• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

We Live In An Electrical Simulation

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,417
28,841
Pacific Northwest
✟808,707.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Chuck Missler is no heretic.

Perhaps not. I never accused him of being a heretic.

But to say that the material universe is a false reality and that we're all living in a matrix-like simulation, well from the perspective of two thousand years of Christian teaching that is certainly heretical.

If that's what Chuck Missler taught, then he'd be teaching heresy. But just because one believes something heretical doesn't make them a heretic--to be a heretic means that one not only holds to false doctrinal positions but that they actively and knowingly resist correction and insist on sowing division in the household of faith by teaching contrary to what has been received from the beginning.

I merely am observing that pseudoscience and heresy have a track record of showing up together a lot.

The electric universe nonsense is pseudoscience; and as presented in this thread, is presented in such a way as to advocate for what Christianity has always deemed heretical nonsense.

In this thread this particular form of pseudoscience is being used to promote a view which denies the very first statement in the Apostles' and Nicene Creeds, "We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, of all things seen and unseen" From a Christian perspective, that's a serious problem.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Divide

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2017
2,577
1,230
63
Columbus
✟96,221.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
In this thread this particular form of pseudoscience is being used to promote a view which denies the very first statement in the Apostles' and Nicene Creeds, "We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, of all things seen and unseen" From a Christian perspective, that's a serious problem.

Now that seems weird. Why would you say that?
 
Upvote 0

Divide

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2017
2,577
1,230
63
Columbus
✟96,221.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
God didn't make a fake simulation of reality.

-CryptoLutheran

I think what you are missing is that if you are of the world and see things in a carnal way (everything you can see touch smell and so forth) is only the material world. The spiritual Kingdom of God has more reality in it than earth's material world. What did they say? Our material reality is but 5% of total reality. Which makes the spiritual realm the other 95%.

Scripture tells us to look to the unseen, does it not? Why does it say that? Uh, because there is something there.

2 Corinthians 4:18
18 While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.../KJV

Maybe the scientists call it the electrical field or whatever, it's still the spiritual realm. Maybe that was bad term to use? One thing is for certain. There's more going on on this earth than meets the eye. Scripture says the same thing.

I've heard several different testimonies of people who got to be taken up in spirit, and they all say, it felt more like home than earth does. That it seemed more real. Many new colors that we don't have on earth, all sorts of stuff.

So it sounds like you would do good to look at life from a spiritual perspective in faith, than putting your confidence in carnal knowledge of the world. I think if you don't then you're only able to ever see the 5% of true reality.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,417
28,841
Pacific Northwest
✟808,707.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
I think what you are missing is that if you are of the world and see things in a carnal way (everything you can see touch smell and so forth) is only the material world. The spiritual Kingdom of God has more reality in it than earth's material world. What did they say? Our material reality is but 5% of total reality. Which makes the spiritual realm the other 95%.

Again, this is heresy. What you just said, that's heretical. You are advancing matter-spirit dualism. If you want me to provide a more expansive response to this paragraph, then we can do that in a more appropriate theological forum.

Scripture tells us to look to the unseen, does it not? Why does it say that? Uh, because there is something there.

2 Corinthians 4:18
18 While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.../KJV

Maybe the scientists call it the electrical field or whatever, it's still the spiritual realm. Maybe that was bad term to use? One thing is for certain. There's more going on on this earth than meets the eye. Scripture says the same thing.

I've heard several different testimonies of people who got to be taken up in spirit, and they all say, it felt more like home than earth does. That it seemed more real. Many new colors that we don't have on earth, all sorts of stuff.

So it sounds like you would do good to look at life from a spiritual perspective in faith, than putting your confidence in carnal knowledge of the world. I think if you don't then you're only able to ever see the 5% of true reality.

