• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Christian ministry under threat...

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,968
10,837
77
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟867,272.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Ok, I don’t know anyone who does that, but maybe that’s because I move solely in the circles of the most traditional liturgical churches where the average age of the standard hymns is about 1,200 years.
It's relatively common in Pentecostal circles. There is the belief that prayer is a force in itself to achieve desired results. Similar to faith, where the naming and claiming contingent have the attitude, "If I believe hard enough, it will happen."
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,968
10,837
77
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟867,272.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
If this is a common problem, do you think 'conversion therapy' is widespread?
I don't know. The concept was unknown when I was involved in the Pentecostal movement in the 1970s. I never came across anything like it when I was involved with Rodney Francis in The Gospel Faith Messenger ministry.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,674
6,100
Visit site
✟1,041,314.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
For when there is time to continue the discussion of definitions, here are some of the relevant statements:

Carl Emerson said:
Healthy Christian marriage does not have lust.
Homosexual activity is driven by lust.

rturner76 said:
Fornication is also driven by lust and that is straight attraction so what's the difference i terms of lustful desires? Is it preferential to be in straight lust? I don't think so. It's not the orientation but the lust that is at issue.

PloverWing said:
This post surprised me, so I want to make sure I have understood you correctly. It sounds like you're using the word "lust" to mean sexual desire that occurs outside of heterosexual marriage. So, by definition, sexual desire within heterosexual marriage is not lust; and sexual desire in any other context (including same-sex couples and unmarried opposite-sex couples) is, by definition, lust. Is that a correct understanding of what you're saying?

The Liturgist said:
I myself define lust as any sexual desire which does not arise from love. So specifically if you just want to have sex with someone. It is a dangerous passion which is at the root of most divorces and unwanted pregnancies and STDs, and which also is the driving force behind the porn industry and prostitution.

Carl Emerson said:
What I am saying is that we were created to procreate in Love not lust. A healthy Christian marriage will not on any level be motivated by lust.

There are plenty of Christian marriages that are lust driven and they generally don't last.

However a homosexual is fundamentally lust driven if I understand Romans 1 correctly.

This means any homosexual union cannot be free of lust.

Lust is not just sexual desire outside of heterosexual marriage. Lust is common in Christian marriage but is self gratification, sinful, and not the Love of Jesus.

The suggestion that lust is needed to procreate is a nonsense.

The Liturgist said:
Basically, lust occurs when we love someone or see someone attractive and desire to have sexual relations with that person (or animal).* It is a result of a demonic assault on the normal cognitive response to the beauty of God’s creation.

Paidiske said:
I do not, for example, accept a simple equivalence of attraction, desire and lust. I think each of those things is quite distinct, and I think much of the issue here is that people are equating attraction (finding someone or something pleasing or appealing), with desire (the will to act in particular ways). Yet I can find someone attractive and yet have no desire (will) to do anything improper with them.

The Liturgist said:
We are on the same page, almost. The only difference is that I regard lust and the desire for sexual relations to be synonymous. This is based on our Lord saying that a married person who desires carnal knowledge of someone other than their spouse has committed adultery in their heart.

Attraction is completely legitimate, provided it is non sexual. For example, it is natural for parents to find their children attractive, and for adults to find other human beings and animals attractive, as well as all aspects of God’s creation. I would argue we are meant to be attracted to everything God has created, because attraction facilitates love, and we should love all of creation, especially life, and especially every human life. This attraction as you say is finding someone or something pleasing and appealing. And as you say we can have attraction without the desire for inappropriate relations.

For example, I find my Dodge Charger R/T with its V8 Hemi and superb gas mileage on the highway very attractive, yet I have no desire for a romantic relationship with it. Likewise with my computers. And even more attractive is my mother, and my relatives. My cousins are beautiful. My first girlfriend, Rachel, who is recovering from breast cancer, who was my girlfriend when I was 15 and 16 and she was a year younger, who is now single, has two beautiful boys, aged 8 and 14, who resemble her and her mother Christa. Their family has beautiful noses. Every member of my congregation is beautiful to me. I do not lust after any of them. Indeed I would rather die than engage in sexual relations with any of the above, and if someone attempted to force me into such at gunpoint, I would recite the creed in the hope of receiving a crown of martyrdom.

