Angel are real

[Rajni]

I found that strangely very therapeutic.

Yes! Very peaceful. They're kind of creepy and beautiful all at the same time. And calming.
It's probably a good thing they don't need to wear contact lenses, because that would get expensive.

 

[Walk together]

Yes! Very peaceful. They're kind of creepy and beautiful all at the same time. And calming.
It's probably a good thing they don't need to wear contact lenses, because that would get expensive.

At least we can be sure that they are keeping an eye on us. Maybe they are watchful Angels.

 

[Leaviathan]

Here is a video that shows what angels might look like according to the descriptions of them in scripture.

Brings new meaning to "an eye for an eye"

 

[Skye1300]

Here is a video that shows what angels might look like according to the descriptions of them in scripture.

Wow interesting. Kinda scary but not scary at the same time. If I saw that in real life I would be scared though.

 

[Robban]

Angels are real,
not so sure about the chubby chics with wings though,

like on greetings cards.

 

[Robban]

 

[Robban]

One for the road.

.

Just to keep it light, haha.

 

[Valletta]

Re. angels: If you’re open minded, and not easily offended, you might consider reading an early 20th century French novel, La Revolte des Anges (The Revolt of the Angels.) Written by Anatole France, a journalist, author, and critic. It’s about the guardian angel of a wealthy young man, who comes down to Earth to study in the man’s extensive library. He reads books on history, philosophy, science, theology, geography, and many other topics. He comes to suspect that everything he thought he knew about God, is upside down. God is not the righteous, holy deity as portrayed in the Bible. He’a actually a power-mad demiurge (a minor god) who craves worship and adoration. Satan, OTOH, who was the greatest and brightest angel is the true lover and benefactor of mankind. Who led the unsuccessful rebellion against the dictator God, and whose name and reputation have been falsely smeared for all eternity. I won’t get into the rest of the plot. The link has more info:

The Revolt of the Angels by Anatole France

Of course, the book was immediately banned as heretical and blasphemous by the RCC when it was published. But that didn’t prevent Anatole France from winning the Nobel Prize for literature. Being banned might actually have helped it win.

An angel appeared to the children at Fatima. Later came the miracle of the sun, the events were documented by so many anti-Catholics and atheists. If you're open-minded you might take a look at the evidence.

 

[jayem]

An angel appeared to the children at Fatima. Later came the miracle of the sun, the events were documented by so many anti-Catholics and atheists. If you're open-minded you might take a look at the evidence.

Wow, that’s an oldie. I haven’t heard anything about Fatima in decades. As I recall, not everyone in the crowd saw the sun dancing in the sky. And anyway, we only have one sun. If it was doing acrobatics, why wouldn’t that have been noticed, and reported, everywhere in the world?

You’re entitled to believe anything you like. But the Fatima event is clearly an example of mass delusional disorder. Nothing supernatural about it in the least.

 

[Valletta]

Wow, that’s an oldie. I haven’t heard anything about Fatima in decades. As I recall, not everyone in the crowd saw the sun dancing in the sky. And anyway, we only have one sun. If it was doing acrobatics, why wouldn’t that have been noticed, and reported, everywhere in the world?

You’re entitled to believe anything you like. But the Fatima event is clearly an example of mass delusional disorder. Nothing supernatural about it in the least.

Indeed, if the sun danced why would people who were only eleven miles or closer see it? Science cannot explain it. Yet 70,000 people is a lot to be deluded, all of those atheists, journalist skeptics, you would think at least one would not be subject to mass delusional order, one individual did try and explain it away--odds are you would have seen it as well. Even more interesting is everyone was soaked and then immediately dry after the vision. Do you think all 70,000 hallucinated the dryness for hours until they really were dry? Is There Strong Evidence for The Miracle of the Sun? Personally I believe the children saw an angel and that the people saw a miracle.

 

[Walk together]

There is absolutely no evidence to support the existence of angels.

There will be if you see one most of the time they are with you and you don't know keeping you safe.

 

[Walk together]

Wow, that’s an oldie. I haven’t heard anything about Fatima in decades. As I recall, not everyone in the crowd saw the sun dancing in the sky. And anyway, we only have one sun. If it was doing acrobatics, why wouldn’t that have been noticed, and reported, everywhere in the world?

You’re entitled to believe anything you like. But the Fatima event is clearly an example of mass delusional disorder. Nothing supernatural about it in the least.

The sun may have been eclipsed by an Angil just lined up with that specific area.

 

[Walk together]

Indeed, if the sun danced why would people who were only eleven miles or closer see it? Science cannot explain it. Yet 70,000 people is a lot to be deluded, all of those atheists, journalist skeptics, you would think at least one would not be subject to mass delusional order, one individual did try and explain it away--odds are you would have seen it as well. Even more interesting is everyone was soaked and then immediately dry after the vision. Do you think all 70,000 hallucinated the dryness for hours until they really were dry? Is There Strong Evidence for The Miracle of the Sun? Personally I believe the children saw an angel and that the people saw a miracle.

Yes, the Angel was dancing in front of the Sun just for them, not the whole world.

 

[Valletta]

Easily explained. A crowd of people whipped up into a religious frenzy staring at the sun for too long lol.
Have you ever heard of refraction?

I see, so you as an atheist would also have been whipped up into a religious frenzy like the atheists and other skeptics who were there? And it just so happened that there was something strange going on with the sun that 70,000 people were mesmerized? How about their clothes being completely dry after the deluge of rain?

 

[jayem]

I found a couple of articles by Ben Radford. Who's a skeptic. Both the solar and rainfall claims are addressed. Anyone interested can read them and draw his own conclusions.

Anyway, it seems to me that discussing Fatima should be done in a separate thread.

The Lady of Fátima & the Miracle of the Sun

Fatima Miracle Claims All Wet | Skeptical Inquirer

 

[Walk together]

I found a couple of articles by Ben Radford. Who's a skeptic. Both the solar and rainfall claims are addressed. Anyone interested can read them and draw his own conclusions.

Anyway, it seems to me that discussing Fatima should be done in a separate thread.

The Lady of Fátima & the Miracle of the Sun

Fatima Miracle Claims All Wet | Skeptical Inquirer

That's OK you can debate if Angel are real or not. There is always the opposite side to all topics.

 

[Valletta]

I found a couple of articles by Ben Radford. Who's a skeptic. Both the solar and rainfall claims are addressed. Anyone interested can read them and draw his own conclusions.

Anyway, it seems to me that discussing Fatima should be done in a separate thread.

The Lady of Fátima & the Miracle of the Sun

Fatima Miracle Claims All Wet | Skeptical Inquirer

An angel appeared to the Fatima children.

 

[Walk together]

Yesterday I saw a fairy in my garden pulling up daisies, prove me wrong

I will have what your drinking, got ya.

 

[Valletta]

Saying things doesn't make them true.
I'll give you an example.... Yesterday I saw a fairy in my garden pulling up daisies, prove me wrong

I was making the point about Fatima, at Fatima we have documented supernatural events observed by a variety of witnesses.

 

[Walk together]

Milk and sugar?

You are not antisocial.