Alternative Explanations for 'The Mandela Effect'

[JohnEmmett]

First rule of holes...

I think we are both convinced of our perspective


Although you are convinced before investigation


And I am convinced after investigation

 

[Bungle_Bear]

No…

No surprise there. Hubris doesn't really lend itself to self-examination.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

I don't get this. You used to tell us that the Mandela effect could be explained through faulty memories, now you've changed your position completely.

You've changed timeline......

 

[JohnEmmett]

You used to tell us that the Mandela effect could be explained through faulty memories, now you've changed your position completely.

No…

The Effect

 

[Bungle_Bear]

No…

The Effect

How do you know this isn't a perfect example of The Effect?

 

[JohnEmmett]

How do you know this isn't a perfect example of The Effect?

Aug 28, 2020:

It's not false memories.

That's why this is interesting…

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Aug 28, 2020:

And? My post #509 says it is an example, yet you seem certain it is not.

 

[JohnEmmett]

And? My post #509 says it is an example, yet you seem certain it is not.

Sorry…

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Sorry…

No explanation?

 

[JohnEmmett]

No explanation?

It's not false memories.

 

[Kylie]

No…

The Effect

Yes.

I clearly remember that in the past you spoke often about how the Mandela effect was nothing more than the result of flawed memories.

How can you say that I am wrong? If you are now saying that the Mandela effect is really the result of jumping into a different timeline, then how can you say that I am wrong? Perhaps I originated in a timeline where you DID say that the Mandela effect was flawed memories, but then I jumped into this timeline where you say the complete opposite!

 

[JohnEmmett]

I clearly remember that in the past you spoke often about how the Mandela effect was nothing more than the result of flawed memories.

Quote me then

You won’t be able to …

 

[Bungle_Bear]

It's not false memories.

If it's not false memory then it's a real example. But you deny it's a real example, so it must be false memory. But memories cannot be false, so it must be real. But it's not real, so........

 

[JohnEmmett]

If it's not false memory then it's a real example.

No…

 

[Kylie]

Quote me then

You won’t be able to …

How do you expect me to quote a posts that only exists in a different universe?

I started in Universe A, where you said that the Mandela effect was due to flawed memories.

I then transferred here, to universe B, where you say that the Mandela effect is a result of transferring between universes.

You then ask me to quote a post that only exists in Universe A. How exactly do you expect me to do that? Have you developed a way for me to transfer between universes at will?

 

[JohnEmmett]

How do you expect me to quote a post that only exists in a different universe?

In theory… you could be right

 

[Kylie]

No…

Then what is it?

I remember things one way, but when I check reality, I find that things are not the way I remember. That is exactly what the Mandela effect is. And yet you insist that the Mandela effect is not the explanation here. So tell me, what is the explanation?

 

[JohnEmmett]

what is the explanation?

I do not think it's false memory

 

[Kylie]

I do not think it's false memory

I did ask you what it wasn't, I asked you what is WAS.

I look back through all the posts I have made to you and see that in this universe we have often disagreed. However, I remember us agreeing - specifically, that the Mandela Effect was due to flawed memories.

Since my memories do not match what the evidence indicates, do you believe that I have come from a different universe? Yes or no.

 

[JohnEmmett]

do you believe that I have come from a different universe? Yes or no.

your memories may not match this timeline

in that case…

the best explanation is that you are not from this timeline