Lust would be if desired carnal knowledge of any of these people or things, and concupiscence would be if I engaged in such relations or fantasized about them in an inappropriate manner while engaging in an act which is one of the two possibilities for the sin committed by Onan. Thus, pornography exists to stimulate the passion of lust and to enable concupiscence without the necessity of another participant or while engaged in relations even with one’s lawful spouse while fantasizing about someone else.


Paidiske said:
I think our understanding of the terms is close, if not precisely the same. The key point I was making though, is that I do not see one's sexual orientation as being inextricably lustful.

The Liturgist said:
Indeed, but if you eliminate lust you eliminate homosexuality, which as I have explained is a result of the confusion of normal attraction with sexual attraction, or to put it another way, a desire to have sex with what one is attracted to.

Carl Emerson said:

It seems clear to me that you will have to do more work on coming to agreement on definition.

Please can we adjourn and take more care over this important matter - you are both under time pressure.

 
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,510
10,385
79
Auckland
✟437,805.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't know. The concept was unknown when I was involved in the Pentecostal movement in the 1970s. I never came across anything like it when I was involved with Rodney Francis in The Gospel Faith Messenger ministry.

Exactly - it was virtually unheard of here in New Zealand.

But during the hearings the LGBT community was encouraged to bring complaints from folk about not feeling comfortable after being prayed for and such - this fuelled the process of banning attempts to help those who want to be done with their same sex 'orientation'.

At the same time claims from christians being gloriously freed have no been given the same weight.

One is considered evidence - the other here-say.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,674
6,100
Visit site
✟1,041,314.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In trying to come to some understanding on definitions:

I John 2:15 Do not love the world or the things in the world. If anyone loves the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16 For all that is in the world—the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life—is not of the Father but is of the world. 17 And the world is passing away, and the lust of it; but he who does the will of God abides forever.

As John Paul II in the Theology of the Body pointed out lust is here identified as not of the Father, but of the world. The lust of the world will pass with it.

So whatever we think lust is defined as, it is not part of God's creation plan, and will not be part of His redemption plan.

Marriage, and the one flesh union, are part of God's creation plan as testified to by Jesus in Matthew 19, referring back to Genesis. Therefore, we can agree with the sentiment (and all seem to have so far) that marriage, as originally instituted by God, does not involve lust. Lust is not of God.

Examining what was intended in the one flesh relationship, instead of lust, seems necessary to help define lust.

Gen 2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
Gen 2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
Gen 2:23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
Gen 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.
Gen 2:25 And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed.

There is a mutuality of being, a becoming one flesh, and there was lack of shame, hiding, etc. from one another.

Gen 1:27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Gen 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

Being fruitful, reproduction, was part of that plan, or openness to life as it is often called.


We can also see in some of the texts after sin was in the world some aspects of sex as intended, though now in the context of a sinful world, so mixed with advice regarding that.

1Co 7:2 Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.
1Co 7:3 Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband.
1Co 7:4 The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife.
1Co 7:5 Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.

As seen in the one flesh relationship it is an exclusive relationship. But it is also a relationship of giving of oneself to the other, mutually, for the good of the other. And it is by agreement, even when to refrain.


This mutuality, or giving of oneself, is not the same as lust.

So we can see both mutual giving and openness to life involved in God's plan.

So did this mutual giving aspect involve some attraction that is different than lust? Apparently so.

Pro 5:18 Let thy fountain be blessed: and rejoice with the wife of thy youth.
Pro 5:19 Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love.
Pro 5:20 And why wilt thou, my son, be ravished with a strange woman, and embrace the bosom of a stranger?
Pro 5:21 For the ways of man are before the eyes of the LORD, and he pondereth all his goings.
Pro 5:22 His own iniquities shall take the wicked himself, and he shall be holden with the cords of his sins.

