Donald Trump Holds Big Lead Over Joe Biden in Swing States, Polls Show

[HARK!]

Considering you already rejected the scientific poll because you never heard of them, I struggle to find any common denominator on which polls you accept, apart from the polls delivering the replies you are hoping for.

Care to show me the science that you claim that I reject?

 

[HARK!]

Well, the pollster in your OP gets an A/B ranking so I'm afraid you can't trust it. Nor the Harvard/Harris polls that get a B.

Again from a biased source? Really?

 

[essentialsaltes]

Again from a biased source? Really?

Nithavela has already pointed out how you probably gauge the trustworthiness of polls. But if you reject YouGov because 538 gave it a good grade, shouldn't you also reject your polls if they also get good grades from such a biased source?

 

[HARK!]

Nithavela has already pointed out how you probably gauge the trustworthiness of polls. But if you reject YouGov because 538 gave it a good grade, shouldn't you also reject your polls if they also get good grades from such a biased source?

Flawed logic.

If I were to tell you that rotten food was every bit as good as fresh food; would you reject fresh food?

 

[essentialsaltes]

Flawed logic.

If I were to tell you that rotten food was every bit as good as fresh food; would you reject fresh food?

How did you know the YouGov poll was rotten?

 

[HARK!]

How did you know the YouGov poll was rotten?

When did I say that it was? As I recall, I pointed out that it is a politically biased source.

 

[essentialsaltes]

When did I say that it was? As I recall, I pointed out that it is a politically biased source.

You accused ABC News of bias.
YouGov is not ABC News. ABC News owns 538, which gave YouGov a B+ rating as a pollster.

 

[Fantine]

The informal poll at the start of your thread indicates 89% of readers intend to vote for Biden and 11% for Trump.

It makes me happy that participants here are able to sort through all the information presented and come to the correct conclusion based on facts.

Now how do we duplicate this for the general public?

 

[HARK!]

You accused ABC News of bias.
YouGov is not ABC News. ABC News owns 538

I find this defense to be comical.

 

[essentialsaltes]

I find this defense to be comical.

How did you know the YouGov poll was rotten?

 

[Nithavela]

Care to show me the science that you claim that I reject?

You are playing word games. I said that you rejected polls, not that you rejected science.

 

[HARK!]

The informal poll at the start of your thread indicates 89% of readers intend to vote for Biden and 11% for Trump.

It makes me happy that participants here are able to sort through all the information presented and come to the correct conclusion based on facts.

Now how do we duplicate this for the general public?

What this shows us (and I did this intentionally) is that the political views of the members of this sub-forum are disproportionate with Americans in general.

I thank all who participated in this test, which demonstrates the evidence to support my hypothesis.

I was hoping to get more votes before I let the cat out of the bag; but I would call this test a success.

 

[HARK!]

You are playing word games. I said that you rejected polls, not that you rejected science.

Your words:

Considering you already rejected the scientific poll

You have yet to establish the science. Without that science, your poll is no more valid, regarding a true cross section of American voters, than the one that I created.

 

[essentialsaltes]

You have yet to establish the science.

What do you mean exactly? Like this?

 

[Fantine]

What this shows us (and I did this intentionally) is that the political views of the members of this sub-forum are disproportionate with Americans in general.

I thank all who participated in this test, which demonstrates the evidence to support my hypothesis.

I was hoping to get more votes before I let the cat out of the bag; but I would call this test a success.

View attachment 333779

Disproportionate? Perhaps, but I wouldn't base that on one poll 17 months before the 2024 election.

I have seen signs at parking lot exits of churches saying "You are now entering the mission field."

Trump is "unique threat" to the church: Christian leader

Evangelical Christian theologian Russell Moore has been a frequent Trump critic.

www.newsweek.com

Newsweek published a recent article showing that many Evangelical leaders are turning against Trump.

The Christians in this thread wholeheartedly agree, and I urge them to work in the "mission field" in their home states to prevent a twice-indicted (and soon to be quadruply-indicted), twice impeached former president from being the Republcian Party's standard bearer.

 

[HARK!]

What do you mean exactly? Like this?

View attachment 333780

From where? Blue states? That information alone doesn't tell me that this is an accurate reflection of a cross sample of American voters.

 

[HARK!]

Disproportionate?

Yes. Disproportionate.

Perhaps,

Perhaps? LOL!

 

[essentialsaltes]

From where? Blue states? That information alone doesn't tell me that this is an accurate reflection of a cross sample of American voters.

 

[HARK!]

View attachment 333781

Looks disproportionate already.

Which counties?

Gotta link?

 

[Belk]

What this shows us (and I did this intentionally) is that the political views of the members of this sub-forum are disproportionate with Americans in general.

I thank all who participated in this test, which demonstrates the evidence to support my hypothesis.

I was hoping to get more votes before I let the cat out of the bag; but I would call this test a success.

View attachment 333779

How did you limit the responses to American members?