• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Israel-Hamas Thread II

Nithavela

you're in charge you can do it just get louis
Apr 14, 2007
30,576
22,241
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟586,925.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
For example, Trump told the Taliban leader that if they tried seizing land or killed one American that his village would be destroyed and they would be hit with a force like no other country had ever been hit with before. If Iranian backed forces shoot rockets and injure American soldiers, you have to have a great response. That, unfortunately, means killing some enemy soldiers. Joe ordered some warehouses be destroyed, thus more and more terrorist attacks.
Ah, of course. The deal trump brokered with the Taliban to only attack afghan targets and be left alone in return. I remember that. One of the key parts of the taliban conquering Afghanistan.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
12,175
5,772
Minnesota
✟325,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Ah, of course. The deal trump brokered with the Taliban to only attack afghan targets and be left alone in return. I remember that. One of the key parts of the taliban conquering Afghanistan.
They were not to seize any land controlled by the Afghan government, and they did not after Trump's warning until Joe became president. Then they seized land, when Joe did not respond and concealed that fact from the American public the Taliban, predictably, seized more.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Acts of terrorism increased because the region was destabilized and became a breeding ground for terrorist recruitment. The war against terrorists ended up creating more terrorists. After a twenty-year US occupation of Afghanistan, the Taliban has been growing in numbers and strength in recent years and has been responsible for a surge in terrorism in Pakistan. Prior to the US invasion of Iraq, there was no ISIS. But after the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and the collapse of the Iraqi government, ISIS and several other new terror groups emerged. Unfortunately, the end result of Israel's war against Hamas will be no different.

The US invaded Afghanistan to destroy Al-Qaeda. The Taliban refused to hand over Osama bin Laden, so they also became a target.

Afghanistan, a known training ground and safe haven for the terrorist group [al-Qaeda] led by Osama bin Laden, became the initial focus of military efforts to strike back. That distant, land-locked, mountainous country presented great challenges to planners and operators. The U.S. Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Navy overcame those obstacles to project power halfway across the globe and conduct an offensive, in concert with Afghan allies, which drove al-Qaeda into retreat and quickly toppled the Taliban regime that supported the terrorists.

War with al-Qaeda meant war with its host the Taliban who had gained control of most of Afghanistan in the 1990s. In October 2001, U.S. military forces began a campaign against both groups. With the help of various anti-Taliban militias, American troops fought to remove the Taliban from power, destroy al-Qaeda, find bin Laden, and preclude terrorists from using Afghanistan as a refuge. Afghanistan, therefore, would be the first conflict in the decades-long Global War on Terrorism.

From Afghanistan, bin Laden and his al-Qaeda network planned and set in motion the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks on New York City and the Pentagon. He wanted to draw the United States into a protracted and unwinnable war in Afghanistan, much as the Soviets had been... the Taliban likely did not know of these plans.

Within hours after the World Trade Center’s twin towers fell in New York City, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) reported that al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden had planned and orchestrated the attacks from their sanctuary in Afghanistan. Bush and his cabinet then learned that the Taliban was hosting and protecting bin Laden. Going to war with al-Qaeda would require fighting the Taliban.



Hamas used the same strategy as Bin Laden. They knew going into the terror attack on October 7th that Israel would respond with overwhelming force in Gaza and get caught up in a long, unwinnable war. It was a trap, and Israel fell right into it.


I didn't say the war in Iraq was against al Qaeda, I said the US did the same in Iraq; bombed, invaded, and occupied the country.


From northwest Africa to southeast Asia, al-Qa`ida has maintained a global movement of some two dozen local networks. Among the movement’s estimated 20,000 or so men-at-arms are some 3,500-5,000 hardcore loyalists in Syria belonging to al-Qa`ida’s main stalking horse in that country, Hurras al-Din. Longstanding al-Qa`ida loyalists like al-Shabaab in Somalia and al-Qa`ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) in Yemen each command approximately 7,000 men, with several hundred associated with al-Qa`ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). There are estimated to be at least 400-600 al-Qa`ida fighters in Afghanistan.

Evidence that al-Qa`ida and its franchises have not abandoned prospects of reinvigorating their campaign of international terrorism with some new, dramatic, and spectacular attack may be deduced from the reports that twice this past year, al-Shabaab operatives have been arrested while taking flying lessons: one in 2019 in the Philippines and the other earlier this year in an undisclosed African country. The former had researched skyscrapers in the United States and aviation security as well as taking flying lessons in a plot that is believed to have commenced in 2016.