There is an acceptable attraction within the context God placed it. Lust is something other than this mutual giving one to another within the context of the one flesh relationship.


Also, this attraction is in the context of love, and it is not simply aesthetic attraction, but attraction to the the person, and even includes physical aspects.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,674
6,100
Visit site
✟1,041,314.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Mat 5:27 Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery:
Mat 5:28 But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.

This text affirms that lust can happen without the physical involvement. It also highlights again that lust does not comprise of the mutual giving in the one flesh relationship. In fact, this is as a number of you have already noted, a selfish desire to use the person as a source of pleasure, rather than a mutual giving.


It also relates back to John's statement about lust, including the lust of the eye.

1Jn 2:16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world.


These both suggest that lust is, like other fleshly desires, selfish, centered on self. Whereas the Spirit causes us to love our neighbor, and to not focus on the self:

Gal 5:13 For you were called to freedom, brothers. Only do not use your freedom as an opportunity for the flesh, but through love serve one another.
Gal 5:14 For the whole law is fulfilled in one word: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”
Gal 5:15 But if you bite and devour one another, watch out that you are not consumed by one another.
Keep in Step with the Spirit
Gal 5:16 But I say, walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh.
Gal 5:17 For the desires of the flesh are against the Spirit, and the desires of the Spirit are against the flesh, for these are opposed to each other, to keep you from doing the things you want to do.
Gal 5:18 But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.
Gal 5:19 Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, sensuality,
Gal 5:20 idolatry, sorcery, enmity, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, rivalries, dissensions, divisions,
Gal 5:21 envy, drunkenness, orgies, and things like these. I warn you, as I warned you before, that those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.
Gal 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,
Gal 5:23 gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law.
Gal 5:24 And those who belong to Christ Jesus have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires.
Gal 5:25 If we live by the Spirit, let us also keep in step with the Spirit.
Gal 5:26 Let us not become conceited, provoking one another, envying one another.

Lust then, to my thinking, is a departure from God's intention of the mutual giving of each other in the context of the one flesh marriage relationship.

It could then also, as others have seemed to indicate, happen in marriage, but is not God's intent.

So in the extreme case to illustrate, forcing sex upon your spouse physically is not mutual, not a result of love, not experiencing the one flesh relationship, but driven by selfish desire, and therefore of the flesh, and therefore, we could call that lust.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,674
6,100
Visit site
✟1,041,314.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The question has come up whether homosexuality is driven by lust.

Perhaps a question that has to come first is whether sexual attraction to someone of the same sex was ever within God's creation plan. It was not indicated such in Genesis, or in Matthew 19. And the resulting sexual act is condemned in multiple places in the Scriptures. The act is also called contrary to nature.

If sexual attraction to one of the same sex is, like lust, not of the Father, not part of His creation plan, and is contrary to His design, then it has to be classified not as good, or neutral, but as a bad condition. It was not intended, and will not endure in the new earth. And it can cause someone to be tempted by something that is directly forbidden.

It is in this sense similar to other desires that are condemned, envy, enmity, etc. They are of the flesh and not what God wants for us, were not part of God's design, and won't be part of the world to come.

Now as to the intent of the sexual act which I noted earlier I see God's plan indicating both mutual giving in the one flesh relationship, and an openness to life. Homosexuality does not have openness to life.

But the reason some are reluctant to say it is driven by lust is because they see some of the mutuality in relationships where there is love between the people involved.

However, if it is outside of God's design, then it is ultimately selfish of us to pursue that which God does not allow, and since it is injurious to the people involved to go against God's will, it is also not giving in love to one another, but harming one another.

In this sense it is driven by a selfish desire, or lust. Because the ultimate end of it is not for the good of either person.

That brings us back to the notion that being tempted is not the same as sinning. True. But the Scriptures also calls some desires sinful. If the desire itself leads us to do something that is against God's will, then it is a sinful desire.

temptation to fornication is a sinful desire
temptation to adultery is a sinful desire
temptation to sexual thoughts or activity to someone of the same sex is a sinful desire
temptation to steal is a sinful desire
temptation to murder, or to hate, is a sinful desire.