You've completely butchered what Paul is saying in 2 Corinthians 4:18 if you think he is advocating a dualistic universe of matter and spirit. Paul is, of course, talking about how the afflictions he and his apostolic companions face for the sake of preaching the Gospel are nothing compared to the hope that they have of what is to come. Not as spirit above matter; but as hope rooted in faith in God's promise about future redemption and resurrection vs the present experience of suffering and death. Don't believe me? Go ahead and read the entirety of the chapter and see for yourself.

Again, what you are proposing is nothing more than ancient Gnostic dualism, and it is heretical. Even your appeal to Paul to justify this is an example of how ancient Gnostic leaders like Valentinius and Basilides sought to use Paul for their purposes. There are things in Paul's letters which some early Gnostics sought to exploit. This is exactly what 2 Peter 3:16 is talking about.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

Divide

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2017
2,577
1,230
63
Columbus
✟96,221.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Again, this is heresy. What you just said, that's heretical. You are advancing matter-spirit dualism. If you want me to provide a more expansive response to this paragraph, then we can do that in a more appropriate theological forum.

I've never heard the term matter-spirit dualism. All you have done is to call me a heretic who speaks heresy. Why is it heresy? Your point is so vague that it makes me wonder what the point is.

if you think he is advocating a dualistic universe of matter and spirit.

Maybe you better define what you mean here. That the material world along with the natural realm exists at the same time as the Kingdom of God (spiritual realm), is not true? How can that be? Is there a spiritual realm? Is there or is there not a Kingdom of God?

You lost me. I have no idea what led you to think that, and you did not even explain what you meant. If that was even what you meant?

I don't know anything about any ancient Gnostics or anything like that. I study the Lord and the scriptures. I am christian. Truth is always easy enough to state. So it escapes me why you would not (if what you say is true. and I am wrong)

Wrong about what exactly? Oh that's Heresy! What is Heresy? Scripture Verses please?
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,417
28,841
Pacific Northwest
✟808,707.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
I've never heard the term matter-spirit dualism.

Dualism is the division of two concepts in opposition or contrast to each other. Matter-spirit dualism is a dualism in which matter and spirit are two opposing concepts, two principles at odds with one another.

Contextually here it comes with the notion that "spirit" is more real and superior in comparison to matter. An example of matter-spirit dualism would be to say that the human soul is an ethereal reality that is superior to, or more real than the body; as though the body were merely a shell, a vessel, or even a prison within which the soul dwells; such an idea might say, for example, that only the soul really matters and that the body doesn't really matter. The body will die, but the soul live on for eternity as a body-less free spirit and in this state the person is most real, or true as to what they are--the body as merely a shell which houses the soul isn't really the person, the soul is the person and to be free of the shackles of the body is a superior condition than being stuck in the body. That's an example of what matter-spirit dualism would look like.

In the case of ancient Gnostic views of reality, the material universe isn't entirely real. In fact, it's a veil of ignorance, deceit, falseness that was forced upon intelligent spiritual beings. To exist in the body is a terrible and awful tragedy that was imposed upon these beings. The highest power, God or Monad, exists in a perfect, free, limitless and eternal realm of divine spirit. As one gets further away from this perfect being, one eventually loses sight of the truth of God as God is, and furthest away is being imprisoned in these disgusting prisons of bodily matter, in a world that is just a kind of "Matrix" which hides the truth of true reality. And if one can simply learn the truth of the world, that it's all just a kind of simulation or false reality that we've been imprisoned in, and learn of the true God far removed from this lowly debased matter and who exists in the fullness of perfect spiritual reality--then we can be saved, rescued, from this lowly and bodily estate, and our true selves, our souls/spirits can return and find home in the fullness of that God and Monad from which ultimately we descend and must return.

Thus the table which you touch, see, and feel, is just lowly matter, it's not what's really real. It's just part of this veil of matter making us ignorant of our true selves as emanations of the one God; and it is a false god that keeps us ignorant, believing that these bodies of flesh, and the experiences we experience here in this world of matter are real and truly significant. I am not my body, I am not this crude matter but a luminous being that must overcome this body and matter and the ignorance they create, and receive the true knowledge of myself and the falsehood of this world that I might achieve that salvation and victory over matter.

