People are inherently good??

Dietrich Johnson

Active Member
Dec 5, 2021
150
37
California
✟24,673.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
In reading the Orthodox Study Bible, I have repeatedly come across comments that suggest that people are inherently good. From the Orthodox perspective, how does this correspond to the sin of Adam and Eve (and their related punishment)?
 
  • Useful
Reactions: royal priest

HTacianas

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2018
8,490
8,999
Florida
✟324,440.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
In reading the Orthodox Study Bible, I have repeatedly come across comments that suggest that people are inherently good. From the Orthodox perspective, how does this correspond to the sin of Adam and Eve (and their related punishment)?

The Orthodox view of original sin differs from the Western Augustinian view that seemingly reaches its fulfillment in the views of Calvinism. In the Western view, all people are born to condemnation as a result of original sin. The Eastern view is different. All people are born into salvation, yet fall into condemnation when they follow their propensity to sin. It is that propensity to sin that is inherited as a result of original sin, but not the guilt of original sin. It's as much to ask, "is a stillborn child condemned to hell for eternity"? The Western view of original sin has it that the child is condemned. The Eastern view has it that the child has not sinned and is therefore not condemned.
 
Upvote 0

Ligurian

Cro-Magnon
Apr 21, 2021
3,589
536
America
✟22,234.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Private
In reading the Orthodox Study Bible, I have repeatedly come across comments that suggest that people are inherently good. From the Orthodox perspective, how does this correspond to the sin of Adam and Eve (and their related punishment)?

Jeremiah 31:30-36


The Orthodox view of original sin differs from the Western Augustinian view that seemingly reaches its fulfillment in the views of Calvinism. In the Western view, all people are born to condemnation as a result of original sin. The Eastern view is different. All people are born into salvation, yet fall into condemnation when they follow their propensity to sin. It is that propensity to sin that is inherited as a result of original sin, but not the guilt of original sin. It's as much to ask, "is a stillborn child condemned to hell for eternity"? The Western view of original sin has it that the child is condemned. The Eastern view has it that the child has not sinned and is therefore not condemned.

Augustine doesn't represent ALL of the west... and he never did.

"BE it known (and without doubt) unto you, that we all, and every one of us, are obedient and subject to the Church of God, and to the Pope of Rome, and to every godly Christian, to love every one in his degree, in perfect Charity, and to help every one of them, by word and deed to be Children of God: And other obedience than this I do not know to be due to him whom you name to be Pope; nor by the Father of Fathers to be claimed or demanded. And this obedience we are ready to give and pay to him, and to every Christian continually. Besides, we are under the government of the Bishop of Caerleon upon Uske, who is to oversee under God over us, and cause us to keep the way spiritual.
...
Austin {Augustine} having met with this affront, and perceiving that the Britons were stronger in their Faith than he by his Miracles, cast about to try the Saxons courtesie; that what the Ephod could not, the Sword wrapt up therein should. I say not that he procured, but he threatned or prophesied the destruction of the Monks of Bangor; and it came to pass, and the accasion by writers loudly suspected."
--Nathaniel Bacon, An historical and political discourse of the laws & government of England
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A59082.0001.001?rgn=main;view=fulltext

So... Britain may have been the first protestant church... if not for the fact that Augustine {Austin} came after the Gospel was already planted in Britain.

This is why Pelagius the Briton was called a heretic... against the Papacy.

"In these words of Pelagius (ad Demetr. 2 init.) we recognize distinctly his moral temperament. (a) God has commanded man to do that which is good; he must, therefore, have the ability to do it. That is to say, man is free, i.e., it is possible for him to decide for or against that which is good: “But we say that man is (always) able both to sin and not to sin, so that we confess ourselves to have always a free will" (Pel. in his confession)."
--Seeburg, Text-book of the History of Doctrines

Galileo was also called a heretic... :cool:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
41,550
20,063
41
Earth
✟1,464,124.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
In reading the Orthodox Study Bible, I have repeatedly come across comments that suggest that people are inherently good. From the Orthodox perspective, how does this correspond to the sin of Adam and Eve (and their related punishment)?

yes, because the good God only creates good creatures. the sin of Adam and Eve brought evil, which is a parasitic corruption, misuse, and twisting of the good. evil isn’t a thing as such.
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
41,550
20,063
41
Earth
✟1,464,124.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Jeremiah 31:30-36




Augustine doesn't represent ALL of the west... and he never did.

"BE it known (and without doubt) unto you, that we all, and every one of us, are obedient and subject to the Church of God, and to the Pope of Rome, and to every godly Christian, to love every one in his degree, in perfect Charity, and to help every one of them, by word and deed to be Children of God: And other obedience than this I do not know to be due to him whom you name to be Pope; nor by the Father of Fathers to be claimed or demanded. And this obedience we are ready to give and pay to him, and to every Christian continually. Besides, we are under the government of the Bishop of Caerleon upon Uske, who is to oversee under God over us, and cause us to keep the way spiritual.
...
Austin {Augustine} having met with this affront, and perceiving that the Britons were stronger in their Faith than he by his Miracles, cast about to try the Saxons courtesie; that what the Ephod could not, the Sword wrapt up therein should. I say not that he procured, but he threatned or prophesied the destruction of the Monks of Bangor; and it came to pass, and the accasion by writers loudly suspected."
--Nathaniel Bacon, An historical and political discourse of the laws & government of England
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A59082.0001.001?rgn=main;view=fulltext

So... Britain may have been the first protestant church... if not for the fact that Augustine {Austin} came after the Gospel was already planted in Britain.

This is why Pelagius the Briton was called a heretic... against the Papacy.