These are all necessary to crucify, to say no to the intrusive thoughts. It is not sin to have these thoughts come unbidden to us in our fallen state. It is sin to then feed those thoughts.

But they are also not part of God's created order, or the future redeemed order.

So the notion that same sex orientation is not a problem, just the action, is not true. An attraction to something God does not want is not sin. But it is a sinful desire. It is a problem like any other sinful desire.

God does not remove all sinful desires at this time. We have the flesh still with us, to be crucified.

But it is also true that God can help us to renew our minds, to work in us to will and to do. We can see God working more in us and sometimes that means those desires do not plague us the way they did before. And not only can He make it to where we are not tempted to do wrong as often, He also works in us to do right.

Eph 4:20 But that is not the way you learned Christ!—
Eph 4:21 assuming that you have heard about him and were taught in him, as the truth is in Jesus,
Eph 4:22 to put off your old self, which belongs to your former manner of life and is corrupt through deceitful desires,
Eph 4:23 and to be renewed in the spirit of your minds,
Eph 4:24 and to put on the new self, created after the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness.
Eph 4:25 Therefore, having put away falsehood, let each one of you speak the truth with his neighbor, for we are members one of another.
Eph 4:26 Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger,
Eph 4:27 and give no opportunity to the devil.
Eph 4:28 Let the thief no longer steal, but rather let him labor, doing honest work with his own hands, so that he may have something to share with anyone in need.
Eph 4:29 Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.
Eph 4:30 And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.
Eph 4:31 Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice.
Eph 4:32 Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.

The opposite of stealing is not cessation from stealing, but working so you can give.
The opposite of malice is not just cessation from malice, but being kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving as Christ forgave you.

If we were to say someone had a stealing orientation or a giving orientation we would not consider a stealing orientation to be a good thing.

And we would not just want that person to stop stealing. We would want the Spirit to live in that person so that the person becomes more like One who lives in them, so that the person gives of themselves to others.

And I would pray for the Spirit to so work in that person that they would want to give instead of steal.



 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Carl Emerson
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,674
6,100
Visit site
✟1,041,314.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Now the above is admittedly more complicated in the case of marriage, sexuality, etc.

The opposite of stealing is giving to others. Giving to others is something we are all called to, to be like Christ, serving.

However, a Christian may be called to either a life of singleness to the Lord or to a life of marriage, per 1 Corinthians 7, and Matthew 19.

So whether the Lord decides to so transform someone's mind that they are then able to enter into God's plan for marriage, or whether He enables them to serve the Lord without distraction, giving up themselves that way, that is up to Him.

But I don't put limitations on what He can do with His own creation and re-creation, by His Spirit.

And to think that someone who has Christ living in them will not, if they keep walking in that Spirit, start to share in some of the thinking of the one who lives in them seems contrary to what the Scriptures tell us.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,674
6,100
Visit site
✟1,041,314.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I believe @tall73 and @Carl Emerson have already provided case studies. Perhaps we should take a step back and review the data.

These are the only studies I have presented, and we can believe them completely:

Eph 4:20 But that is not the way you learned Christ!—
Eph 4:21 assuming that you have heard about him and were taught in him, as the truth is in Jesus,
Eph 4:22 to put off your old self, which belongs to your former manner of life and is corrupt through deceitful desires,
Eph 4:23 and to be renewed in the spirit of your minds,
Eph 4:24 and to put on the new self, created after the likeness of God in true righteousness and holiness.
Eph 4:25 Therefore, having put away falsehood, let each one of you speak the truth with his neighbor, for we are members one of another.
Eph 4:26 Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger,
Eph 4:27 and give no opportunity to the devil.
Eph 4:28 Let the thief no longer steal, but rather let him labor, doing honest work with his own hands, so that he may have something to share with anyone in need.
Eph 4:29 Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear.
Eph 4:30 And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.
Eph 4:31 Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice.
Eph 4:32 Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.

