House releases overview of evidence against Biden

[NxNW]

the White House claimed that Joe never participated in Hunter's business. Now as more evidence is revealed they claim there is no "direct evidence."

I haven't seen any evidence at all.

Joe himself bragged about getting the prosecutor fired, that's direct evidence of one of the parts needed for bribery.

No, it's not. There's an entire thread refuting this false claim.

Similarly Hunter's Biden's statement that the big guy was right next to him as he was making demands of the Chinese is direct evidence.

No, it's not.

Both the circumstantial and direct evidence and the fact that Joe has lied are FAR more than is needed for an impeachment investigation.

So far I haven't seen any evidence, and you haven't presented any.

 

[Valletta]

I haven't seen any evidence at all.

No, it's not. There's an entire thread refuting this false claim.

No, it's not.

So far I haven't seen any evidence, and you haven't presented any.

False. It sound's like you have a misconception of the meaning of the word "evidence."

 

[BPPLEE]

So the king of disinformation is complaining about disinformation. Rich.

See post #326

 

[wing2000]

False. It sound's like you have a misconception of the meaning of the word "evidence."

On the contrary, you and the op have yet to present one piece of evidence.

The thread title should read:

House releases overview of allegations against Biden​

 

[BPPLEE]

On the contrary, you and the op have yet to present one piece of evidence.

The thread title should read:

House releases overview of allegations against Biden​

I can live with that

 

[Ana the Ist]

On the contrary, you and the op have yet to present one piece of evidence.

The OP has presented tons of evidence.

 

[Ana the Ist]

circumstantial evidence

www.law.cornell.edu

Just a reminder for the kids in the room.

 

[Gene2memE]

Criminal solicitation of violation of oath by public officer.

O.C.G.A. §16-4-7 states: A person commits the offense of criminal solicitation when, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony, he solicits, requests, commands, importunes, or otherwise attempts to cause the other person to engage in such conduct.

 

[Ana the Ist]

Criminal solicitation of violation of oath by public officer.

O.C.G.A. §16-4-7 states: A person commits the offense of criminal solicitation when, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony, he solicits, requests, commands, importunes, or otherwise attempts to cause the other person to engage in such conduct.

Not sure if this is in response to my post...


But you surely understand the difference between "find votes" and "fabricate votes".

 

[Ana the Ist]

As you appear to be the only one talking about "fabricate votes", surely you can enlighten me to the difference?

No problem...

Definition of FABRICATE

invent, create; to make up for the purpose of deception; construct, manufacture; specifically : to construct from diverse and usually standardized parts… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Definition of FIND

to come upon often accidentally : encounter; to meet with (a particular reception); to come upon by searching or effort… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Hope that helps...but if you're still struggling, I'd be more than happy to make it clear.

Given that Georgia's results had already been audited by hand recount and formally certified during November 2020, and then another recount had been conducted in December before the state's electoral votes were awarded to Biden, what would "finding" 17,890 votes entail in early January 2021?

A recount I imagine.

 

[Always in His Presence]

From the link:

8) On December 4, 2015, Biden business associate Eric Schwerin wrote to Kate Bedingfield in the Office of the Vice President providing quotes to use in response to media outreach regarding Hunter Biden’s role in Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company. Later that day, Ms. Bedingfield responded to Mr. Schwerin saying, “VP signed off on this[.]” According to Devon Archer, after a Burisma board of directors meeting in Dubai on the evening of December 4, 2015, Hunter Biden “called D.C.” to discuss pressure that Burisma asked him to relieve.

 

[comana]

From the link:

8) On December 4, 2015, Biden business associate Eric Schwerin wrote to Kate Bedingfield in the Office of the Vice President providing quotes to use in response to media outreach regarding Hunter Biden’s role in Burisma, a Ukrainian energy company. Later that day, Ms. Bedingfield responded to Mr. Schwerin saying, “VP signed off on this[.]” According to Devon Archer, after a Burisma board of directors meeting in Dubai on the evening of December 4, 2015, Hunter Biden “called D.C.” to discuss pressure that Burisma asked him to relieve.

What crime is this evidence of?

 

[rjs330]

Big Guy (whoever he is).

Who do you think he is?

 

[rjs330]

LOL...

We already know they interfered.

Prosecutors under the DOJ gave Hunter's team a heads up on a warrant the team was seeking.

What's really funny is stating the DOJ and Biden Admin stating they didn't interfere and that is supposed to be clarity. Did we somehow expect the to say "yup, we interfered all right and here's what we did."

Since when has anyone since Nixon admitted anything of the sort?

 

[rjs330]

Burisma put him there, did they?

Who helping the funding of the war in Ukraine and who wanted it? Seems like Ukraine is doing well having Biden in office.

 

[Pommer]

Who helping the funding of the war in Ukraine and who wanted it? Seems like Ukraine is doing well having Biden in office.

Putin obviously wanted it.
Do you know why we “back” Ukraine?

 

[The Barbarian]

This is hilarious. Do you actually think that Hunter is meeting with these important people to gain access or money and his dad just happens to call at the right moment to talk about the weather and the city he's in?

Comes down to evidence. As you see, the witnesses point out that they didn't talk business. I have called my son when it happened that he was in or about to be in a meeting with business associates. We didn't talk business. Of course, it's true that I'm his father, so that's understandable.
A prosecutor who takes something like that to court and says "Judge, we don't have any evidence, but do you actually think..." probably won't like the outcome.

 

[The Barbarian]

Putin obviously wanted it.
Do you know why we “back” Ukraine?

He thought he wanted it. I imagine that if he could pick one decision to rethink, it would be this one. Like most things, it's easier to get into a war than to get out of it.

 

[HARK!]

MOD HAT ON


THIS THREAD WAS CLEANED OF OFF TOPIC POSTS ABOUT TRUMP.



THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT TRUMP!



POSTS ABOUT TRUMP ARE OFF TOPIC!



MOD HAT OFF​

 

[rjs330]

On the contrary, you and the op have yet to present one piece of evidence.

The thread title should read:

House releases overview of allegations against Biden​

You have been shown piles of evidence. Do you know what evidence is? This is an inquiry to see what evidence there is and if there is enough to impeach etc. Evidence is there including Hunters own statements regarding giving money to Joe by paying his bills etc.

What kind of evidence do you want?