Who is Mr Darwin?

[Mr Laurier]

I hear that all the time, but no one gives me his name.

Level with me.

Was it Charles Darwin? Carlos Linnaeus? who?

None of the above.
The last common ancestor between humans and chimpanzees, died out long before the idea of personal names was developed.
The ancestor was not even an individual, but a population. A population that lived some eight million years ago, in Africa

 

[Mr Laurier]

In the meantime, any child can -- (or should be able to) -- give you the name of our "common ancestor."

No. They cannot.
Do you know why they cannot?

 

[Mr Laurier]

Education breeds intolerance, doesn't it?

Not at all.
Indeed quite the opposite

 

[SkyWriting]

Ok. What fantasy would that be?

That God was not involved in the design of all animals.

 

[SkyWriting]

No. They cannot.
Do you know why they cannot?

Too hard to pronounce.

 

[SkyWriting]

Not at all.
Indeed quite the opposite

"I see what you mean." is the correct answer for your claim.
Assuming you are not claiming ignorance anyway. I could be rong.

 

[AV1611VET]

No. They cannot.
Do you know why they cannot?

Yes -- because there's no such animal.

 

[Mr Laurier]

That God was not involved in the design of all animals.

Hardly a fantasy.

 

[Mr Laurier]

Yes -- because there's no such animal.

Actually, we have the fossil remains of just such an animal.

 

[AV1611VET]

Actually, we have the fossil remains of just such an animal.

So you have the fossil remains, but no name assigned to it?

Sounds like they learned their lesson from Nebraska Man (Hesperopithecus haroldcookii).

 

[Bungle_Bear]

So you have the fossil remains, but no name assigned to it?

Sounds like they learned their lesson from Nebraska Man (Hesperopithecus haroldcookii).

It's funny how a beluever of a minority view of Christianity uses a mistake made by a very small minority of palaeontologists as evidence that the whole of science is wrong. Would it be acceptable to conclude that, based on your minority views, not only is Christianity wrong but every religion must be wrong?

 

[AV1611VET]

It's funny how a beluever of a minority view of Christianity uses a mistake made by a very small minority of palaeontologists as evidence that the whole of science is wrong.

And who would that be?

 

[SkyWriting]

Hardly a fantasy.

It's likely Darwin had God in mind the whole time, given his training in ministry.
But he figured the book would sell better if he didn't mention God.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

And who would that be?

Genghis Khan

 

[Astrid]

Genghis Khan

Someone picking on my fav grandcestor again?

 

[AV1611VET]

Someone picking on my fav grandcestor again?

And he's got the wrong person, even.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

And he's got the wrong person, even.

Sorry. Which alter ego are you manifesting at the moment?

 

[Astrid]

Sorry. Which alter ego are you manifesting at the moment?

Well, i do have genetics for my persona/ avatar
which I trust you do not-?
In the event his descendants are common as dirt.
Im sure not presenting as the rarity
our Filipino friends would call a plying fig.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Well, i do have genetics for my persona/ avatar
which I trust you do not-?
In the event his descendants are common as dirt.
Im sure not presenting as the rarity
our Filipino friends would call a plying fig.

Are you not aware that AV likea to claim he is Genghis Khan?

 

[AV1611VET]

Are you not aware that AV likea to claim he is Genghis Khan?

Again, you've got the wrong person.

AV, Genghis Khan ... neither claim all of science is wrong.

Both claim scientists are gifted to us from God.

So ya ... you got the wrong person.