What part of having to answer questions about the arguments you are making is some sort of attack on you personally? As I said the last time you attempted this sort of dodge, the only reason I even have to use the word "you" (which I have tried to make clear in several replies means "the general you", in the sense of "anyone who argues like this", not "you, individual poster", since I don't know you from Adam) is that you are the one who has dismissed quotes from the fathers in this very thread that are against what you are preaching instead as being or not being part of original Christianity, which you have claimed in certain replies to be guided by your readings of the fathers. Other people (most other people) read the fathers and don't come away with the idea that it's "worshipping" St. Mary to call her Theotokos because that's what she is, or to offer praises to her on that account, or to ask for her intercession, the same as we praise any other saint for what God has worked within them, and the same as we ask for their intercessions, as we know that the saints are alive in Christ and have already gone where we wish to go. So don't tell me "I'm not on trial here" as though I'm trying to make this about you as a person because I'm trying to see how it is that your arguments are supposed fit together, because it's really not clear how they do. I follow our teacher St. Dioscorus who famously said before his accusers at Chalcedon that his concern is for the faith and not for any one man. Indeed you are not the issue here; the incoherence of your arguments, however, is.