1Co 6:9 Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality,
1Co 6:10 nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

1Co 6:11 And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.

2Pe 1:3 His divine power has granted to us all things that pertain to life and godliness, through the knowledge of him who called us to his own glory and excellence,

2Pe 1:4 by which he has granted to us his precious and very great promises, so that through them you may become partakers of the divine nature, having escaped from the corruption that is in the world because of sinful desire.

Php 2:12 Therefore, my beloved, as you have always obeyed, so now, not only as in my presence but much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling,
Php 2:13 for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure.

Rom 12:1 I appeal to you therefore, brothers, by the mercies of God, to present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God, which is your spiritual worship.
Rom 12:2 Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.


 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,510
10,385
79
Auckland
✟437,805.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Now the above is admittedly more complicated in the case of marriage, sexuality, etc.

The opposite of stealing is giving to others. Giving to others is something we are all called to, to be like Christ, serving.

However, a Christian may be called to either a life of singleness to the Lord or to a life of marriage, per 1 Corinthians 7, and Matthew 19.

So whether the Lord decides to so transform someone's mind that they are then able to enter into God's plan for marriage, or whether He enables them to serve the Lord without distraction, giving up themselves that way, that is up to Him.

But I don't put limitations on what He can do with His own creation and re-creation, by His Spirit.

And to think that someone who has Christ living in them will not, if they keep walking in that Spirit, start to share in some of the thinking of the one who lives in them seems contrary to what the Scriptures tell us.

Thanks for pulling the threads together - much appreciated.
 
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,674
6,100
Visit site
✟1,041,314.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Thanks for pulling the threads together - much appreciated.


Well I had to think some of it through myself again to make sure I could put it into words. It is a complicated subject.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,968
10,837
77
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟867,272.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Exactly - it was virtually unheard of here in New Zealand.

But during the hearings the LGBT community was encouraged to bring complaints from folk about not feeling comfortable after being prayed for and such - this fuelled the process of banning attempts to help those who want to be done with their same sex 'orientation'.

At the same time claims from christians being gloriously freed have no been given the same weight.

One is considered evidence - the other here-say.
i've never heard of anyone being prayed for against their will. In most Pentecostal churches an invitation is given for those requesting prayer to go forward to the front to meet with the ministry team. Totally voluntary. Of course the LGBT people would leave that fact out.
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,173
8,504
Canada
✟881,537.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
i've never heard of anyone being prayed for against their will.
It was a common practice for prayer meetings to pray for unsaved people, or people perceived to be unsaved. I'm pretty sure they didn't request being prayed for.
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,968
10,837
77
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟867,272.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
It was a common practice for prayer meetings to pray for unsaved people, or people perceived to be unsaved. I'm pretty sure they didn't request being prayed for.
It's not normal for unsaved people to attend church prayer meetings. I think it would be silly for a church member to actually invite an unsaved person to a prayer meeting. The invite would be more to an evangelistic service where the Gospel would be preached.
 
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,510
10,385
79
Auckland
✟437,805.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
i've never heard of anyone being prayed for against their will. In most Pentecostal churches an invitation is given for those requesting prayer to go forward to the front to meet with the ministry team. Totally voluntary. Of course the LGBT people would leave that fact out.

But the Bill makes it illegal to pray in the sexual preference area even when permission is given.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
35,803
20,099
45
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,702,337.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
An attraction to something God does not want is not sin. But it is a sinful desire.

Most of your summary is excellent. I think I have two problems with where you landed with all of this, and both of them relate to this bit.

First is, again, that you have equated attraction with desire, when I see those as quite separate. (Again, I can find someone quite attractive while having no desire - no will - to act on the attraction in any improper way).

But the second is that to me, if you say someone has a "sinful desire," that is an accusation that they are sinning by what they will to do. To me, to say that someone's desire is not sin, but a sinful desire, makes no sense. How can a sinful desire not be sin, by definition?