The December 2019 shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola in Florida was not only the first deadly terrorist attack on U.S. soil coordinated by a foreign terrorist organization since 9/11, it was perpetrated by an individual embedded within the Saudi Air Force, with whom AQAP had been in contact while he was on U.S. territory, up to and including the night before the attack.

Al-Qa`ida and its affiliates have not laid down their arms, nor do they have any intent to spare the United States in their ongoing jihad. Accordingly, they likely see themselves poised to benefit from any diminishment or indeed the complete withdrawal of U.S. military forces from Afghanistan, Africa, and elsewhere.



Al Qaeda is currently expanding its global presence, the Islamic State continues to be the deadliest terror group in the world, and the Taliban is probably stronger today than it was prior to the U.S. invasion in 2001. Military action clearly isn't a viable solution when it comes to eliminating terrorist groups.

I don't want to he that guy....but the proliferation of modern terrorist organizations is the result of the abandonment of total war post WW2.

Every terrorist organization would be dissolved overnight if we no longer distinguished between state and non-state actors.
 
Upvote 0

Nithavela

you're in charge you can do it just get louis
Apr 14, 2007
30,576
22,241
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟586,925.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
They were not to seize any land controlled by the Afghan government, and they did not after Trump's warning until Joe became president. Then they seized land, when Joe did not respond and concealed that fact from the American public the Taliban, predictably, seized more.
Any examples of the Trump administration using actual force against terrorist organisations? So far you have only talked about a very specific threat that wasn't carried out.
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
12,175
5,772
Minnesota
✟325,613.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Any examples of the Trump administration using actual force against terrorist organisations? So far you have only talked about a very specific threat that wasn't carried out.
They did seize land under the Biden regime.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Ah, of course. The deal trump brokered with the Taliban to only attack afghan targets and be left alone in return. I remember that. One of the key parts of the taliban conquering Afghanistan.

Putting Afghanistan on Trump is a sad sad joke.

It was a bad idea by the end of the Bush administration....and it was a bad idea under Obama.

Trump pulled the plug on it and that's a good thing. It's not his fault Joe licked the light socket.
 
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Any examples of the Trump administration using actual force against terrorist organisations? So far you have only talked about a very specific threat that wasn't carried out.


How about that example?

Soleimani was amongst the most popular personalities in Iran, viewed by many as a "selfless hero fighting Iran's enemies",[24][25][26] by others as a "murderer".[27][28][29] Soleimani was personally sanctioned by the United Nations and the European Union,[30][31][32] and was designated as a terrorist by the United States in 2005.


He killed arguably the most important and powerful terrorist in the middle east.
 
Upvote 0

JosephZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2017
4,538
4,451
Davao City
Visit site
✟305,425.00
Country
Philippines
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I don't want to he that guy....but the proliferation of modern terrorist organizations is the result of the abandonment of total war post WW2.
Islamic terrorism, like what we have seen over the past two decades, is a recent phenomenon. Prior to 2010, less than 10% of all terrorism globally was Islamic-related. The large increase in terrorism we saw in the 2010s had nothing to do with the abandonment of a total war policy; it was the direct result of western intervention in the Middle East, South Asia, and North Africa, as the charts below clearly show.


foreign intervention and conflict2.jpg


Terrorism by region:

terrorism by year.jpg
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Vanellus
Upvote 0

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
39,990
12,573
✟487,130.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Islamic terrorism, like what we have seen over the past two decades, is a recent phenomenon.





I'll be honest, I don't know if I'd specifically call the Taliban a terrorist organization. You really sort of need to be a non-state actor (or unofficial state actor) fighting against the domestic government or a foreign power. The Taliban is kind of what just happens in a power vaccuum.


Prior to 2010, less than 10% of all terrorism globally was Islamic-related.

You'll notice I said "modern terrorist organizations" instead of "Islamic terrorism".

Perhaps checking next time by throwing a question my way would help.


The large increase in terrorism we saw in the 2010s had nothing to do with the abandonment of a total war policy; it was the direct result of western intervention in the Middle East, South Asia, and North Africa, as the charts below clearly show.

It's odd to me when self-flaggelating Europeans attribute everything bad that happens in the world to themselves.

