- Jul 23, 2020
- 2,359
- 238
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Private
Married women have their husbands to help them.Are married woman allowed to do so?
But they also might need child care for some reasons.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Married women have their husbands to help them.Are married woman allowed to do so?
Not at all. Some folks back then didn’t think that blacks were human and worthy of equal protection. Complete ignorance. Same goes today with the unborn.No, idiotic is your word. I said absurd, and it is absurd for some of the reasons pointed out in rebuttal and others which have not been mentioned, whatever they are..
Also, comparing legal person-hood status to a fetus to equal protection to blacks is also absurd. You are conflating racism with giving equal rights to the unborn.
You are comparing apples to oranges. Sad, but not unexpected.Not at all. Some folks back then didn’t think that blacks were human and worthy of equal protection. Complete ignorance. Same goes today with the unborn.
Just because someone is LEGALLY married does not mean that both parties work together or even live together. There are people who are legally married who either A are living a part for whatever reason or may be living together basically as roommates where they have nothing to do with each other's lives, but according to a piece of paper are married.Married women have their husbands to help them.
But they also might need child care for some reasons.
Here is the thing is a person "alive" if they would NOT be viable outside the woman's womb? For example, I have two cousins currently expecting one is due in November the other March of 24. Suppose both women were riding in a car and got into an accident whether they made it or not Mrs. P's baby (the have the same first name) would be worth trying to save because there were be a chance due in November that she could live outside the womb. Mrs. C's baby however would not be worth trying because whether Mrs. C made it or not there is NO WAY that due in March that baby would be able to live outside her womb none and so there would be no point in trying to save the baby irrespective of whether the mom was not badly injured or could be saved if she were badly injuredNot at all. Some folks back then didn’t think that blacks were human and worthy of equal protection. Complete ignorance. Same goes today with the unborn.
How to stop abortions.
1. Stop insulting single pregnant women.
2. Free child care.
Under that logic even neighborhood things would not work as kids are more in danger from people they know than from strangers according to stats.Free child care wouldn't work unless it was a neighbrohood thing. Because if it was any sort of organization then the kids would be being exploited like bring in drag queens and letting them say unhumanly things to the children, If it was a neighbrohood thing then it could be armed daycare by people who care and are not weirdos.
The only way us Christians have to stop abortions is prayer and witnessing to young people.
You keep using that as an excuse to go out of your way to avoid addressing the point.Doubling down on idiotic arguments doesn’t magically make them better.
Free child care wouldn't work unless it was a neighbrohood thing. Because if it was any sort of organization then the kids would be being exploited like bring in drag queens and letting them say unhumanly things to the children, If it was a neighbrohood thing then it could be armed daycare by people who care and are not weirdos.
Interesting. Then I suppose you have no issue with non-Christians having abortions.The only way us Christians have to stop abortions is prayer and witnessing to young people.
Under that logic even neighborhood things would not work as kids are more in danger from people they know than from strangers according to stats.
Amen!Not at all. Some folks back then didn’t think that blacks were human and worthy of equal protection. Complete ignorance. Same goes today with the unborn.
I did not say that childcare should be free really vetting is the only thing you can do and even that comes with limitations as people have been known to leave places when they suspect people are catching on to their behaviors leaving no actual paper trial or convictions to vet. Vetting (background checks) only work if there is a paper trial. As for hanging yes SCOUNTS has found that hanging for most non-homicide crimes aganaist people ( as opposed to the state do not qualify for the death penalty under the 8th amendment.Then no amount of vetting that could be 100% reliable. So iguess then the only response would have to be extreme punishment. Back in western days they might find themselves hanging from a tree? (You don't mess with the Kids!)
Is that too harsh for nowadays? People need to realize their own personal responsibility for themseves and their family, as well as for the community in which they live. Have you ever googled how many countries use armed guards or military to guard the contry's schoolchildren? Most of them do !! But not the United States, oh that sounds scary can't do that here...
What would you suggest for safe daycare?
They read books.
Interesting. Then I suppose you have no issue with non-Christians having abortions.
Interesting. Then I suppose you have no issue with non-Christians having abortions.
The only way us Christians have to stop abortions is prayer and witnessing to young people.
I did not say that childcare should be free really vetting is the only thing you can do and even that comes with limitations as people have been known to leave places when they suspect people are catching on to their behaviors leaving no actual paper trial or convictions to vet. Vetting (background checks) only work if there is a paper trial. As for hanging yes SCOUNTS has found that hanging for most non-homicide crimes aganaist people ( as opposed to the state do not qualify for the death penalty under the 8th amendment.
I made no such assertion. I never said young people were all christian - what you said was: "The only way us Christians have to stop abortions"Now did I say that?! I surely did not, so here we go I guess...
You got that, out of what I said? I said,
Where did I say that the young people were all Christians? Is the "witnessing" that I spoke of intended for those who believe already?! No! It is for the unbeievers. Understand now? You've made a ridiculous assertion.
I made no such assertion. I never said young people were all christian - what you said was: "The only way us Christians have to stop abortions"
Suppose: assume that something is the case on the basis of evidence or probability but without proof or certain knowledge.
Assert: a confident and forceful statement of fact or belief
For saying inappropriate things WAY too far.Hmm, we can't hang them, huh? How about riding them out of town on a rail after we beat them senseless? I mean, we are taking my kids, right? Your kids? I see no reason for a slap n the wrist but rather towards the opposite. (You dont mess with the Kids). People learn faster when they hear about how badly bill gay guy got beaten for saying inappropriate things to a child.
And if they're less than 7 years old, it's a Felony.
The only way us Christians have to stop abortions is prayer
Interesting. Then I suppose you have no issue with non-Christians having abortions.
For saying inappropriate things WAY too far.
Saying things alone is not a crime unless it is threats or fighting words and you cannot make up crimes just because you do not like what people are saying to your kids. Now you can confront the person and in some cases ( depending on the facts you can keep your kids away from certain adults, but in the vast majority of cases words are not crimes and should not be treated as such.That may be. Maybe we should call a neighbrohood meeting and all of us take a look at the facts of the case and vote on it? I don't want to be too harsh. But I want them to learn, you dont mess with the Kids!
Any suggestions?