eternal Death?

Who cares about some thief? This is about Mr Trump.

 

[Larniavc]

The obvious changes in his life style, just like me!

Which obvious change?

 

[th1bill]

Good question. Jesus said it. I believe He was right.

That is a normal Left Elietest Answer that avoids answering to the issue. Maybe you could express your thoughts like real people?

 

[eclipsenow]

We can only hope it works. We actually need him elected the alternative is a disaster.

Ah, Project 2025 is the disaster. Disbanding the department of education? Really? And don't give me the "he's distanced himself from it" when there is video of him praising the Heritage Foundation and promising to follow their work.

 

[eclipsenow]

And what evidence would be sufficient for an official salvation inspector?

Usually the one making the argument has to submit the evidence.
Usually when someone has as chequered a past and present as Donald Trump - the evidence had better be pretty spectacular!
Usually people across the world are a bit more sceptical of politicians 'finding faith' when it's for a certain voter base. (See Christianity Today link above.)
Why is that voter base so unusual in that they fall for this stuff, every time?
In the Australian Anglican church - ministers are not allowed to really recommend which party to vote for. Making the gospel attractive to as broad a range of people is the priority. In America is seems the gospel of the Republican Party gets a better hearing than the gospel of Jesus Christ!

“I watched twenty years ago as people suggested that those waving away a president’s sexual behavior as irrelevant to his public office were the result of liberal forms of Baptist theology, and then lived long enough to watch the same people suggest that those who did not wave away such behavior from another president might not be “real Christians.” People can change their minds, of course. I certainly have done so on many things. But—as with the prophecy charts a generation ago—there is no talk of minds changing, just certainties in one direction and then certainties in the opposite direction, with the only difference being the tribal affiliations of the leaders under discussion.” Losing Our Religion - Russell Moore​

 

[Postvieww]

The enthusiasm for her candidacy is surprisingly strong, but remember she's very smart and very capable.

Yes yes very very smart and very very capable! Give me a break do you really believe what you wrote?

This enthusiasm you speak of is a contrived result of the gaslighting of the America public.The papers on her wall do not show intelligence, that is a false premise.

 

[Postvieww]

Ah, Project 2025 is the disaster. Disbanding the department of education? Really?

Yes really! Disband the department or replace the entire woke staff. Education in this country is on life support. This transgender wokeness has no place in our schools. Schools need to get back to the basics of education and stay out of the liberal brainwashing of our children
.
Do you care to delve further into project 2025 with specifics and not rhetoric? I have a Project 2025 PDF on my computer and I am sure you can find one. Refer to any specifics and make your case. I have heard enough of the generalizations with liberal talking points.

 

[Tropical Wilds]

What's wrong?

Nothing, just get exhausted of the reality rewrites and the get out of jail free cards.

 

[The Barbarian]

The enthusiasm for her candidacy is surprisingly strong, but remember she's very smart and very capable.

Yes yes very very smart and very very capable! Give me a break do you really believe what you wrote?

After high school, Harris attended Howard University, the prestigious historically Black college in Washington, D.C. She majored in political science and economics, and joined the Alpha Kappa Alpha sorority.

She got her law degree at the University of California Law School at San Francisco.

Became a prosecutor in San Francisco.

During her first three years as district attorney, San Francisco’s conviction rate jumped from 52 to 67 percent.

Seems to be obvious to anyone with any sense at all.

This enthusiasm you speak of is a contrived result of the gaslighting of the America public.

Do you really believe what you wrote? C'mon. Not only has she produced a lot of enthusiasm among democrats, she's also produced a lot of dismay and denial on the part of republicans. And gaslighting won't do you any good. Trump needs to make some adjustments in his campaign quickly.

The papers on her wall do not show intelligence, that is a false premise.

Performance counts. She wasn't just a brilliant student. She was a very good prosecutor, as her numbers show.

