- Dec 31, 2016
- 7,221
- 3,311
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
Because that's backbone, as they 'used to say.'Why not?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Because that's backbone, as they 'used to say.'Why not?
I would love to have a conversation about the dossier simply because the gist of the dossier was Putin, Russia, were trying their all to help Trump win. That is true. And not only is that true, Trump et al willingly used what Russia offered to bolster their campaign.CNN & MS-NBC have been deceving their viewers for years.
For example, they already knew the Russia collusion report (Dossier) was false as early as 2017.
Even famous Watergate journalist Bob Woodward told CNN it was garbage; and he hates Trump.
MS-NBC's Chris Matthews also reported that Hillary Clinton PAID for the Russia collusion Dossier:
The media knew all this, but kept on defaming Trump as a Russian spy. Biggest hoax in journalism history.
Maybe he should take it easy on them; they may be supporting him before long.Those things are already happening and did not prevent the lawsuit.
Who knows, their Big Lie may become the Big Truth.I suspect they'll be "both-sides"ing insurrection and the Big Lie soon.
They're well known, but not in this way.(CNN is notorious for thinking that all sides of an argument are worth of attention.)
Haven't they probed that to death already???And the other part of the question - how does that compare with the amount of business the Trump clan has done and has sought to do with them?
I think they've already said 'that ain't so.'I would love to have a conversation about the dossier simply because the gist of the dossier was Putin, Russia, were trying their all to help Trump win. That is true. And not only is that true, Trump et al willingly used what Russia offered to bolster their campaign.
The dossier said Russia was steadfast trying to help Trump win. That is true. That is what the FBI point blank said. So to just dismiss it as wrong is a misnomer.I think they've already said 'that ain't so.'
True, we should all take that to the bank.The dossier said Russia was steadfast trying to help Trump win. That is true. That is what the FBI point blank said. So to just dismiss it as wrong is a misnomer.
This is what is said nowadays... since everyone has become so civilized.No, it's petulant abusive bullying.
Either you can believe that, or you can believe Putin's "very strong denial" over our own intel. I mean even given the war Russians are waking up to Putin.True, we should all take that to the bank.
Is that the only choice?Either you can believe that, or you can believe Putin's "very strong denial" over our own intel. I mean even given the war Russians are waking up to Putin.
There is only one question, and one reality. I find it baffling that this is in question given what the dossier said about Russia, along with Russia's long history of interfering into the elections of the US, Germany, France, Ukraine....I mean I could go on.Is that the only choice?
Who knows, their Big Lie may become the Big Truth.
It's because your question seems to suggest collusion by Trump, which has already been shot down in flames.There is only one question, and one reality. I find it baffling that this is in question given what the dossier said about Russia, along with Russia's long history of interfering into the elections of the US, Germany, France, Ukraine....I mean I could go on.
No, that is not my question. I said point blank what I think happened as noted by the DOJ. Please don't argue against something I never said or thought. Collusion isn't even a word the FBI used, it's a talking head talking point.It's because your question seems to suggest collusion by Trump, which has already been shot down in flames.
And that from someone who believes everything Dems say about it.Trump knows that if he repeats a lie enough times, people will start to believe it. Sadly, that's proven to be true - over and over.
He lied on election night.
He has lied ever since.
And that from someone who believes everything Dems say about it.
Do you honestly believe that's not what they were looking for?No, that is not my question. I said point blank what I think happened as noted by the DOJ. Please don't argue against something I never said or thought. Collusion isn't even a word the FBI used, it's a talking head talking point.
It's sort of an 'if the shoe fits' comment.Are you referring to me?
Who knows, their Big Lie may become the Big Truth.It's sort of an 'if the shoe fits' comment.