It's fascinating to see people so vastly overestimate the importance of their ancestors actions while simultaneously infantilizing literally everyone else. It's both condescending and factually incorrect.

To be fair, I'm willing to consider any arguments that you want to make against any western intervention into the middle east after the fall of the Ottoman Empire. It's an undeniable fact that a multitude of European nations, post WW1, recognized that the Ottoman Empire was officially done....as was the relative stability they created for a vast amount of various geographically diverse region of Arab Muslims. You can certainly claim that this was all pretext for future exploitation of resources like oil which had become so important to the world economy and western nations in general.

I am going to ask what sort of result do you think would happen had no intervention happened at all though. Do you imagine all these regions, with their longstanding and complex rivalries against each other wouldn't have resulted in some 100-200 years of inter-factional warfare? If so....why?

For example....do you think the PKK is the result of too much Western support to the Kurds, not enough support of the Kurds, etc?


I have no idea where you're pulling these graphs from and I'm just going to point out they seem pretty garbage given the fact that the very definition of a terrorist group has likewise shifted wildly over time and it seems rather clear the internet and it's advent throughout the middle east has had a bigger impact on Islamic terrorism (specifically) than any "western intervention".

I'll give you credit for at least biting the apple I offered. I'm not sure if you grasp the thesis I'm proposing though.
 
Upvote 0

Chesterton

Whats So Funny bout Peace Love and Understanding
Site Supporter
May 24, 2008
26,237
21,445
Flatland
✟1,082,634.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Al Qaeda is currently expanding its global presence, the Islamic State continues to be the deadliest terror group in the world, and the Taliban is probably stronger today than it was prior to the U.S. invasion in 2001. Military action clearly isn't a viable solution when it comes to eliminating terrorist groups.
Military action is a viable solution. I recall where you previously posted a chart showing where ISIS is still active. Every expert I've heard will disagree. Al Qaeda and ISIS are dead. The simple way to know this is that they're not in the news. The reason they're called "terrorists" is because they want to instill terror, and that can't be done unless news of an atrocity spreads. If a suicide bomber walks into an Indonesian discotech, or a Jerusalem pizza joint and kills a bunch of people, it serves no strategic purpose unless the wider world hears of it.

But of course I don't mean they are completely dead. I suppose there's always the unfortunate possibility of a resurgence. But as of now, because of military action, they are non-factors.
 
Upvote 0

JosephZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2017
4,538
4,451
Davao City
Visit site
✟305,425.00
Country
Philippines
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
You'll notice I said "modern terrorist organizations" instead of "Islamic terrorism".

Perhaps checking next time by throwing a question my way would help.
I used the term "Islamic Terrorism" because it is the face of modern terrorism and has been the primary source of terrorism over the past decade.

Islamic Terror Historic Graph trend.jpg

It's odd to me when self-flaggelating Europeans attribute everything bad that happens in the world to themselves.

It's fascinating to see people so vastly overestimate the importance of their ancestors actions while simultaneously infantilizing literally everyone else. It's both condescending and factually incorrect.
There is no denying that western intervention in the Middle East has led to an increase in terrorist activities in that region. Conflict is the primary driver of terrorism, and had the US and its allies not invaded Iraq and Afghanistan, there wouldn't have been such dramatic increases in terrorist incidents in those countries. This is a fact. With the exception of the period surrounding the first Gulf War, terrorism in Iraq and Afghanistan was a relatively rare occurrence prior to the US-led invasions of those countries.

western intervention iraq and afghanistan.jpg

I am going to ask what sort of result do you think would happen had no intervention happened at all though. Do you imagine all these regions, with their longstanding and complex rivalries against each other wouldn't have resulted in some 100-200 years of inter-factional warfare? If so....why?

For example....do you think the PKK is the result of too much Western support to the Kurds, not enough support of the Kurds, etc?
Anything I could say on this subject would be pure speculation.
I have no idea where you're pulling these graphs from and I'm just going to point out they seem pretty garbage given the fact that the very definition of a terrorist group has likewise shifted wildly over time
I created the graphs using data from the Global Terrorism Database (GTD) provided by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START). The definition of a terrorist group has remained fairly consistant over time. A terrorist group is defined as being a nonstate actor that uses illegal force and/or violence to attain a political, economic, religious, or social goal.

it seems rather clear the internet and it's advent throughout the middle east has had a bigger impact on Islamic terrorism (specifically) than any "western intervention".
The rise in terrorism in the Middle East is not related to the arrival of the internet. It is directly related to violence and conflict.