"In these words of Pelagius (ad Demetr. 2 init.) we recognize distinctly his moral temperament. (a) God has commanded man to do that which is good; he must, therefore, have the ability to do it. That is to say, man is free, i.e., it is possible for him to decide for or against that which is good: “But we say that man is (always) able both to sin and not to sin, so that we confess ourselves to have always a free will" (Pel. in his confession)."
--Seeburg, Text-book of the History of Doctrines

Galileo was also called a heretic... :cool:

what does this have to do with the topic?
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In reading the Orthodox Study Bible, I have repeatedly come across comments that suggest that people are inherently good. From the Orthodox perspective, how does this correspond to the sin of Adam and Eve (and their related punishment)?

Everything is inherently good. Evil is inherently destructive to what is good.
But the good must be there first.
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
41,550
20,063
41
Earth
✟1,464,124.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Natural human goodness is obstructed by death. The law in my flesh opposes the law I will.
Remove death, removes the law that rules my body.
Then it is free to serve what I will.

the OP asked the Orthodox perspective. this isn’t the Orthodox perspective.
 
Upvote 0

Vap841

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2021
431
252
54
East Coast
✟39,498.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
The Orthodox view of original sin differs from the Western Augustinian view that seemingly reaches its fulfillment in the views of Calvinism. In the Western view, all people are born to condemnation as a result of original sin. The Eastern view is different. All people are born into salvation, yet fall into condemnation when they follow their propensity to sin. It is that propensity to sin that is inherited as a result of original sin, but not the guilt of original sin. It's as much to ask, "is a stillborn child condemned to hell for eternity"? The Western view of original sin has it that the child is condemned. The Eastern view has it that the child has not sinned and is therefore not condemned.
I’ll take a slice of the Orthodox view, with a side dish of free will. Last time you got some determinism on my plate so I didn’t leave a tip!
 
Upvote 0

ArmyMatt

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Jan 26, 2007
41,550
20,063
41
Earth
✟1,464,124.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
I’ll take a slice of the Orthodox view, with a side dish of free will. Last time you got some determinism on my plate so I didn’t leave a tip!

we believe in free will. in fact, that’s one of the stamps we are in God’s image.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vap841
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Dorothea

One of God's handmaidens
Jul 10, 2007
21,553
3,534
Colorado Springs, Colorado
✟240,539.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Pardon me. This is the subforum The Ancient Way, which is for Orthodox Christians. Why are people who aren't Orthodox responding in here to an Orthodox question?
 
Upvote 0

prodromos

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Nov 28, 2003
21,561
12,109
58
Sydney, Straya
✟1,178,962.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Jeremiah 31:30-36




Augustine doesn't represent ALL of the west... and he never did.

"BE it known (and without doubt) unto you, that we all, and every one of us, are obedient and subject to the Church of God, and to the Pope of Rome, and to every godly Christian, to love every one in his degree, in perfect Charity, and to help every one of them, by word and deed to be Children of God: And other obedience than this I do not know to be due to him whom you name to be Pope; nor by the Father of Fathers to be claimed or demanded. And this obedience we are ready to give and pay to him, and to every Christian continually. Besides, we are under the government of the Bishop of Caerleon upon Uske, who is to oversee under God over us, and cause us to keep the way spiritual.
...
Austin {Augustine} having met with this affront, and perceiving that the Britons were stronger in their Faith than he by his Miracles, cast about to try the Saxons courtesie; that what the Ephod could not, the Sword wrapt up therein should. I say not that he procured, but he threatned or prophesied the destruction of the Monks of Bangor; and it came to pass, and the accasion by writers loudly suspected."
--Nathaniel Bacon, An historical and political discourse of the laws & government of England
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A59082.0001.001?rgn=main;view=fulltext

So... Britain may have been the first protestant church... if not for the fact that Augustine {Austin} came after the Gospel was already planted in Britain.

This is why Pelagius the Briton was called a heretic... against the Papacy.

"In these words of Pelagius (ad Demetr. 2 init.) we recognize distinctly his moral temperament. (a) God has commanded man to do that which is good; he must, therefore, have the ability to do it. That is to say, man is free, i.e., it is possible for him to decide for or against that which is good: “But we say that man is (always) able both to sin and not to sin, so that we confess ourselves to have always a free will" (Pel. in his confession)."
--Seeburg, Text-book of the History of Doctrines

Galileo was also called a heretic... :cool:
I think you have your Augustines confused.
 
Upvote 0

Ligurian

Cro-Magnon
Apr 21, 2021
3,589
536
America
✟22,234.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Private
Austin having met with this affront, and perceiving that the Britons were stronger in their Faith than he by his Miracles, cast about to try the Saxons courtesie; that what the Ephod could not, the Sword wrapt up therein should. I say not that he procured, but he threatned or prophesied the destruction of the Monks of Bangor; and it came to pass, and the accasion by writers loudly suspected."
--Nathaniel Bacon, An historical and political discourse of the laws & government of England
https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A59082.0001.001?rgn=main;view=fulltext

So... Britain may have been the first protestant church... if not for the fact that Augustine {Austin} came after the Gospel was already planted in Britain.

I think you have your Augustines confused.

This is the Augustine that Nathaniel Bacon called Austin... quoted here:

"Is that your answer?" said Augustine angrily, (and his blood boiled within him as he spoke,) "Is that your story? Perhaps you will repent this hereafter. If you do not think proper to join us in preaching the gospel to the Saxons, rely upon it, the time will come, and that speedily, when you will receive death at their hands."
A view of the primitive ages. In two parts : Evans, Theophilus

And the Trial of Pelagius is here:
A view of the primitive ages. In two parts : Evans, Theophilus

The text of some of this book is here:
Massacre at Bangor-is-y-coed
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Lukaris
Upvote 0