Is humanity an evolution of data cloning ?

[fredis]

A “Human being” is a biological designation for those of the species Homo sapiens.

In realism and scientific terms , a human being is a neurological reference frame that is a secondary existence within a primary sentient host , constructed of wave-function (light) .

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I have already provided the evidence in our conversation , words .

If your N.R.F did not contain in memory , cloned data , you couldn't have this conversation .

If your native language was different , you'd still have neuro-constants but the evolution of the N.R.F would have variation , example cat=katze

Again, that is still not evidence that human thoughs are cloned data. You are just saying it's evidence, but you're not showing that it's evidence.

 

[fredis]

Again, that is still not evidence that human thoughs are cloned data. You are just saying it's evidence, but you're not showing that it's evidence.

Your argument is the semantics of evidence . I insist I have provided evidence already . If you haven't noticed we spell the same . That is evidence .

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Your argument is the semantics of evidence . I insist I have provided evidence already . If you haven't noticed we spell the same . That is evidence .

We spell the same because we're both using English. You're from Cheshire, I'm from Wales, we were both taught how to write using Modern English. That is not evidence at all for anything you have said.

 

[fredis]

We spell the same because we're both using English. You're from Cheshire, I'm from Wales, we were both taught how to write using Modern English. That is not evidence at all for anything you have said.

Yes it is evidence because if our neurological reference frames didn't have the same cloned data (English words) , we'd be unable to have a conversation .

Hello by the way , some lovely places in Wales .

Think about it , when you was born , inside your mind were no words . Your N.R.F then evolved as it gained more information from education .

If you was born in Germany for example , you'd have the word constant Katze in your mind instead of cat .

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Yes it is evidence because if our neurological reference frames didn't have the same cloned data (English words) , we'd be unable to have a conversation .

Hello by the way , some lovely places in Wales .

Think about it , when you was born , inside your mind were no words . Your N.R.F then evolved as it gained more information from education .

If you was born in Germany for example , you'd have the word constant Katze in your mind instead of cat .

Even though I very much disagree with your ideas, what does any of it have to do with the argument between the schools of thought of life evolving through natural selection vs life coming about through the creation by God?

 

[fredis]

Even though I very much disagree with your ideas, what does any of it have to do with the argument between the schools of thought of life evolving through natural selection vs life coming about through the creation by God?

Ok , try to stay calm after my answer because it is a bit of a neurological shock .


God didn't create human beings , human beings created themselves .

The sentient beings that human beings occupy were created by God . The first sentient beings ''hand made'' by God by the process of cell placement .


Darwin's and sciences theory of evolution , falsifiable .

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Ok , try to stay calm after my answer because it is a bit of a neurological shock .


God didn't create human beings , human beings created themselves .

The sentient beings that human beings occupy were created by God . The first sentient beings ''hand made'' by God by the process of cell placement .


Darwin's and sciences theory of evolution , falsifiable .

You wouldn't happen to be a fan of the writings of L.Ron Hubbard, by any chance?

 

[fredis]

You wouldn't happen to be a fan of the writings of L.Ron Hubbard, by any chance?

I've not really read many books , so no I have not heard of that writer .

It has took me over a decade evolving my N.R.F with education to be able prove a Gods existence and scientifically understand the entire Universe .


Yes you heard that right , I can prove God by falsifying science and using science .

I have studied some religion , some biology , some chemistry , neuro-science and physics to be able create a theory that will create world peace , but getting the world leaders to listen and accept is another story .

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I've not really read many books , so no I have not heard of that writer .

It has took me over a decade evolving my N.R.F with education to be able prove a Gods existence and scientifically understand the entire Universe .


Yes you heard that right , I can prove God by falsifying science and using science .

I have studied some religion , some biology , some chemistry , neuro-science and physics to be able create a theory that will create world peace , but getting the world leaders to listen and accept is another story .

 

[fredis]

Yes I know it sounds far fetched but I am very serious about the absolute truths .

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Yes I know it sounds far fetched but I am very serious about the absolute truths .

It sounds very far fetched. Too far fetched to believed.

Enough that I am no longer wanting to take part in this thread. Good bye.

 

[fredis]

It sounds very far fetched. Too far fetched to believed.

Enough that I am no longer wanting to take part in this thread. Good bye.

Good bye and thankyou for the discussion , I understand it sounds far fetched but it really isn't once you understand it all .

A man takes his pet dog to the vet and the vet in joke says to the dog , ''what's up with you then?''

To the vets amazement the dog replied , ''' I am hearing voices in my head ''


The vet replied , '' That is because you are becoming human''


Good bye

 

[chevyontheriver]

Thermal energy is light and brain waves are also light .

The theory is provable without testing .

Scientific theories are provable WITH testing.

Light is generally from 380 nm up to 750 nm. Higher or lower are other forms of electromagnetic radiation.

 

[chevyontheriver]

And yet, you have people such as I disagreeing with you.

Me too.

 

[chevyontheriver]

Would you like me to switch to scientist ''mode'' but then it might be even more difficult to understand ?

Or easier probably.

 

[fredis]

Scientific theories are provable WITH testing.

Light is generally from 380 nm up to 750 nm. Higher or lower are other forms of electromagnetic radiation.

Yes visible light is between 380m-700nm also referred to has the visible spectrum .

Yes there is wave-lengths of light that are not visible but detectable .

Logical proofs provided with axiom evidence doesn't require testing .

 

[fredis]

Or easier probably.

Neurological reference frame , do you understand this terminology ?

 

[Bradskii]

...but when I eventually prove our souls is the data....

Ahh. That's where this was going. The place where memories are stored. The hippocampus and the neocortex.

 

[chevyontheriver]

Yes visible light is between 380m-700nm also referred to has the visible spectrum .

Maybe we agree on that.

Yes there is wave-lengths of light that are not visible but detectable .

IF you are referring to near UV or near IR maybe I can agree with you. IF you are talking about the whole rest of the spectrum of EM radiation then no. It's EM radiation, of which light is only a small band of frequencies.

Logical proofs provided with axiom evidence doesn't require testing .

Your theory would need testing to see the 'light'. It is NOT axiomatic. If there is no observable 'light' then your theory crashes and burns.