Researchers at the Institute for Economics and Peace have combed the GTD data for patterns and identified two features common to countries where terrorism thrives. According to their research, 92 percent of all terrorist attacks in the past 25 years have occurred in countries with widespread state-sponsored political violence, while 88 percent of attacks have occurred in places with violent conflicts.

“The link between these two factors and terrorism is so strong that less than 0.6 per cent of all terrorist attacks have occurred in countries without any ongoing conflict and any form of political terror,” the researchers write in the 2015 Global Terrorism Index Report.

In most Muslim-majority countries with a significant level of terrorist activity, one or both of these features are present.
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
The US didn't use that strategy. The US did what Israel is doing now. The US bombed, invaded, and occupied Afghanistan and later did the same in Iraq. The results have been disastrous. Not only did the US not defeat al Qaeda, it lead to the creation of the Islamic State and historic levels of terrorism. Just look how much terrorism increased in Afghanistan and Iraq after the US attempted to destroy al Qaeda with military force.
You are wrong. The US built hospitals, schools, provided medical care and other infrastructure projects. They tried to liberalize the gov't and elevate women and girls to a higher level. All to no avail. It is hard to convince people you are the 'good guys' when the bad guys put a gun to their heads and say 'join us or else'. Naturally they chose the join offer. Neither hamas or al-qaeda can be totally destroyed unless you can figure out a way to eradicate an ideology. However, al-qaeda has been reduced to a sideshow and no longer dominates the news cycle as they once did(Whatever Happened to Al Qaeda?).
Hamas hates the Jews; any Jew anywhere and there is no changing that. They have indoctrinated those arabs they come in contract with down to indoctrination of anti-semitism in their school systems (as do many of the other arab states). Therefore they must be destroyed until they also become just a sideshow and unable to really cause much harm because they can no longer control nations. The really hard part is to teach the Gazans, West Bankers and the larger arab world to stop their unreasoning hatred of the Jews. That, IMO, is a far more difficult and long term problem.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Valletta
Upvote 0

JosephZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2017
4,538
4,451
Davao City
Visit site
✟305,425.00
Country
Philippines
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
. I recall where you previously posted a chart showing where ISIS is still active. Every expert I've heard will disagree. Al Qaeda and ISIS are dead. The simple way to know this is that they're not in the news. The reason they're called "terrorists" is because they want to instill terror, and that can't be done unless news of an atrocity spreads. If a suicide bomber walks into an Indonesian discotech, or a Jerusalem pizza joint and kills a bunch of people, it serves no strategic purpose unless the wider world hears of it.

But of course I don't mean they are completely dead. I suppose there's always the unfortunate possibility of a resurgence. But as of now, because of military action, they are non-factors.
IS remained the world’s deadliest terrorist group in 2022 for the eighth consecutive year, with attacks in 21 countries, despite deaths attributed to the group and its affiliates slightly declining from 2,194 to 1,833 deaths.

Attacks by IS and its affiliates represented 27 per cent of all terrorism deaths globally in 2022. IS attacks occurred in five of nine regions: South Asia, MENA, sub-Saharan Africa, Russia and Eurasia, and Asia-Pacific. The country most affected by IS terrorist attacks was Iraq, recording 183 attacks in 2022... IS maintained its level of terrorist activity in Syria with approximately the same number of attacks.

The deadliest attack attributed to IS in 2022 was a ten-day attack on Syria’s Al-Sina prison in January 2022. Two explosive-laden truck bombs were planted outside the walls of the prison, allowing at least 200 gunmen to storm the facility as a riot took place inside. At least 154 Syrian Democratic Forces personnel were killed and 120 more wounded. It was also the deadliest attack attributed to any terror group in 2022.

Armed attacks continued to be IS’ favoured tactic for the fourth consecutive year, followed by explosive attacks. In 2022, 398 armed attacks resulted in 1,098 deaths.


