- Apr 5, 2007
- 144,404
- 27,057
- 57
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Married
Kamala explaining the cloud. I’m glad she has a grasp on this technology. We need this kind of leadership.
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Donald Trump had to get his briefings on one page in picture format because he couldn't pay attention more then that. I wouldn't be mocking anyone's intelligence or competence were I you.It is at times very difficult for us people at the lower end of the IQ spectrum to comprehend the absolute brilliance of people like Kamala Harris.
Highly intelligent people have always been seen as being slightly odd or out there by the rest of us , and that is simply because we do not understand their intellectual prowess.
I have learnt so much recently about yellow buses and much thanks to Kamala , however I am having difficulty with her passage of time statement , not her fault of course it's mine , my IQ is just not up to her level.
I think she would make a terrific leader , all the low IQ leaders of other nations will be in absolute awe of her and also be very fearful knowing that she has the nuclear codes.....
.
You guys really don’t like the videos that expose Kamala. In November, an NBC poll had her at the worst VP in history. Now she’s just so awesome.A video which gives no context or provides no original video to watch, provided by a Christian Forum's staff member.
Worse yet, taking said manipulated video to conclude a lack of leadership based on an apparent out of context video.
Not classy at all.
This thread isn’t about Trump. If you want to start one with that evidence, then feel free.Donald Trump had to get his briefings on one page in picture format because he couldn't pay attention more then that. I wouldn't be mocking anyone's intelligence or competence were I you.
Agreed. There is no argument that a manipulated and out of context video about Kamala Harris was posted without considering the original source to bolster the comment of leadership. And so it goes....But if you really want to rebut this, find the original.
Again, if you think this is anything other than her looking foolish, you can easily rebut it by finding the original. For months before the debate the left kept telling us that the videos of Biden looking lost and incompetent were being manipulated and used out of context. Well, we found out that it wasn’t true. I mean, we knew it, but the debate just confirmed what everyone knew. But hey, may you are right this time. If so, I’ll take down the thread.Agreed. There is no argument that a manipulated and out of context video about Kamala Harris was posted without considering the original source to bolster the comment of leadership. And so it goes....
Well we all know about all those manipulated videos that falsely portrayed the last candidate as loopy, when in reality he was sharp as a tack.Agreed. There is no argument that a manipulated and out of context video about Kamala Harris was posted without considering the original source to bolster the comment of leadership. And so it goes....
But if you really want to rebut this, find the original.
Like I said, find it and if the context changes what she said, I’ll take this thread down.Really?
What do you have to fear by sharing the original in context?
Like I said, find it and if the context changes what she said, I’ll take this thread down.
I didn’t make a claim. I posted a video....so if I were to follow your example (as a "Site Advisor")), I can make any claim here without a verifiable reference. Is that correct?
Again, if you think this is anything other than her looking foolish, you can easily rebut it by finding the original.
Thanks for spending two minutes to try to make her look good.What would be preferable is for you and other staff members to lead by example and do that legwork before posting, instead of adding to the pile of low quality content already permeating the board.
It’s clear from the video that it’s possible that the additional context would make this clip seem perfectly reasonable. That was my first thought when seeing it last night, and why I immediately went looking for the original.
Granted, I couldn’t find it in the couple minutes I invested in it - but then, I didn’t start a thread about it, either.
Not quite, a comment was also posted saying that her leadership should be questioned based on a manipulated video without context.I didn’t make a claim. I posted a video.
I didn’t make a claim. I posted a video.
It wasn’t about making her look good. It was about learning what happened.Thanks for spending two minutes to try to make her look good.