• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Premillennialism ignores the tenses in the original Greek in order to sustain its teaching

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,610
2,867
MI
✟442,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
What about the last vials of wrath? Is not that the wrath of God? Don't some of you have the vials of wrath already being poured out before Christ even returns? How does it make sense that if the sudden destruction that one can't escape, that it occurs once the 2nd coming occurs, but in the meantime they have been being bombarded with the vials of wrath, which then makes nonsense out of them saying peace and safety at the time, which is what they are saying when sudden destruction comes upon them? No one in their right mind could be saying peace and safety if they have been being bombarded with the vials of wrath.
Are you sure about that? Read Revelation 9:14-21. I'll quote the last couple verses.

Revelation 9:20 And the rest of the men which were not killed by these plagues yet repented not of the works of their hands, that they should not worship devils, and idols of gold, and silver, and brass, and stone, and of wood: which neither can see, nor hear, nor walk: 21 Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts.

This is what it says after a description of a third of men (people) on earth being killed after the sixth trumpet sounds. You are underestimating how hardened some people's hearts are. Many people, despite tragedies and catastrophies going on around them, continue to refuse to repent and continue living as if nothing has happened. We're seeing that today with the Covid pandemic. It should be a wakeup call for many unbelievers and make them think about their mortality, but they continue on with their wickedness and refuse to repent. They think they are spiritually at peace and safe from God's wrath. But, they will find out otherwise on the day Christ returns and brings "sudden destruction" upon them from which "they shall not escape".
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,610
2,867
MI
✟442,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes it makes sense. It means they still wait in patience for those 1000 years, even after fire destroys this current heaven and earth. There is a new heaven and earth at the beginning of the 1000 years, and it is not the NHNE of Revelation 21.
That is utter nonsense. Nowhere does scripture teach that there will be 2 new heavens and new earths. That belief can't be taken seriously at all.

Noah lived through heaven and earth being destroyed,
What? How was heaven destroyed by the flood?
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,610
2,867
MI
✟442,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Then that day is after the 1000 years. That is when the dead are raised to be judged! That is if you mean all the people who have ever lived (unsaved). Now if you mean destroy the wicked and in so doing they are judged, well fine, we can have that when Jesus returns right away. You can't have it both ways.
Matthew 25:31-46 makes it quite clear that the unsaved will be judged when Christ returns. So, why do you not have them being judged until 1000+ years later?

Can you tell me how you interpret this passage:

Matthew 13:47 “Once again, the kingdom of heaven is like a net that was let down into the lake and caught all kinds of fish. 48 When it was full, the fishermen pulled it up on the shore. Then they sat down and collected the good fish in baskets, but threw the bad away. 49 This is how it will be at the end of the age. The angels will come and separate the wicked from the righteous 50 and throw them into the blazing furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

Do you believe that Jesus will return at the end of the age (Matt 24:3)? If so, wasn't He quite clear that both the righteous and the wicked will be judged at that time?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

power1

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2021
721
127
canada
Visit site
✟32,782.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The error you make is you cannot prove a rapture of the Church followed by a 7-year tribulation followed by a 3rd coming. That is because it doesn't exist. You can search the Scripture but you will never find it. That is why you have nothing to present.
Either the wrath of God in the Tribulation is part of the wrath of God that culminates at His return or not. The bible days that the plagues of that time indeed are the wrath of God. You are overruled.
 
Upvote 0

power1

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2021
721
127
canada
Visit site
✟32,782.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I've been telling you what I believe all along. I don't need to be clear. I've been clear. You need to pay closer attention. None of us believe that the thousand years occur in one 24 hour day. You should know what the people you're debating with believe. It makes no sense to tell someone else they're wrong without even knowing what they believe and why.
No offence, I don't care what you believe. The bits I could glean from your confused utterances so far are more than enough to show me that you seem to wave away the millennium, and Rapture, and also relish sticking the Bride of Christ in the awful wrath of God. So when you refuse to clarify your set of doctrines, it is no biggie. Really.
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,078
3,472
USA
Visit site
✟225,378.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Either the wrath of God in the Tribulation is part of the wrath of God that culminates at His return or not. The bible days that the plagues of that time indeed are the wrath of God. You are overruled.

Stop avoiding the obvious. Numerous posts, questions and Scriptures have been avoided by you. This reveals the fragility of your position. Where is your so-called rapture and 7-year tribulation in Revelation? Where is your 3rd coming? It is obvious why you are avoiding.
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,610
2,867
MI
✟442,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No offence, I don't care what you believe.
Let me clue you in on something as well. I don't care what you believe, either. But I do care if you lead others to believe the same false doctrine that you believe in and that's why I show the falsehood in your doctrine.

The bits I could glean from your confused utterances so far are more than enough to show me that you seem to wave away the millennium, and Rapture, and also relish sticking the Bride of Christ in the awful wrath of God. So when you refuse to clarify your set of doctrines, it is no biggie. Really.
I have clarified what I believe. I don't wave away the millennium at all. Ask any other Premil here if I do that and they will tell you that I do not. They know that I simply intepret the thousand years differently than them, but I do not wave it away at all. Nor do I just wave away the Rapture. Nor do I have the bride of Christ suffering God's wrath. You have nothing but false accusations. Your trouble with reading comprehension is the real problem here.