 
Upvote 0

JosephZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2017
4,538
4,451
Davao City
Visit site
✟305,425.00
Country
Philippines
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
You are wrong. The US built hospitals, schools, provided medical care and other infrastructure projects. They tried to liberalize the gov't and elevate women and girls to a higher level. All to know avail. It is hard to convince people you are the 'good guys' when the bad guys put a gun to their heads and say 'join us or else'.
It's hard to convince people you're the good guys after you destroy their homeland and kill their loved ones. Building schools and improving infrastructure is little consolation to those whose lives you have destroyed and continue to destroy. Had the US worked to improve the lives of Afgans and Iraqis while simultaneously focusing on hunting down the terrorists through law enforcement methods and targeting individual terrorists and their leadership, then perhaps the ideology behind al Quada could have been defeated and the rise of ISIS would have never occurred.
 
Upvote 0

Chesterton

Whats So Funny bout Peace Love and Understanding
Site Supporter
May 24, 2008
26,237
21,445
Flatland
✟1,082,634.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
IS remained the world’s deadliest terrorist group in 2022 for the eighth consecutive year, with attacks in 21 countries, despite deaths attributed to the group and its affiliates slightly declining from 2,194 to 1,833 deaths.

Attacks by IS and its affiliates represented 27 per cent of all terrorism deaths globally in 2022. IS attacks occurred in five of nine regions: South Asia, MENA, sub-Saharan Africa, Russia and Eurasia, and Asia-Pacific. The country most affected by IS terrorist attacks was Iraq, recording 183 attacks in 2022... IS maintained its level of terrorist activity in Syria with approximately the same number of attacks.

The deadliest attack attributed to IS in 2022 was a ten-day attack on Syria’s Al-Sina prison in January 2022. Two explosive-laden truck bombs were planted outside the walls of the prison, allowing at least 200 gunmen to storm the facility as a riot took place inside. At least 154 Syrian Democratic Forces personnel were killed and 120 more wounded. It was also the deadliest attack attributed to any terror group in 2022.

Armed attacks continued to be IS’ favoured tactic for the fourth consecutive year, followed by explosive attacks. In 2022, 398 armed attacks resulted in 1,098 deaths.


The fact that you have to dredge up unknown statistics only confirms my point. There was an old idea about the Italian mafia in America that said "as long as they're only killing each other, we don't care". The same could be said of the Mexican drug cartels. The same can be said of the Sunni and Shia Muslims, who've been killing each other ever since the day after Muhammad was murdered. I know it may sound callous, but it's only when groups like these spread their violence into our world, the civilized world, that they matter, and have to be dealt with militarily.
 
Upvote 0

Vanellus

Newbie
Sep 15, 2014
1,657
601
✟159,763.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Al Shifa hospital suspends operations, baby dies: Gaza health ministry

Al Shifa hospital suspends operations, baby dies: Gaza health ministry​


GAZA, Nov 11 (Reuters) - The spokesperson for the Gaza health ministry said that operations in Al Shifa hospital complex, the largest in the Palestinian enclave, were suspended on Saturday after it ran out of fuel

"As a result, one newborn baby died inside the incubator, where there are 45 babies," Ashraf Al-Qidra, the spokesman for the Health Ministry in Hamas-controlled Gaza told Reuters.

Israel's military, which residents said had been fighting Hamas gunmen all night in and around Gaza City where the hospital is located, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

MSN

Premature babies die as Gaza’s al-Shifa hospital loses power amid alleged IDF attacks​

At least two babies have died in Gaza’s largest hospital as a result of downed electricity, as Israel continues to allegedly bombard the al-Shifa hospital, multiple sources said on Saturday.

"As a result of the lack of electricity, we can report that the neonatal intensive care unit has stopped working. Two premature infants have died, and there is a real risk to the lives of 37 other premature infants,” Physicians for Human Rights Israel said in a statement, describing the al-Shifa hospital as “besieged.”

Latest reports are that three premature babies have died now.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
28,075
9,036
65
✟429,339.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Acts of terrorism increased because the region was destabilized and became a breeding ground for terrorist recruitment. The war against terrorists ended up creating more terrorists. After a twenty-year US occupation of Afghanistan, the Taliban has been growing in numbers and strength in recent years and has been responsible for a surge in terrorism in Pakistan. Prior to the US invasion of Iraq, there was no ISIS. But after the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and the collapse of the Iraqi government, ISIS and several other new terror groups emerged. Unfortunately, the end result of Israel's war against Hamas will be no different.

The US invaded Afghanistan to destroy Al-Qaeda. The Taliban refused to hand over Osama bin Laden, so they also became a target.

