- Jun 25, 2018
- 11,794
- 11,206
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Female
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Constitution
I’m going to work as long as I am able
Everyone does that.
People who worked their life in office type jobs, lawyers and such, can often work into their 80's and enjoy doing such before retiring.
But I am against raising or doing away with the social security retirement age because doing so disproportionately affects the working class, who's bodies are still breaking down by 60 in many cases.
My husband was born in '61 so he's not very old but he actually needed to be able to get on social security earlier than he was able to qualify according to age because he's got arthritis so bad now.
Disability is a very lengthy, lengthy process that's quite difficult for most people to get on. It takes something major to occur for disability to be easy to get. So while getting on disability is an option for some who need it, it's not exactly practical for getting through a year or two until you qualify for social security if your body just can't physically do the work anymore.
Every time you raise the age I think you have to consider how many former military men, how many construction workers, how many mechanics and welders and electrical journeyman are able to physically work to a certain age.
I actually did think a lot of Paul Ryan's (wasn't it Paul Ryan's plan?) plan to phase out social security the way we are doing it and phasing in savings plans for kids that they could begin when they start working...
We do need to revamp social security the way we are doing it. But we can start something new and phase out the old at the same time so that no one is adversely affected.
I never understood why more people weren't behind that. I really liked it even though he was establishment. A good idea is a good idea.
Last edited:
Upvote
0