Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
He is free. He was sent back to Denmark last week and is now with his family in another, undisclosed country. He could still return to the US if he wins this appeal in court.
And I've already given you the facts of Torben's case.
That is not true. If you aren't informed on the subject, please do not spread lies.
Even CBN reported back in June that Torben had already exhausted his appeals.
Well the man and his legal team says he still has an appeal in the works and if it succeeds then he can return to the states, who are any of us to tell them they are wrong? Unless you have insight into their specific legal process that you can speak authoritatively on.
I mean that's kind of comparing apples to oranges. Yes, the laws should be enforced equally without regards to a person's skin color or reason for wanting entry. But Torben entered the country legally through lawful process. The ones crossing the Rio Grande are not. The two situations are not the same nor should they be equated with each other.
Considering that the DOJ website has no current appeals or future hearings listed for Torben, and US immigration law states that if an individual has had a previous asylum application denied they are barred from applying for asylum in the future, and if an individual's deportation was ordered by an immigration judge they are barred from entry to the US for ten years; it's easy to conclude that they are either wrong or putting out misinformation.
Except that there came a point where he overstayed in violation of immigration law, as I understand it. At that point, he should have left (or faced consequences of detention and deportation.) Is that not a violator just as much as a different kind of violator? Isn't being in the country illegally the same in either regard?
Violating the law is violating the law. But again, apples to oranges.
Immigration finds lots of people who overstay, and are dealt with accordingly just like Torben. Are we only concerned with the white evangelists?
Says you, how many is a lot to you out of millions?
Torben's Visa Waiver wasn't cancelled, it expired. Have you ever traveled internationally? I can assure you that Torben understood the terms of the Visa Waiver Program and how he could only stay in the US for 90 days before either having to leave the US or obtain a visa for a longer stay.
