- Nov 26, 2019
- 15,511
- 8,172
- 50
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Generic Orthodox Christian
- Marital Status
- Celibate
The creeds and councils were directed at major teaching authorities not laypeople.
To put a charitable slant on The Liturgist's latest clariation, JM was on that occasion skirting nominal error.
Also I think we have to remember whom his audience are. It appears the Mexicans have at least simmered down somewhat!
I have to say if he actually denies that the Blessed Virgin Mary is Theotokos, then it is severe error, although it does not rise to the level where I could accuse him of heresy.
However if he went all the way to the end of the Via Nestoria, and declared that the human Jesus and the divine Logos were separate persons in a union of will, that would be heresy.
And that is what this is really about: whereas the title Mother of God has never lead anyone I am aware of to believe that the Blessed Virgin Mary gave birth to the Holy Trinity, and I include in that vast number of people all of those I am aware of who commit heresy by actually worshipping St. Mary in violation of the Second Commandment and the Second Council of Nicaea, belief in Nestorianism has resulted on many occasions in people claiming that the humanity of Jesus is hypostatically or even personally separate from His Divinity, united only through a common will. This outcome is also similar to the heresy of Apollinarianism, which claimed that Jesus Christ had a divine soul and a human body and the heresy of Monothelitism which claimed He had only a divine will, rather than a divine and human will.
So by denying the Theotokos, one can inadvertently imply a separation between the humanity and divinity of Christ, which in turn has been known to lead to people explicitly acknowledging such a separation. That is why the Council of Ephesus declared St. Mary was Theotokos.
You are also mistaken that the Ecumenical Councils were directed at major teaching authorities. What made the councils ecumenical was their acceptance by the entire church including the laity. This is why the Council of Florence is regarded as ecumenical by the Roman Catholic Church, but, despite all but one of the Orthodox bishops present agreeing to it, it is rejected as ecumenical by the Eastern Orthodox, because the laity rejected it once the one dissenting bishop, St. Mark of Ephesus, told them what it entailed (which was submission to the authority of the Pope of Rome in return for military assistance against the Ottoman Empire). The Eastern Orthodox laity chose the horrors of Turkocratia over the greater horror of compromising their faith.
Upvote
0