Afghanistan, a known training ground and safe haven for the terrorist group [al-Qaeda] led by Osama bin Laden, became the initial focus of military efforts to strike back. That distant, land-locked, mountainous country presented great challenges to planners and operators. The U.S. Army, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Navy overcame those obstacles to project power halfway across the globe and conduct an offensive, in concert with Afghan allies, which drove al-Qaeda into retreat and quickly toppled the Taliban regime that supported the terrorists.

War with al-Qaeda meant war with its host the Taliban who had gained control of most of Afghanistan in the 1990s. In October 2001, U.S. military forces began a campaign against both groups. With the help of various anti-Taliban militias, American troops fought to remove the Taliban from power, destroy al-Qaeda, find bin Laden, and preclude terrorists from using Afghanistan as a refuge. Afghanistan, therefore, would be the first conflict in the decades-long Global War on Terrorism.

From Afghanistan, bin Laden and his al-Qaeda network planned and set in motion the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks on New York City and the Pentagon. He wanted to draw the United States into a protracted and unwinnable war in Afghanistan, much as the Soviets had been... the Taliban likely did not know of these plans.

Within hours after the World Trade Center’s twin towers fell in New York City, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) reported that al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden had planned and orchestrated the attacks from their sanctuary in Afghanistan. Bush and his cabinet then learned that the Taliban was hosting and protecting bin Laden. Going to war with al-Qaeda would require fighting the Taliban.



Hamas used the same strategy as Bin Laden. They knew going into the terror attack on October 7th that Israel would respond with overwhelming force in Gaza and get caught up in a long, unwinnable war. It was a trap, and Israel fell right into it.


I didn't say the war in Iraq was against al Qaeda, I said the US did the same in Iraq; bombed, invaded, and occupied the country.


From northwest Africa to southeast Asia, al-Qa`ida has maintained a global movement of some two dozen local networks. Among the movement’s estimated 20,000 or so men-at-arms are some 3,500-5,000 hardcore loyalists in Syria belonging to al-Qa`ida’s main stalking horse in that country, Hurras al-Din. Longstanding al-Qa`ida loyalists like al-Shabaab in Somalia and al-Qa`ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) in Yemen each command approximately 7,000 men, with several hundred associated with al-Qa`ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM). There are estimated to be at least 400-600 al-Qa`ida fighters in Afghanistan.

Evidence that al-Qa`ida and its franchises have not abandoned prospects of reinvigorating their campaign of international terrorism with some new, dramatic, and spectacular attack may be deduced from the reports that twice this past year, al-Shabaab operatives have been arrested while taking flying lessons: one in 2019 in the Philippines and the other earlier this year in an undisclosed African country. The former had researched skyscrapers in the United States and aviation security as well as taking flying lessons in a plot that is believed to have commenced in 2016.

The December 2019 shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola in Florida was not only the first deadly terrorist attack on U.S. soil coordinated by a foreign terrorist organization since 9/11, it was perpetrated by an individual embedded within the Saudi Air Force, with whom AQAP had been in contact while he was on U.S. territory, up to and including the night before the attack.

Al-Qa`ida and its affiliates have not laid down their arms, nor do they have any intent to spare the United States in their ongoing jihad. Accordingly, they likely see themselves poised to benefit from any diminishment or indeed the complete withdrawal of U.S. military forces from Afghanistan, Africa, and elsewhere.



Al Qaeda is currently expanding its global presence, the Islamic State continues to be the deadliest terror group in the world, and the Taliban is probably stronger today than it was prior to the U.S. invasion in 2001. Military action clearly isn't a viable solution when it comes to eliminating terrorist groups.
You proved my point that Al Qaeda is greatly diminished. Due to our actions. They may not have abandoned their actions but they are not the force they were.

And I'm not the only one to point out the Taliban came back because we did NOT do what needed to be done. We let them escape in Pakistan. If you let them escape you haven't defeated them. And as long as we were in Afghanistan they never came back. But we had a chance to do something about them and didn't because we fought a politically correct war.

And you didn't actually disprove my terrorism point. Of course there were more terrorism attacks during the war. It makes perfect sense. The terrorists were trying to defeat us.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
28,075
9,036
65
✟429,339.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
But good job putting words into my mouth and pretending I was anti-israel by focusing on three words of my post. Really appreciate that.

No words mean things. And the way you worded it along with the rest of your post led me to that place.

So I thank you for clarifying that it is Hamas that is the one at fault here.

Citizens will die due to the actions of Hamas.
 
Upvote 0