Whyayeman
Well-Known Member
- Dec 8, 2018
- 4,626
- 3,133
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
I agree with all of this - up to the point of whose business it is. Nearly all circumcision in performed on extremely young babies. There is a school of thought, which emerged out of the modern revulsion about female genital mutilation, that circumcision is mutilation too. Just saying.My only real point here is that I don't think saying The Catholic Church is the reason for modern circumcision in the West is a valid argument. Especially given that, generally, Catholicism has historically frowned on circumcision because of historic theological and religious issues that go back to the earliest years of Christianity, when there were still ongoing debates among Christians over whether Christians are obligated to observe Jewish laws or not; with circumcision being one of the big ones.
And my own (granted, meager) reading on the history of the topic tends to suggest that modern medical circumcision (as opposed to religious circumcision) is 1) mostly American and 2) a result of early 20th century medical views.
To focus on the topic on the whole: It's not my business what people do with their bodies, whether it is cosmetic surgery or something else. The only caveat would involve the subject of self-harm; if a person is engaging in self-harm then we should focus on helping them find healing for the emotional traumas and injuries they have experienced. Whatever personal opinion I, or anyone else, has over something like tattoos, piercings, cosmetic surgery, or the like is completely meaningless--because it's not my business.
-CryptoLutheran
Upvote
0