• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

"Nomads of Yahweh" hieroglyphic in Sudan

Pavel Mosko

Arch-Dude of the Apostolic
Site Supporter
Oct 4, 2016
7,236
7,320
58
Boyertown, PA.
✟816,515.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I was listening to a video talking about archeological evidence for the faith and cited a video covering this discovery from a few years back. Atheists and skeptics of the Bible have used the lack of obvious evidence for the existence of the Hebrews in early Egypt as a kind of proof that the Biblical passages are more legendary than historical. In Egypt, there was a Semitic people called the Hyksos but that is a very broad term that covered all the Semitic peoples living in Egypt like the Babylonians besides the Hebrews. Anyway, people forget that at different times other areas like Sudan were part of the Egyptian empire and can be used to substantiate such claims. Besides that, I would point out that the lack of evidence is not necessarily proof that something doesn't exist, not only is proof hard to find, and things get destroyed but the Pharaohs often wanted to erase some unhappy memories from the record of the past.


 

Yeshua HaDerekh

Men dream of truth, find it then cant live with it
May 9, 2013
13,248
4,685
Eretz
✟381,685.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
I was listening to a video talking about archeological evidence for the faith and cited a video covering this discovery from a few years back. Atheists and skeptics of the Bible have used the lack of obvious evidence for the existence of the Hebrews in early Egypt as a kind of proof that the Biblical passages are more legendary than historical. In Egypt, there was a Semitic people called the Hyksos but that is a very broad term that covered all the Semitic peoples living in Egypt like the Babylonians besides the Hebrews. Anyway, people forget that at different times other areas like Sudan were part of the Egyptian empire and can be used to substantiate such claims. Besides that, I would point out that the lack of evidence is not necessarily proof that something doesn't exist, not only is proof hard to find, and things get destroyed but the Pharaohs often wanted to erase some unhappy memories from the record of the past.


yahweh? Except that is not what it says...it says "ta shasu yehua"
 
Upvote 0

Helmut-WK

Member
Nov 26, 2007
2,050
420
Berlin
✟92,781.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
yahweh? Except that is not what it says...it says "ta shasu yehua"
The consonants are YHWH, and as to the vowels, we don't know the exact values in YHWH (Yahweh is an educated guess), and we do not know how the vowels were transliterated into the Egyptian language. According to the web-page, there is no doubt that this is the name of the God of Israel.
 
Upvote 0

dqhall

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 21, 2015
7,547
4,172
Florida
Visit site
✟811,723.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I was listening to a video talking about archeological evidence for the faith and cited a video covering this discovery from a few years back. Atheists and skeptics of the Bible have used the lack of obvious evidence for the existence of the Hebrews in early Egypt as a kind of proof that the Biblical passages are more legendary than historical. In Egypt, there was a Semitic people called the Hyksos but that is a very broad term that covered all the Semitic peoples living in Egypt like the Babylonians besides the Hebrews. Anyway, people forget that at different times other areas like Sudan were part of the Egyptian empire and can be used to substantiate such claims. Besides that, I would point out that the lack of evidence is not necessarily proof that something doesn't exist, not only is proof hard to find, and things get destroyed but the Pharaohs often wanted to erase some unhappy memories from the record of the past.


Even if the Bible contains a thousand errors, Jesus testified God is true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pavel Mosko
Upvote 0

Yeshua HaDerekh

Men dream of truth, find it then cant live with it
May 9, 2013
13,248
4,685
Eretz
✟381,685.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
The consonants are YHWH, and as to the vowels, we don't know the exact values in YHWH (Yahweh is an educated guess), and we do not know how the vowels were transliterated into the Egyptian language. According to the web-page, there is no doubt that this is the name of the God of Israel.
Well no, I quoted the webpage...
 
Upvote 0

Helmut-WK

Member
Nov 26, 2007
2,050
420
Berlin
✟92,781.00
Country
Germany
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I did not object to your quote, but to your conclusion that "yehua" is not YHWH.

The page says: »but even if Yahweh is a place in these hieroglyphic texts, it was clearly a place named after the god Yahweh of the Old Testament.«

"Yehua" being a place name is a proposition the author doesn't share, but handles as a counter-argument that cannot be refuted with certainty. So he counters with: Anyway, it is a reference to the God of the OT.
 
Upvote 0