Rejection of evolution correlates with racism

[Bungle_Bear]

Like here?

Romans 5:6 For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.
7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die.

Like here?

Romans 5:6 For when we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly.
7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die.

That doesn't even glance sideways at the question being asked, let alone address it directly.

 

[AV1611VET]

Then if God mandated that aeroplane must collide with this building that would be fine?

That's a loaded question.

It either is or it isn’t fine.

Do I get to fly around the building once per day for six days, then seven times the seventh?

 

[2PhiloVoid]

Can you blame them? As a Christian, I would like nothing better than to see the end of the Bible God.

You may have to explain what you're intending to mean specifically when you use the term "Bible God."

I'm guessing you mean to refer to something along the lines of 'hyper-fundamentalist balderdash' rather than merely to some kind of subtle reference to the questionable parsing of someone like Marcion.

 

[ottawak]

Yes. On this forum

And it's almost always biblical creationists speaking to Traditional Christians.

 

[BPPLEE]

Do I get to fly around the building once per day for six days, then seven times the seventh?

I'm still curious who mandates it when atheists murder people?

 

[AV1611VET]

Frequently--by Fundamentalists.

Riiight.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Yes, I'm all about education. Now, please do me the honors and respond to the following post:

Rejection of evolution correlates with racism

Ah yes, that post following the one where I said you could use any framework you wanted...... and you danced away. I think you'll find the one person in this thread refusing to address questions is @2PhiloVoid

 

[AV1611VET]

Not in those precise words, but in ways more subtle, yes.

Same here.

 

[BPPLEE]

And it's almost always biblical creationists speaking to Traditional Christians.

What is the definition of a Traditional Christian? Creationists are not Traditional Christians?

 

[AV1611VET]

Yes. On this forum.

Ouch!

 

[Bungle_Bear]

This thread turned into a discussion about Christians following orders from God to do immoral acts.

No it didn't, despite your attempt to take it there.

Whose orders are atheists following when they murder people?

Vladimir Putin's?

 

[AV1611VET]

And it's almost always biblical creationists speaking to Traditional Christians.

???

 

[ottawak]

You may have to explain what you're intending to mean specifically when you use the term "Bible God."

I'm guessing you mean to refer to something along the lines of 'hyper-fundamentalist balderdash' rather than merely to some kind of subtle reference to the questionable parsing of someone like Marcion.

I like that "hyper-fundamentalist balderdash" and yes, that's roughly what I mean by "Bible God." In fact, you are the first person I have come across who used the term to mean anything else.

 

[BPPLEE]

No it didn't, despite your attempt to take it there.

Vladimir Putin's?

It wasn't me who took it there

 

[AV1611VET]

I'm still curious who mandates it when atheists murder people?

Satan.

John 8:44b He was a murderer from the beginning,

 

[ottawak]

???

Because our Christianity is not authentic.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

It wasn't me who took it there

It was you who kept trying, but others kept pulling it back.

 

[AV1611VET]

What is the definition of a Traditional Christian? Creationists are not Traditional Christians?

That's the first thing I thought of.

I think he typed that too fast.

 

[2PhiloVoid]

Ah yes, that post following the one where I said you could use any framework you wanted...... and you danced away. I think you'll find the one person in this thread refusing to address questions is @2PhiloVoid

No, I didn't "dance away." I asked you to engage and you didn't. Anyone can clearly see you disengaged...and conveniently disappeared after that with no response to that particular post. I don't believe in explaining "my framework." I'm not here to supply you with some replacement for a faulty framework. I'm here to test YOURS!!

And you know why, right? You've been keeping up with my epistemological identity all along and everywhere I've said something on CF, right?

 

[BPPLEE]

It was you who kept trying, but others kept pulling it back.

In your imagination. At least be honest