Is that understandable enough?

All you have done is to call me a heretic

I don't believe I've called you a heretic. I've said that what you are advancing here is heresy.

who speaks heresy. Why is it heresy? Your point is so vague that it makes me wonder what the point is.

Because the material world is good, it's real, and God made it. The table in front of me is real, the matter that makes up that table is real. Not only is it real, it's good. The trees that sprouted from seeds in the ground are part of a universe of touch, feel, and see (for creatures granted sense) which God made, and it is good. The atoms, even their subatomic components and the forces of the cosmos that bring those subatomic particles together and make matter possible: That is God's good creation. He made you and me as solid creatures of fleshy matter, from the Hydrogen, Oxygen, and Carbon which makes up the building blocks of every single one of our cells; including the grey matter which is situated between our ears in which neurons fire electrical signals, and create a chemical soup of communication with which we learn how to speak, harness reason, interpret the world we experience through our sensory input, form memories, and have a sense of self--that there is an I; and conversely, there is an I, and there is a you. And this mind, this self, this consciousness which recognizes I and you and the distinction interacts with you, and you are another I apart from me. And all of this happens in a wider, larger, complex universe--a cosmic arrangement of everything phenomenal that has, does, or will exist. In which stars are born from the gravitational condensing of gas, of matter out there within the universe, in a particular space, and at a particular time. Stars are born, through intense gravitational forces, these gigantic furnaces of superhot gas continue for a time, producing immense quantities of energy and light. And on a congolomerate of rock which was forged in the aftermath of one of these stars, you and I exist having this conversation. And all of this is real. And more importantly, it is good. And God made it all.

"We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, of all things seen and unseen."
"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth."

Since that is true, then to suggest that this world is not good, is inferior, isn't actually real, is to deny the truth: That everything exists exists, and is real and good.

Maybe you better define what you mean here. That the material world along with the natural realm exists at the same time as the Kingdom of God (spiritual realm), is not true? How can that be? Is there a spiritual realm? Is there or is there not a Kingdom of God?

Well, first of all, the kingdom of God isn't a spiritual realm. The phrase "kingdom of God", and it's counterpart "kingdom of Heaven" are ways to describe that God is King. Every time you read Jesus say "kingdom of God/Heaven", think "When God is King" or "This is what it's like for God to be King". When Jesus says--for example that the greatest in the kingdom is a slave, it means the way God is King, when God is King, the slave holds the highest station, God's way is backward and upside down to ours. God's rule recognizes the least as greatest, the last as first, the smallest as the largest. That's very different to our understanding of kingdom, of rule, of power and authority--our way is that the strong dominate the weak, but God's way is that the weak are greater than the strong. God chose, Paul says, that which is weak and foolish by the standards of human kingdom and power in order to show that human wisdom is foolish and human strength is weak. It is not the king, crowned and adorned with gold and diamonds sitting on a throne lording over peasants and poor who God thinks is greatest, it's that slave, that peasant, it's the little nobody that God thinks is greatest.

That's what the kingdom of God is. The kingdom of God is God as King, and it looks totally backward and upsidedown to our typical views of power and right. For God, might does not make right; He who lives by the sword dies by the sword. But take up your cross, and die; for whoever gives their life away shall find it; but whoever keeps it shall lose it. What does it profit a man to gain the whole world, but forfeit his soul?

You lost me. I have no idea what led you to think that, and you did not even explain what you meant. If that was even what you meant?

I don't know anything about any ancient Gnostics or anything like that. I study the Lord and the scriptures. I am christian. Truth is always easy enough to state. So it escapes me why you would not (if what you say is true. and I am wrong)

Wrong about what exactly? Oh that's Heresy! What is Heresy? Scripture Verses please?

