- Oct 2, 2020
- 27,303
- 14,932
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
That's not esoteric. And examples of it can be found in scripture. The term "gnomic will" however probably isn't known to most. But this started out with me thinking he used the "God doesn't force people to come to salvation through Christ" argument. But I've never seen someone who believes in universal reconciliation, ever say or imply that force would be involved. So it's a strawman argument as far as I can see. If unbelievers, the wicked et al are to be saved after death, it's going to be in the same way as everyone else who's been saved, not through force, according to Christian universalism. I'm never going to say Christian universalism is definitely correct. But I don't think people should make inaccurate claims about it. I will point out holes in arguments against it when I see them. Which is more often than not.Be that as it may, it's a distinction implicit in a number of early church writings. Our willingness to choose evil is not true freedom but a sign of our spiritual immaturity (Irenaeus) or a spiritual malady in need of healing (Origen/Nyssa).
Why did Jesus always choose the good commensurate with the divine will? Maximus is going to say because he was Logos. And as Jesus said he only does what he sees the Father doing, which is a way of saying he was the Logos of God. The Word or Reason of God can only choose good. That is true freedom. And that is the divine intention for human freedom- to be free in Christ is to be free indeed. All that to say, our experience of the freedom to choose evil is not true freedom.
Upvote
0