False Narrative about Kamala unravels

[BobRyan]

Tulsi not only exposed Kamala's record in 2016

But she just exposed additional info for the current race

==================

And apparently Democratic party politicians facing a contested election - are less than over-the-top in support for Harris.

From Politico -- https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/22/swing-seat-democrats-kamala-harris-endorsements-00170231

"Most of the Democratic challengers running for competitive seats across the country had glaring omissions in their statements Sunday about President Joe Biden bowing out of the race. They didn’t mention Vice President Kamala Harris.

"It was an eyebrow-raising contrast to the dozens of House and Senate Democratic incumbents who immediately came out in support of Harris as their party’s nominee. And it was even more noticeable in the blue states of New York and California, which hold a slew of districts where voters chose Biden in 2020 but have supported GOP candidates down the ballot since.

... Harris is a relative unknown. Few campaigns have polling data indicating her standing in key states and districts.
“It’s likely her,” said one Democratic operative working on multiple competitive House races, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. “But what’s the harm in trying to hold out hoping someone better happens?”

(Not exactly the equivalent of the blow-out event of the Republican Convention of 2024)

============ efforts to document the democratic attempt to re-write Harris' record

==================
In this next vid - we see
BLM question the transition to Kamala for the 2024 election
We see CBS question Kamala on being the most extreme left of all democratic Senators
We see Axios try to delete its reporting about Kamala being assigned Border Czar role in 2021

revising history for Kamala?

More about revising history for Kamala -

Why the Kamala Harris of Four Years Ago Could Haunt Her in 2024

She ran to the left as progressive ideas dominated the last competitive Democratic primary. Now, in a tough general election, Republicans are digging up her old stances.

www.nytimes.com

That article is titled " Why the Kamala Harris of Four Years Ago Could Haunt Her in 2024"

 

[BobRyan]

But there is a signature move by Harris - that can never be debunked. It is solid gold.

see 1:24 min:sec into the video

But Harris seems to be willing to give Trump a little bit of help in certain states.

 

[Maria Billingsley]

Tulsi not only exposed Kamala's record in 2016

But she just exposed additional info for the current race

Some fact checking .

Were attacks on Kamala Harris’ record on target?

Sen. Kamala Harris’ record as a prosecutor in California came under sharp criticism at last night’s Democratic president

www.politifact.com

 

[durangodawood]

Tucker and a Harris impersonator?

Grow up, America.

 

[Vambram]

Tucker and a Harris impersonator?

Grow up, America.

That Tucker Carlson segment with the Harris impersonator was laugh out loud funny to me.

 

[durangodawood]

That Tucker Carlson segment with the Harris impersonator was laugh out loud funny to me.

I wont contest that it works for you. I had just thought the thread was supposed to be about something real. My mistake.

 

[probinson]

Tucker and a Harris impersonator?

Grow up, America.

Odd response. Parodying presidents and other politicians is something that America has done for generations. Heck, SNL has a whole special dedicated to presidential impersonations. My personal favorite was the Bush h v Gore debate. "Strategery". Comedy gold.

So do you disapprove of all political comedy, or just that which involves Harris?

 

[durangodawood]

Odd response. Parodying presidents and other politicians is something that America has done for generations. Heck, SNL has a whole special dedicated to presidential impersonations. My personal favorite was the Bush h v Gore debate. "Strategery". Comedy gold.

So do you disapprove of all political comedy, or just that which involves Harris?

See post #6

 

[DaisyDay]

Some fact checking .

Were attacks on Kamala Harris’ record on target?

Sen. Kamala Harris’ record as a prosecutor in California came under sharp criticism at last night’s Democratic president

www.politifact.com

Fact checking? Like accuracy matters more than fun insults ?

 

[chevyontheriver]

It's so cute when people just believe what Politifact sez without fact checking them. Not that all fact checkers are wrong, but I've learned over the years that sometimes the fact checkers themself are the problem. And when you actually read the "fact check", you find it is picking nits, when, in reality, the point made by Gabbard is real and the point is made.