Well, now, hopefully, you know more.

-CryptoLutheran
 
  • Like
Reactions: prodromos
Upvote 0

Divide

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2017
2,577
1,230
63
Columbus
✟96,221.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Is that understandable enough?

So that's two different viewpoints?

I don't believe I've called you a heretic. I've said that what you are advancing here is heresy.

Isn't one who speaks heresy a heretic?

Since that is true, then to suggest that this world is not good, is inferior, isn't actually real, is to deny the truth: That everything exists exists, and is real and good.

WHo said it isn't real to us? I said that the material world is 5% of reality and the spiritual realm is the other 95%.

Well, first of all, the kingdom of God isn't a spiritual realm. The phrase "kingdom of God", and it's counterpart "kingdom of Heaven" are ways to describe that God is King. Every time you read Jesus say "kingdom of God/Heaven", think "When God is King" or "This is what it's like for God to be King". When Jesus says--for example that the greatest in the kingdom is a slave, it means the way God is King, when God is King, the slave holds the highest station, God's way is backward and upside down to ours. God's rule recognizes the least as greatest, the last as first, the smallest as the largest. That's very different to our understanding of kingdom, of rule, of power and authority--our way is that the strong dominate the weak, but God's way is that the weak are greater than the strong. God chose, Paul says, that which is weak and foolish by the standards of human kingdom and power in order to show that human wisdom is foolish and human strength is weak. It is not the king, crowned and adorned with gold and diamonds sitting on a throne lording over peasants and poor who God thinks is greatest, it's that slave, that peasant, it's the little nobody that God thinks is greatest.

That's what the kingdom of God is. The kingdom of God is God as King, and it looks totally backward and upsidedown to our typical views of power and right. For God, might does not make right; He who lives by the sword dies by the sword. But take up your cross, and die; for whoever gives their life away shall find it; but whoever keeps it shall lose it. What does it profit a man to gain the whole world, but forfeit his soul?

What in the world are you talking about? You don't thik it's possible to live a spiritual life while in a material world?

Well, now, hopefully, you know more.

Not really. You said a lot of things. Quite a few scriptures came to mind as I was readng that to me said you have a few things wrong. I don't wanna argue though, but I'll agree to disagree with you. I'm not saying you are totally wrong but we don't see eye to eye for sure.
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
39,417
28,841
Pacific Northwest
✟808,707.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
So that's two different viewpoints?

No, that's what matter-spirit dualism is. A dualism--a contrast and opposition between--spirit and matter. The view that matter is lowly, inferior, and bad; and that spirit is higher, superior, and good.

Isn't one who speaks heresy a heretic?

Not necessarily. In the history of Christianity a heretic is specifically a person who knowingly teaches and promotes something that is at odds with orthodox Christian teaching.

Lots of Christians have a faulty understanding of the Trinity, that happens a lot because it's often not taught very well, and so lots of people who are devout faithful believers have a bad understanding of the Trinity. And because of that, they may hold to ideas which are heretical--but they don't know that what they believe is heretical. That doesn't make them a heretic, that just makes them unaware of good theology. If, however, a person with a bad understanding of the Trinity upon hearing the orthodox teaching on the Trinity refused to have their view corrected and then actively started teaching contrary to the orthodox view, creating a divisive atmosphere in their church, trying to get others to come over to their wrong opinion--then that would make them a heretic.

A heretic actively, knowingly teaches heresy and sows division within the Body. Intrinsic to heresy being a problem is when it creates discord and animosity within the Body, creation division and factionalism that disturbs and disrupts the unity of Christian faith and confession.

Simply being wrong, theologically, doesn't make one a heretic; actively opposing clearly defined and accepted confession and teaching which the universal Christian Church has always held as true and essential to a healthy understanding of God, creation, human beings, and how all of that relates together in the story of redemption--that's being a heretic. Being a heretic is saying, "I know better than everyone else, and I'm going to follow my own way and reject everything else".