Oh, and I've been prayed for in situations where, if it wasn't exactly entirely against my will, the way things played out also wasn't a situation in which I had given full and informed consent, either.
 
Upvote 0

Carl Emerson

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2017
15,510
10,385
79
Auckland
✟437,805.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Most of your summary is excellent. I think I have two problems with where you landed with all of this, and both of them relate to this bit.

First is, again, that you have equated attraction with desire, when I see those as quite separate. (Again, I can find someone quite attractive while having no desire - no will - to act on the attraction in any improper way).

But the second is that to me, if you say someone has a "sinful desire," that is an accusation that they are sinning by what they will to do. To me, to say that someone's desire is not sin, but a sinful desire, makes no sense. How can a sinful desire not be sin, by definition?

Oh, and I've been prayed for in situations where, if it wasn't exactly entirely against my will, the way things played out also wasn't a situation in which I had given full and informed consent, either.

The sin of coveting is a case of attraction without desire.

I can covet my neighbours car without any desire to steal it.

That is still a sin.


Jesus said...

Matthew 5:28
but I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

So in the case of same sex attraction being lust driven, the attraction itself is of the flesh and therefore sinful.
 
Upvote 0

Paidiske

Clara bonam audax
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2016
35,803
20,099
45
Albury, Australia
Visit site
✟1,702,337.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The sin of coveting is a case of attraction without desire.

I understand it completely differently. In my understanding, the sin of coveting is a case of attraction with desire. It's one thing to admire your neighbour's car, and it's no sin. But to want your neighbour's car, to be willing - were the circumstances favourable and you thought you could get away with it - to somehow obtain your neighbour's car, or the use of it; that's when it's coveting, and a sin. It's Ahab being willing to kill Naboth to get his vineyard, for example.

Similarly with the lust Jesus speaks of. It's not lust, or sin, to find someone attractive. That's just part of being human. It tips over into sinful lust when you want to use that person for your pleasure; when - were the circumstances favourable and you thought you could get away with it - you would go there with them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PloverWing
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,674
6,100
Visit site
✟1,041,314.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I In my understanding, the sin of coveting is a case of attraction with desire. It's one thing to admire your neighbour's car, and it's no sin. But to want your neighbour's car, to be willing - were the circumstances favourable and you thought you could get away with it - to somehow obtain your neighbour's car, or the use of it; that's when it's coveting, and a sin. It's Ahab being willing to kill Naboth to get his vineyard, for example.

Ok, let's break it down a bit further.

I can think a car looks cool with no desire to own it, and certainly no desire to steal it. For instance, I couldn't sit comfortably in a Mazda Miata even if I wanted to, but I could still think they look cool.

Aesthetic appreciation is different than a desire that tempts you. One is just appreciating beauty, the other is a legitimate temptation to do something.

Obviously appreciation of beauty is not sin.

And temptation is not sin either, but it is what is referred to as a sinful desire, not because the desire itself is sin, but because it is a temptation to something that would be sinful.

So let's say that someone who has always liked sports cars, but does not have the money to buy one sees a review of the sports car that he wants in a magazine. He may like the look of it, read up on all the features, hope to buy one someday, etc. That is appreciation. He likes the car.

But then let's say that his friend from high school who had done really well for himself lately pulls up in that sports car that he wanted and he gets a feeling in his stomach because he really wants to be in that friend's position. Now it is a temptation A temptation to covet is when that general appeal turns into the temptation to sit around stewing about how he should have that car instead of his friend, how he deserves it, and his friend doesn't even know what the car can do, etc.

Coveting would be if he gives into the above and actually does sit around stewing.

So an aesthetic appeal is not the same as that next level where something is responding inside of us that wants to do something wrong. That is temptation. And that is a sinful desire because

a. it comes from our sinful nature, the flesh. That flesh is inside us and responds to the situation with enticement.
b to give into it would be to sin.

But now let's look at that in terms of sexual attraction. For simplicity we will take the case of a single person. So for that person (whether straight or gay) any decision to look at a person and actively lust after them would be sin.