Dishonest Fact-Checkers

Summary: Both of the nation’s most prominent fact-checking organizations—FactCheck.org and PolitiFact—tilt to the political left, which makes them representative of the majority of journalists who also lean to port. Both of these groups go far beyond what they say they…

capitalresearch.org

You've got Democratic facts and you've got Republican facts and you've got factual facts. A Venn diagram (Kamala's favorite thing I hear) shows little overlap of any of those three sorts of facts.

 

[BPPLEE]

One of the talking heads was saying yesterday that we should expect a "honeymoon" period with Kamala and the MSM before things get real. And this video is a hint at what we will be seeing once the honeymoon is over.

For MSM the honeymoon will never end.

 

[probinson]

Fact checking? Like accuracy matters more than fun insults ?

It always amuses me what self-appointed "fact checkers" think is worthy of "fact checking".

This article in particular is interesting. It's not a "fact-check" at all. It's a rebuttal, with dubious claims of "missing context" without really clarifying what that "context" is.

 

[probinson]

You've got Democratic facts and you've got Republican facts and you've got factual facts. A Venn diagram (Kamala's favorite thing I hear) shows little overlap of any of those three sorts of facts.

Boy, ain't that the truth! I suspect that you couldn't make a Venn diagram at all with those three different types of "facts". Just three completely separate non-intersecting circles.

 

[essentialsaltes]

I wont contest that it works for you. I had just thought the thread was supposed to be about something real. My mistake.

Entertainment is just as valid as news for forming opinions about the state of the nation!

 

[BPPLEE]

Entertainment is just as valid as news for forming opinions about the state of the nation!

Remember what it did to Anita Bryant?

 

[wing2000]

But she just exposed additional info for the current race

Such as?

 

[Pommer]

This one is awesome!

Focus Group SAVAGES Kamala on MSNBC! ‘She’s An Idiot!’

Try Liver Health Formula by going to https://GetLiverHelp.com/Turley and claim your FREE Blood Sugar Formula gift. That’s https://GetLiverHelp.com/Turley *The content presented by sponsors may contain

rumble.com

Great, an idiot v. a [expletive deleted] moron, good times!

 

[DaisyDay]

It always amuses me what self-appointed "fact checkers" think is worthy of "fact checking".

This article in particular is interesting. It's not a "fact-check" at all. It's a rebuttal, with dubious claims of "missing context" without really clarifying what that "context" is.

It is equally interesting what people find worth defending. Sexual assault? Oh well. Bragging about sexual assault? Meh, locker talk. Multiple felony and fraud convictions? Well, who doesn't have a few. Cheats at golf? Fine, lols. Constant, self-aggrandizing lies? That's our Donald! Inciting insurrection? It didn't work, so what. Flagrantly violation the emoluments clause to receive millions from foreign states? Immunity!

 

[DaisyDay]

This one is awesome!

Focus Group SAVAGES Kamala on MSNBC! ‘She’s An Idiot!’

Try Liver Health Formula by going to https://GetLiverHelp.com/Turley and claim your FREE Blood Sugar Formula gift. That’s https://GetLiverHelp.com/Turley *The content presented by sponsors may contain

rumble.com

Try Liver Health Formula by going to Liver Health Formula and claim your FREE Blood Sugar Formula gift. That’s Liver Health Formula

Get Liver Help? Click on the link and pay Turley. These scams are pretty blatant.

 

[probinson]

It is equally interesting what people find worth defending. Sexual assault? Oh well. Bragging about sexual assault? Meh, locker talk. Multiple felony and fraud convictions? Well, who doesn't have a few. Cheats at golf? Fine, lols. Constant, self-aggrandizing lies? That's our Donald! Inciting insurrection? It didn't work, so what. Flagrantly violation the emoluments clause to receive millions from foreign states? Immunity!

Who is defending ANY of that in this thread?

I was talking about self-appointed "fact-checkers". I find it amusing that Politifact found it necessary to "fact check" that video. Gotta attempt to downplay it somehow, I suppose. I mean, most people (like yourself, apparently) don't even really care that the "fact-check" isn't a "fact-check" at all. They're just happy that some random, self-appointed fact-checker bothered to write something so they'd have a link to "refute" the video.