WHo said it isn't real to us? I said that the material world is 5% of reality and the spiritual realm is the other 95%.

"Real to us" comes down to the subjectivity of perception vs full, objective and ontrological reality. When I'm dreaming I can be under the impression that the images which my subconscious mind are producing is "real"--but once I wake up I become aware that the things I experienced and perceived while dreaming weren't actually real.

"Real to us" is suggesting that the material universe is analogous to a dream, to mere subjective perception. In contrast to being actually, objectively, real.

I only perceive that there is a table in front of me, as opposed to there actually being a table in front of me.

Christianity insists there actually is a table, that table is real. It is not a subjective perception; there is a real, objective thing with real existence--a table.


What in the world are you talking about? You don't thik it's possible to live a spiritual life while in a material world?

Just the opposite. I don't believe "spiritual" is a contrast with material. My "spiritual life" is not that I am a soul in a body, and that there is an unseen spiritual realm all around me; it's that

1) I'm the creation of God, created by God to have a relationship with Him,

2) though sin has estranged me from God, God has overcome that by His love and grace, and shares His life with me by reconciling me to Himself through the Person and work of Jesus Christ and that I have God the Holy Spirit Himself sharing Himself with me by indwelling me and granting me faith to believe and know God the Father through the only-begotten Son, Jesus Christ; and

3) by the grace of God I am being renewed and restored with the hope and promise that even as Jesus was raised from the dead bodily, so will I be raised from the dead bodily and God is going to take this world, injured by sin and death and all wrongs which injure the good creation of God, and set all things to rights. Even the dirt under our feet is destined for glory by God's grace and love through Jesus Christ.

Not really. You said a lot of things. Quite a few scriptures came to mind as I was readng that to me said you have a few things wrong. I don't wanna argue though, but I'll agree to disagree with you. I'm not saying you are totally wrong but we don't see eye to eye for sure.

I no doubt believe you had several Scriptures come to mind, but have you properly exegeted those passages to see if how you understand them is actually correct. Recall, you quoted 2 Corinthians 4:18 earlier, but that passage did not say what you suggested it said. Exegetically, it was saying something very different.

Biblical fidelity is not found by merely quoting the Bible; it requires the hard work of exegesis so that our understanding of the text is in line with the intended meaning of the text. To that end, I'd be more than happy to provide a biblical defense of orthodox Christian teaching.

I still think we should be having this conversation somewhere else. Our conversation in this thread has nothing to do with science and so the science board really isn't appropriate for this conversation. If you'd like to create a new topic in another board, then we can get into this conversation a lot deeper.

-CryptoLutheran
 
  • Like
Reactions: prodromos
Upvote 0

Divide

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2017
2,577
1,230
63
Columbus
✟96,221.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
No, that's what matter-spirit dualism is. A dualism--a contrast and opposition between--spirit and matter. The view that matter is lowly, inferior, and bad; and that spirit is higher, superior, and good.

Is that what spirit dualism is. That's not what I was talking about. Matter is not inherently bad or lowly. The Spirit may indeed be superior because the matter was created by the Spirit. What makes you think that in the spiritual realm there are not, spiritual bodies. Or interdimensional bodies?

Not necessarily. In the history of Christianity a heretic is specifically a person who knowingly teaches and promotes something that is at odds with orthodox Christian teaching.

Oh, ok. I get it. So you were saying not that I am a heretic but that what I spoke may be heresy. Sorry about that.

Real to us" comes down to the subjectivity of perception vs full, objective and ontrological reality. When I'm dreaming I can be under the impression that the images which my subconscious mind are producing is "real"--but once I wake up I become aware that the things I experienced and perceived while dreaming weren't actually real.

"Real to us" is suggesting that the material universe is analogous to a dream, to mere subjective perception. In contrast to being actually, objectively, real.

