What a relief

[AV1611VET]

The only climate cult is the climate denier cult known for its excessive admiration of fossil fuel industry.

Tucker is banking millions to feed the vulnerable and less educated right wingers hatred of anything they can stick on the left. I am sure Tucker is laughing all the way to the bank. It really is unfortunate for deniers like you.

Aren't we supposed to be busy saving whales or something?

 

[Postvieww]

Tucker is banking millions to feed the vulnerable and less educated right wingers hatred of anything they can stick on the left. I am sure Tucker is laughing all the way to the bank. It really is unfortunate for deniers like you.

Expected response, attack the messenger while ignoring the message. Do you really not see the millions made off of this cult of climate by many of the prophets of doom?

Actually Tucker is one of the few reporting truth that is why he got fired. Don't doubt it.

 

[Frank Robert]

If someone you know is a member of the Climate Change Movement, and you are interested in intervention strategies, please visit Intervention."

Look in the mirror.

For those who may not know what an intervention is, it is a term used in an addictions for a process where family and friends of a person addicted to alcohol or a substance confront, in a loving way, the addicted person's denial similar to what many of usare doing here with Postviwv.

 

[Frank Robert]

Expected response, attack the messenger while ignoring the message. Do you really not see the millions made off of this cult of climate by many of the prophets of doom?

Have you read the recent news about Fox news and Tucker or heard about the Dominion case result in in 700+ million dollar judgement against fox for their intentional lying about the 2020 election? When you want to believe convicted liars over the the 97% of climate scientiests you do so at your own peril. Unfortunately for all of us, the blattan lies of the fossil fuel industry and their surrogates are responsible and will continue to be responsible to unimaginable damage to our planet.

 

[Frank Robert]

Aren't we supposed to be busy saving whales or something?

We are suppose to be responsible citizens which is difficult for the majority of us, myself included.

 

[Postvieww]

Preview YouTube video Biden calls climate change 'clear and present danger'Biden calls climate change 'clear and present danger'

Joshua in scripture stopped the sun in the sky, this false climate prophet will stop nothing but the economy

 

[Postvieww]

Have you read the recent news about Fox news and Tucker or heard about the Dominion case result in in 700+ million dollar judgement against fox for their intentional lying about the 2020 election? When you want to believe convicted liars over the the 97% of climate scientiests you do so at your own peril. Unfortunately for all of us, the blattan lies of the fossil fuel industry and their surrogates are responsible and will continue to be responsible to unimaginable damage to our planet.

Tucker is not a convicted liar. Do some research in the Blackrock connection to Fox News and the political leanings of Murdock and you will find the real reason Tucker was fired. Bongino has also recently departed Fox. These two are not liars they are reporting truth the establishment does not want out. I need no-one to feel sorry for me, I have my eyes wide open and see the true motive behind this cult of climate. Yes if you want to call me a cult denier I will wear it proudly.

 

[Postvieww]

When you want to believe convicted liars over the the 97% of climate scientiests

What is the source for this 97%? Who decides what scientists are true scientist and which are more concerned about their grants and positions than truth?

 

[Frank Robert]

Tucker is not a convicted liar

Thanks for the correction. Fox and Tucker lies have been exposed through the process of discovery which resulted in a 700+ million dollar settlement. The discovery process of their emails turned up multiple lies that they were feeding their viewers. The is still more to come with other lawsuits.

Do some research in the Blackrock connection to Fox News and the political leanings of Murdock and you will find the real reason

I read the emails which enough to what their lies were about. Whatever politcal reasons there may be they do not justify the lies they feed their gullible viewers.

Tucker was fired. Bongino has also recently departed Fox. These two are not liars they are reporting truth the establishment does not want out. I need no-one to feel sorry for me,

Yes, they were reporting the truth that the 2020 election was stolen. /s

I have my eyes wide open and see the true motive behind this cult of climate. Yes if you want to call me a cult denier I will wear it proudly.

It's sad that our intervention is failing. On the positive side you do provide much entertainment.