 

[Postvieww]

The enthusiasm for her candidacy is surprisingly strong, but remember she's very smart and very capable.

After high school, Harris attended Howard University, the prestigious historically Black college in Washington, D.C. She majored in political science and economics, and joined the Alpha Kappa Alpha sorority.

She got her law degree at the University of California Law School at San Francisco.

Became a prosecutor in San Francisco.

During her first three years as district attorney, San Francisco’s conviction rate jumped from 52 to 67 percent.

Seems to be obvious to anyone with any sense at all.


Do you really believe what you wrote? C'mon. Not only has she produced a lot of enthusiasm among democrats, she's also produced a lot of dismay and denial on the part of republicans. And gaslighting won't do you any good. Trump needs to make some adjustments in his campaign quickly.


Performance counts. She wasn't just a brilliant student. She was a very good prosecutor, as her numbers show.

I noticed you ignored her ramblings on inflation. My 7 year old grandson could talk as eloquently as Kamala did explaining inflation. No solutions offered just rambling word salads . Your analysis of Kamala’s intelligence is woefully unconvincing.

 

[The Barbarian]

I noticed you ignored her ramblings on inflation. My 7 year old grandson could talk as eloquently as Kamala did explaining inflation. No solutions offered just rambling word salads .

Seems like she got it right. Yes, she stated it pretty much in a way that a 7-YO could understand it. That's a sign of intelligence, you know. I think it was Feynman who wrote that if you couldn't explain something to an elementary school student, you didn't really understand it.

Anyway, given her academic and professional achievements, your objection seems like a rather weak excuse, doesn't it?

 

[Postvieww]

Seems like she got it right. Yes, she stated it pretty much in a way that a 7-YO could understand it. That's a sign of intelligence, you know. I think it was Feynman who wrote that if you couldn't explain something to an elementary school student, you didn't really understand it.

According to your theory she is the smartest politician in Washington. No one else speaks that way. Let's get real you are just desperately trying to defend the indefensible with rhetoric not substance.

Anyway, given her academic and professional achievements, your objection seems like a rather weak excuse, doesn't it?

No, she will be seen for what she is, just an empty suit. Just give it time , maybe a real serious press conference or debate then we can have this conversation again.

 

[The Barbarian]

According to your theory she is the smartest politician in Washington.

Well, she's not the only politician who can talk plainly. Katie Porter used to be really good at explaining things simply. George W. Bush often managed to do that. He's smarter than he sometimes appears to be.

No one else speaks that way.

Not many politicians speak plainly, it's true. One in particular.

Let's get real you are just desperately trying to defend the indefensible with rhetoric not substance.

For most Americans, substance is what it's about. Harris, having been a prosecutor, probably is less inclined to the kind of stuff that you like. But cogency has some benefits. Anyway, given her academic and professional achievements, your objection seems like a rather weak excuse, doesn't it?

No, she will be seen for what she is, just an empty suit.

Not according to her numbers as prosecutor. Let's try to stay real here.

maybe a real serious press conference or debate

Apparently, Trump bailed out on a debate unless she agrees to do it on his terms, in his venue.

Donald Trump says he is pulling out of a scheduled September debate with Vice President Kamala Harris on ABC and wants them to face off on Fox News

MSN

Which is probably a wise decision, given Trump's cognitive issues. His handlers were wise to pull the plug on an open debate.

 

[Postvieww]

Apparently, Trump bailed out on a debate unless she agrees to do it on his terms, in his venue.

More liberal propaganda!

The facts are Trump had agreed to debate Biden with certain terms NOT KAMALA. She needs to renegotiate the debate for her own terms.
Trump debated and scorched Biden in his venue. Cannot Kamala handle the real questions she might get at Fox?

 

[Postvieww]

Which is probably a wise decision, given Trump's cognitive issues. His handlers were wise to pull the plug on an open debate.

I thought we were going to get serious?????? More liberal propaganda.