I have always been taught that the road to God is a battle of the mind. I admit, I do not see a contrast where you do. More of a partnership than a contrast. You sound as if you don't believe in the spiritual realm or think it's where everything is etherial. And that is not so. Jesus said, the Kingdom is at hand. Look to the unseen. Understand how it fits in to the big picture.

I once heard one of those scientist types (I forget who) that said our entire life is spent 95% thinking and the other 5% of the time we're actually doing something (outside of ourselves) IOW, not thinking. Sometimes I think while driving. So if I am inside thinking then I'm not driving the truck. WHo's driving the truck?! My sub-conscious is driving, having been programmed to drive and even knows the way. Then he postulated that, what if our thoughts are the only real substance that we have as humans? What if, faith is the substance of that which we can not see.

So to me, I am able to see that we could indeed be being put through a mental exercise. And we wouldn't even know it. Like you said, a dream seems real until you wake up.

Just the opposite. I don't believe "spiritual" is a contrast with material. My "spiritual life" is not that I am a soul in a body, and that there is an unseen spiritual realm all around me; it's that

Oh, so up above you were just telling me about spirit matter dualism but you don't agree with it is what you are saying here?

You are NOT a soul in a body in the middle of an unseen spiritual realm?

1) I'm the creation of God, created by God to have a relationship with Him,

2) though sin has estranged me from God, God has overcome that by His love and grace, and shares His life with me by reconciling me to Himself through the Person and work of Jesus Christ and that I have God the Holy Spirit Himself sharing Himself with me by indwelling me and granting me faith to believe and know God the Father through the only-begotten Son, Jesus Christ; and

3) by the grace of God I am being renewed and restored with the hope and promise that even as Jesus was raised from the dead bodily, so will I be raised from the dead bodily and God is going to take this world, injured by sin and death and all wrongs which injure the good creation of God, and set all things to rights. Even the dirt under our feet is destined for glory by God's grace and love through Jesus Christ.

Oh! I see. You do believe it on some level maybe but generally ignore the things of the spirit and spiritual realm to focus all of your attention on Christ Himself? I think that's ok and I can understand that viewpoint. I do focus on Jesus too, but they had a thread on some christian forum where people were trying to unpack the realities a little so I was urged to respond.

I no doubt believe you had several Scriptures come to mind, but have you properly exegeted those passages to see if how you understand them is actually correct. Recall, you quoted 2 Corinthians 4:18 earlier, but that passage did not say what you suggested it said. Exegetically, it was saying something very different.

The way I figure it, if we are supposed to worship in Spirit and in Truth, then we also need to read His word in Spirit and Truth. You don't just read it once and decipher the textual message. First off perhaps but then you read it again and look for the biblical principle that is being spoke of, then a third time to get the spirit of it or the essence so to speak.

Have you ever gotten a Rhema?

I still think we should be having this conversation somewhere else. Our conversation in this thread has nothing to do with science and so the science board really isn't appropriate for this conversation. If you'd like to create a new topic in another board, then we can get into this conversation a lot deeper.

Well I started the thread here. So I have no need to go private. Say what you want to here. It's not off topic to me and I'm the OP. SO we should be good.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,595
16,296
55
USA
✟409,953.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Well I started the thread here. So I have no need to go private. Say what you want to here. It's not off topic to me and I'm the OP. SO we should be good.

You weren't asked to take the convo to DMs. You were asked to take this off-topic side thread to an appropraite board on CF where this theology/spirituality stuff is on topic. (Bonus for you: I won't post replies to it if you take it to "Christian only".)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Divide
Upvote 0

Divide

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2017
2,577
1,230
63
Columbus
✟96,221.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You weren't asked to take the convo to DMs. You were asked to take this off-topic side thread to an appropraite board on CF where this theology/spirituality stuff is on topic. (Bonus for you: I won't post replies to it if you take it to "Christian only".)