You can find people of either sex to be aesthetically appealing, without any sexual thoughts at all, as @The Liturgist noted earlier, just as you might find a sunset or a flower aesthetically appealing.

But the actual temptation comes in when you see a person and the temptation hits to continue looking and foster sexual thoughts. This is not yet sin. But it is temptation. And it is a sinful desire because

a. it comes from your flesh, your sinful nature

b. To give into this desire is to sin.

The actual sin occurs when you go ahead and give into the temptation to take that second and third look, etc. That is now lust. The desire that tempts is not lust itself, but is tempting one to do so.

Sexual orientation is not just an aesthetic appreciation, like enjoying art, or architecture, etc.

It is that second level, beyond aesthetic appreciation, and which can present as temptation. It is not just an appreciation of beauty, but a sexual attraction.

Similarly with the lust Jesus speaks of. It's not lust, or sin, to find someone attractive.

Agreed. Now if you mean aesthetically attractive, it definitely is not.

If you mean sexually attractive, that is where it gets difficult for fallen people. Sometimes we may be tempted, sometimes not. If it does tempt a person that is not lust yet. But it is a temptation to lust. And that comes from our sinful nature.

I don't know how it works out for you. I just know how it can with me, and a number of other folks I have talked to.

A person could be scrolling through a news story, come to a provocative ad and, boom, that person now finds that they have to actively decide between asking the Lord to dismiss this thought, or taking a second look. That instant flesh-based temptation is the result of the the desire that is within us. That is a sinful desire, because to give into it is to commit the sin of lust.

And it is called a desire, because on some level we want it! We usually are not tempted by what we don't want. Most folks are more tempted by donuts than broccoli for instance. You are tempted by donuts because you want them!

If we had no sinful nature within us that responded to the person, then we wouldn't be tempted to think sexual thoughts outside of the context God designed, outside of mutual giving.

But in a sinful world, with a sinful nature, there is something in us that responds, which allows us to be tempted. That something is the flesh. And the flesh has desires.

James describes this in detail:

Jas 1:14 But each person is tempted when he is lured and enticed by his own desire.
Jas 1:15 Then desire when it has conceived gives birth to sin, and sin when it is fully grown brings forth death.

Gestation of sin:

-lured and enticed by desire
-desire conceives
-gives birth to sin
-brings forth death.

So the initial stage is something in us wants what we shouldn't. We are lured or enticed. At this point we can immediately say no. And if we do, that is the end of it. Notice that James says we are tempted when we are enticed by our own desire. That is the definition of temptation for James. So the temptation is the action of the desire within us (from the sinful nature, for a sinful action) that entices us.

But if we convince ourselves to consider for a moment, giving various reasons or excuses, etc. then we may move on to that split moment where we decide to go forward, that moment of conception which puts into motion something that is not going to be stopped.

Then it gives birth to full on sin as we go ahead and jump fully in.

Finally the outcome is death.

That initial enticement is from our sinful desires, our flesh.


That's just part of being human. It tips over into sinful lust when you want to use that person for your pleasure; when - were the circumstances favourable and you thought you could get away with it - you would go there with them.

But the temptation itself is a sign that you WANT something you should not. The problem is inside you! Your flesh desires it. You don't get tempted by something you don't want at all, on some level. That is why it is a sinful desire. It comes from your sinful nature, and it desires what is sinful.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

tall73

Sophia7's husband
Site Supporter
Sep 23, 2005
32,674
6,100
Visit site
✟1,041,314.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
With that background, I am now coming back to this:

To me, to say that someone's desire is not sin, but a sinful desire, makes no sense. How can a sinful desire not be sin, by definition?

A sinful desire is not sin in itself. But a sinful desire is so called because:

a. it wouldn't exist if we didn't have a fallen sinful nature that wants sinful things.
b. to give in to that desire is to sin.

Simply put it is a desire.....to sin.....

It is not actually sin until you give into the desire.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0