 

[AV1611VET]

We are suppose to be responsible citizens which is difficult for the majority of us, myself included.

According to tree huggers, where should our responsibility start?

Pollution? energy consumption? environment? ethics? economics? crime?

 

[Frank Robert]

What is the source for this 97%?

It appears you have a very short memory. You asked that before and I provided the source.

Here it is again.
According to Wikipedia, depending on expertise, between 91% (all scientists) to 100% (climate scientists with high levels of expertise, 20+ papers published) agreed human activity is causing climate change. Among the total group of climate scientists, 98.7% agreed.

Who decides what scientists are true scientist and which are more concerned about their grants and positions than truth?

It's true scientists, like other professionals are paid for work they preform.

There are different levels of scientists based on their experience and expertise. According to indeed.com, there are five different types of research scientists to consider on your journey of becoming a research scientist:​

1. Level one research scientist
2. Level two research scientist
3. Senior research scientist
4. Principal research scientist
5. Senior principal research scientist

From your comments it appears that you are more comfortable with fossil fuel industry disinformation and political scammers than legitimate science.

 

[sjastro]

What is the source for this 97%? Who decides what scientists are true scientist and which are more concerned about their grants and positions than truth?

Your ignorance is showing again.
Don't you realize true scientists come with a certificate of authenticity with a money back guarantee if they are not.

Here is mine.

 

[Frank Robert]

According to tree huggers, where should our responsibility start?

Pollution? energy consumption? environment? ethics? economics? crime?

I don't who or what you are referring to as "tree huggers," but from my perspective, a person should follow their interests and conscience. As a guide, I like the Tao Te Ching - Chapter 19 (I do not claim that I always succeed.)

Behave simply​

Lessen selfishness and​

Restrain desires.​

 

[AV1611VET]

I don't who or what you are referring to as "tree huggers," but from my perspective, a person should follow their interests and conscience. As a guide, I like the Tao Te Ching - Chapter 19 (I do not claim that I always succeed.)

Behave simply​

Lessen selfishness and​

Restrain desires.​

So when someone says SAVE THE WHALES, is a good comeback: GO AHEAD?

 

[Postvieww]

Your ignorance is showing again.
Don't you realize true scientists come with a certificate of authenticity with a money back guarantee if they are not.

Here is mine.

View attachment 330566​

Well now I guess now you are an official prophet of doom. Thanks for showing you "official" credentials.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Well now I guess now you are an official prophet of doom. Thanks for showing you "official" credentials.

Mine are in a mailing tube, but I'm not going to show them to you.

 

[Postvieww]

It appears you have a very short memory. You asked that before and I provided the source.

Fact Checking The Claim Of 97% Consensus On Anthropogenic Climate Change

Belief in the scientific community in human-caused climate change is clearly below 97%, a close review of the evidence shows, but the claim continues to be widely publicized and defended. Would a lower level of consensus convince anyone concerned about global warming to change their views?

www.forbes.com

False! 97% is false and if you take out the money scared hacks it is even lower.

 

[Postvieww]

Mine are in a mailing tube, but I'm not going to show them to you.

I wouldn't believe them if you did.

 

[Hans Blaster]

I wouldn't believe them if you did.

You wouldn't believe an official diploma?

"The University of Somewhere

awards the degree of

Doctor of Philosophy

in

Physics

to

Hans Q. Blaster

on this date xx/xx/xxxx"

You are a cynic and untrusting person aren't you. Deciding to reject actual evidence before you even see it. Not exactly open to honest discourse are you?

 

[Postvieww]

You wouldn't believe an official diploma?

"The University of Somewhere

awards the degree of

Doctor of Philosophy

in

Physics

to

Hans Q. Blaster

on this date xx/xx/xxxx"

You are a cynic and untrusting person aren't you. Deciding to reject actual evidence before you even see it. Not exactly open to honest discourse are you?

It's not actual evidence until you show it. You do know documents can be faked. I plead guilty to being a cynic and untrusting of the cult of climate change.