Hey that would be a bonus! I'll handle it though.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,595
16,296
55
USA
✟409,953.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Well sir, that's the breaks on a Christian board. Not sure what you expected to find here.

Your theological discussion isn't on topic for this sub-forum. It has nothing to do with science. There are other places on CF for such things.
 
Upvote 0

Divide

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2017
2,577
1,230
63
Columbus
✟96,221.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Your theological discussion isn't on topic for this sub-forum. It has nothing to do with science. There are other places on CF for such things.

WHo's thread am I messing up? Who is the OP?Let's ask him. Oh! I am the OP. This is ok for this thread as far as I am concerned. If you find anything in this thread objectionable to yourself then kindly don't read it or respond to it. See? Easy schmeesy problem solved f you could talk yourself into being silent.

It doesn't concern you? Fine. Stop posting in this thread. How dense are you going to be?
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,595
16,296
55
USA
✟409,953.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
WHo's thread am I messing up? Who is the OP?Let's ask him. Oh! I am the OP. This is ok for this thread as far as I am concerned. If you find anything in this thread objectionable to yourself then kindly don't read it or respond to it. See? Easy schmeesy problem solved f you could talk yourself into being silent.

It doesn't concern you? Fine. Stop posting in this thread. How dense are you going to be?

So you clearly do understand how to start a thread. You could start one on the theology where it is appropriate, or you could return to the title you gave the thread and discuss the universe as an electric simulation.
 
Upvote 0

Divide

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2017
2,577
1,230
63
Columbus
✟96,221.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
So you clearly do understand how to start a thread. You could start one on the theology where it is appropriate, or you could return to the title you gave the thread and discuss the universe as an electric simulation.

Why should I? When the discussion leans more towards a mix of theology at the same time, you go quiet. And that was nice while it lasted. But I am a Christian and so it's almost impossible to not have Jesus on the lips during many many conversations.

What else do you expect on a Christian Forum Board?! You want to as an Atheist and purported scientist, come on this board and insult my God and Christians and try to tell me what to do in my thread? Ha! You go butt out buddy. No sale. I reject everything you say. You darn well know the truth and I've proved it by scripture.

There's many other thread for you to read in this forum. Calm down, take a chill pill. And be polite.
 
Upvote 0

Divide

Well-Known Member
Apr 19, 2017
2,577
1,230
63
Columbus
✟96,221.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You weren't asked to take the convo to DMs. You were asked to take this off-topic side thread to an appropraite board on CF where this theology/spirituality stuff is on topic. (Bonus for you: I won't post replies to it if you take it to "Christian only".)

You can't threaten me, mr PhD, lol. You are not even a Moderator, but a mere rocket scientists, lol! So lost in all your calculations and stuff that you are missing many of the big truths of life. My job isnt to talk rocket science with you. My job is to sprinkle my Lords name all throughout every conversation. In that way perhaps there is another lost soul that is seeking and doesn't have a bad attitude like you. He may read my words and then pray to the Lord and be saved? It can happen.

You make me glad that I never went to college. If I had gone, I might be like you now. No faith in anything.

Romans 12:2
2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God..../

That's you. College educated, intelligent in all the ways of the world! Conformed to this worlds image. Do you realize what you are missing?!
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,595
16,296
55
USA
✟409,953.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
You can't threaten me, mr PhD, lol. You are not even a Moderator, but a mere rocket scientists, lol!
Rocket *surgeon*, please.
So lost in all your calculations and stuff that you are missing many of the big truths of life. My job isnt to talk rocket science with you.
You came to the science sub-section of CF. Is it too much to create and discuss threads on science (or at least pseudoscience, like electric universe)?
My job is to sprinkle my Lords name all throughout every conversation. In that way perhaps there is another lost soul that is seeking and doesn't have a bad attitude like you. He may read my words and then pray to the Lord and be saved? It can happen.
The spell is broken, I ain't goin' back.
 
Upvote 0