I do. You do not considering you said they are the same.Do you honestly not know the difference between dqsh and drag queen shows?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I do. You do not considering you said they are the same.Do you honestly not know the difference between dqsh and drag queen shows?
That's funny considering I've been trying to discuss children at drag queen shows being banned, and basically complained about dqsh being brought into it over and over.I do. You do not considering you said they are the same.
The law in question bans male or female impersonators, and that includes Drag Queen Story Time, which is not burlesque. Tennessee already has obscenity laws on the books, so this law does nothing more but ban people in drag.That's funny considering I've been trying to discuss children at drag queen shows being banned, and basically complained about dqsh being brought into it over and over.
You can want whatever you like. Laws can certainly protect minors from 'adult' entertainment. But some of these laws defined drag to be adult, which is not only absurd, but violates First Amendment freedoms.So not wanting children to be exposed to exotic adult entertainment violates the first amendment?
According to what I've read, the Tennessee Adult Entertainment Act, banned public "adult cabaret performance" in public or in front of children in the state of Tennessee.The law in question bans male or female impersonators, and that includes Drag Queen Story Time, which is not burlesque. Tennessee already has obscenity laws on the books, so this law does nothing more but ban people in drag.
I've never heard of drag queen shows as being a venue for children. Until recently.Laws can certainly protect minors from 'adult' entertainment. But some of these laws defined drag to be adult, which is not only absurd, but violates First Amendment freedoms.
The bill as passed "remov[ed] the wording specifying that the entertainment had to appeal to the prurient interest entirely"According to what I've read, the Tennessee Adult Entertainment Act, banned public "adult cabaret performance" in public or in front of children in the state of Tennessee.
I saw no mention of drag queen story hour in the bill.
The words in the bill are,According to what I've read, the Tennessee Adult Entertainment Act, banned public "adult cabaret performance" in public or in front of children in the state of Tennessee.
I saw no mention of drag queen story hour in the bill.
"Adult cabaret entertainment": (A) Means adult-oriented performances that are harmful to minors, as that term is defined in § 39-17-901, and that feature topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators, or similar entertainers; and (B) Includes a single performance or multiple performances by an entertainerThe words in the bill are,
"male or female impersonators, or similar entertainers;"
pretty much means Drag Queens.
Drag queens entertaining children.The words in the bill are,
"male or female impersonators, or similar entertainers;"
pretty much means Drag Queens.
That doesn't matter when it's something deemed inappropriate for children.With parental (or guardian) supervision.
Those aren't exotic burlesque cabaret adult nightclub entertainment. Up until recently drag shows were always considered adult entertainment. It's only lately that there's been such a drive to have children involved in it.As written the law would ban most theater productions of Peter Pan and the last couple of Shakespeare plays I attended.
But then Shakespeare wrote a lot of things that the uncultured dislike.
It does matter, but apparently you believe the government (or religion) should take over parenting like the right wants to watch what people are doing in their own bedrooms.That doesn't matter when it's something deemed inappropriate for children.
There are laws of age restriction for children and parents have to abide by them. A parent isn't allowed to take their minor child into a bar even if the kid isn't consuming alcohol. Or have their minor child sit next to them while they play a slot machine in a casino. Or take their under 17 year old kid into a theater to see an NC-17 movie etc.It does matter, but apparently you believe the government (or religion) should take over parenting like the right wants to watch what people are doing in their own bedrooms.
I keep hearing "think of the children" but keep seeing Americans rights dwindling.
Is there really though? While "drag shows" are generally considered adult entertainment, that's due to the fact that they tend to include adult humor - there is nothing inherently "adult" about dressing up in drag. The drag-related events that are targeted (in a marketing sense) at children and families - like Drag Queen Story Hour - do not include the adult humor that makes the typical drag show "adult entertainment". I don't see anyone arguing (in any sort of organized way, at least) that children should be going to "adult entertainment" drag shows.Up until recently drag shows were always considered adult entertainment. It's only lately that there's been such a drive to have children involved in it.
So, is this an actual problem that exists in Tennessee? Are performances that actually meet those standards being performed in public spaces? If so, when and where? Or is this a law that just drives fear of such a thing happening, leading to discrimination and hatred?“Harmful to minors” means that quality of any description or representation, in whatever form, of nudity, sexual excitement, sexual conduct, excess violence or sadomasochistic abuse when the matter or performance:
- Would be found by the average person applying contemporary community standards to appeal predominantly to the prurient, shameful or morbid interests of minors;
- Is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community as a whole with respect to what is suitable for minors; and
- Taken as whole lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific values for minors;
The drag shows that I've seen have generally lived in the PG-13 to R range in terms of their explicitness. NC-17 movies are pretty much just artsy pr0n. Minors are permitted to watch R-rated movies with adult supervision.There are laws of age restriction for children and parents have to abide by them. A parent isn't allowed take their minor child into a bar even if the kid isn't consuming alcohol. Or have their minor child sit next to them while they pull a slot machine in a casino. Or take their under 17 year old kid into a theater showing an NC-17 movie.
And it is the ones who are children now who will be the ones to wake up and find all their rights are gone.It does matter, but apparently you believe the government (or religion) should take over parenting like the right wants to watch what people are doing in their own bedrooms.
I keep hearing "think of the children" but keep seeing Americans rights dwindling.
I have seen many children in bars with their parents. Parents don't take children to bars without food, but many bars sell alcohol and food. A parent certainly is allowed to take their children into a bar if the bar sells food, at least in the state where I live.There are laws of age restriction for children and parents have to abide by them. A parent isn't allowed to take their minor child into a bar even if the kid isn't consuming alcohol. Or have their minor child sit next to them while they play a slot machine in a casino. Or take their under 17 year old kid into a theater to see an NC-17 movie etc.
You have the right not to take your kids to places, that dress up in drag . And kids and adults have been watching this stuff on TV for a long time.A good way to gloss over something and downplay it, is saying that there are bigger things to be concerned about, and people are overreacting, and being hysterical etc. But I think you made the real reason for supporting it obvious; which is because Christians object to it.
There's more to it that, which I'm sure you know. But since Christians don't want it happening, that's why it needs to happen.