Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's not really what guidance counselers (of any kind) do. They give you tests that show that you'd be happy as a bricklayer or accountant, and help you get into college.
Incorrect. As I said, minsterial exception is not a law. This legal doctrine is derived from the U.S. Constitution. As to "minister," I think your confusion comes from relating this to a religious minister. It has a different legal meaning.
You're mistaken. This is the first job description that popped up in a quick web search:
An alternative view is that the the idea of religious rights is being expanded to run roughshod over other peoples' rights. What was once the idea that people could believe and worship as they choose is turning into the idea that believing really really hard is an excuse to ignore any other law.
But if they have to be explicit which minorities they're going to stick it to beforehand, what happens when the far right picks another minority to try and demonize next week? Then they won't be able to get on board to score cheap political points with low information voters. And no one wants to be left behind like that, totally unfair.
Fornication is dangerous; but that's not the issue here. This homosexual was married,
And yet they hired this employee. If the company doesn't even know what their rules are, why are employees held to a higher standard?
Anything in there about eschewing homosexuality? I certainly don't see it.
It's something the courts derived from the Constitution. And my point is that freedom to practice your religion is central. We already have an office of the FBI zeroing in on Catholics as domestic terrorists. The state should stay out of Catholic religion. If someone signs a contract agreeing to abide by some basic Catholic standards at a Catholic school the state should not be able to come in and void the contract because it fits with their woke agenda or any other agenda.
No we don't. Did you listen to Wray's testimony?
That depends on the hiring contract. It also depends on if it is a "right to work" state. I don't think there is a one size fits all answer here. I do note, though, which side is concocting negative ideas the "other side" is supposedly engaged in. I don't suppose it ever occurred that a gay Catholic might simply see the church's stance as incorrect?
Your questions weren't relevant to you inquisition about my use of the pronoun "we". Also I thought they were rather ugly and I don't want to dwell in your conceptual pit.