What is very clear to anyone reading this thread is that you have no ability whatsoever to back up your claims with scripture. You've been asked to do so many times and you continue to do nothing but spew your opinions left and right without backing them up with scripture.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

power1

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2021
721
127
canada
Visit site
✟32,782.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Those descriptions are within passages regarding the eternal new heavens and new earth.
Looking at those chapters it does seem a little too much for this thread. The child is mentioned after the new earth is mentioned in Isa 65. At first appearances it would look like that was chronological, but when comparing other prophesies, and bible passages, I would lean toward that applying to the 1000 years. Why? Because there is no death in the new heaven and earth.

In any case, the following passage is clearly speaking of the period just after Jesus returns.

Zechariah 14:2
I will gather all the nations to Jerusalem to fight against it; the city will be captured, the houses ransacked, and the women raped. Half of the city will go into exile, but the rest of the people will not be taken from the city.
Zechariah 14:3
Then the Lord will go out and fight against those nations, as he fights on a day of battle.
Zechariah 14:4
On that day his feet will stand on the Mount of Olives, east of Jerusalem, and the Mount of Olives will be split in two from east to west, forming a great valley, with half of the mountain moving north and half moving south.
Zechariah 14:5
You will flee by my mountain valley, for it will extend to Azel. You will flee as you fled from the earthquake in the days of Uzziah king of Judah. Then the Lord my God will come, and all the holy ones with him.
Zechariah 14:6
On that day there will be neither sunlight nor cold, frosty darkness.
Zechariah 14:7
It will be a unique day—a day known only to the Lord —with no distinction between day and night. When evening comes, there will be light.
Zechariah 14:8
On that day living water will flow out from Jerusalem, half of it east to the Dead Sea and half of it west to the Mediterranean Sea, in summer and in winter.
Zechariah 14:9
The Lord will be king over the whole earth. On that day there will be one Lord , and his name the only name.
Zechariah 14:10
The whole land, from Geba to Rimmon, south of Jerusalem, will become like the Arabah. But Jerusalem will be raised up high from the Benjamin Gate to the site of the First Gate, to the Corner Gate, and from the Tower of Hananel to the royal winepresses, and will remain in its place.
Zechariah 14:16
Then the survivors from all the nations that have attacked Jerusalem will go up year after year to worship the King, the Lord Almighty, and to celebrate the Festival of Tabernacles.
Zechariah 14:17
If any of the peoples of the earth do not go up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the Lord Almighty, they will have no rain.
Zechariah 14:18
If the Egyptian people do not go up and take part, they will have no rain. The Lord will bring on them the plague he inflicts on the nations that do not go up to celebrate the Festival of Tabernacles.
Zechariah 14:19
This will be the punishment of Egypt and the punishment of all the nations that do not go up to celebrate the Festival of Tabernacles.
Zechariah 14:20
On that day holy to the Lord will be inscribed on the bells of the horses, and the cooking pots in the Lord 's house will be like the sacred bowls in front of the altar.

There are survivors!

There is nothing figurative about it.

Why would you want to interpret a passage like Isaiah 65:17-25 in such a way that contradicts what John said about the new heavens and new earth in Revelation 21:1-4?
Already discussed above.
He very clearly said there will be no more death when the new heavens and new earth are ushered in. Doesn't that make you want to reconsider how you are interpreting Isaiah 65:20?
Let's not get sidetracked on that, since it seems to be somewhat deep.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
The only time when we would need to be taken off of the earth is when the entire earth is burned up when Christ returns (2 Peter 3:10-13). There is nothing anywhere in scripture to indicate that we would need to be taken off of the earth years before that.
That is what the book of Revelation is all about. Revelation shows those who leave this earth during the 42 months given to Satan and the FP, are people who leave earth by being beheaded. No where is a rapture even mentioned. Yet the Lamb appears at the 6th Seal years before this 42 month period, or months. Who can know? Only God knows when He and the Lamb are going to remove all spiritual blindness at the Second Coming. If the Lamb is already seen by all of humanity, it is prior to the 42 months, not after the 42 months. But then again you refuse John's chronology, and make up your own to fit your eschatological bias.

Do you think all will be destroyed immediately or will actually see God before they are decieved, without hope?

"For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, Teaching us that, denying ungodliness and worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present world; Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ; Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works."

Paul claims all will see God, not just the Lamb at the Second Coming. So does John:

"And said to the mountains and rocks, Fall on us, and hide us from the face of him that sitteth on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb: For the great day of his wrath is come; and who shall be able to stand?"

The church teaches the Second Coming is for the church, but that is not the whole picture. At the Second Coming all will see both God on the GWT, and the Lamb. The Trumpets and Thunders are still the wrath of the Lamb and God, not just the 7 vials 42 months later. You all want to lump this event into a few seconds, except there is no 42 month warning for the Second Coming, as many teach. It will be sudden and without warning, and the only sign will be war, and Jesus Christ appearing to rescue Jerusalem, not the church. The church only gets to leave as Christ is coming down to rescue Jerusalem. The church is not in trouble, Israel is. Zechariah 14:2-4

"For I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue of the people shall not be cut off from the city. Then shall the Lord go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle. And his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives, which is before Jerusalem on the east, and the mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south."

Not sure how one can deny this is the Second Coming. Now add 2 Peter 3, to the mix, because Zechariah did not mention the fire, but there is only one Second Coming that is for the church, to rescue Israel, and bring The Lamb and angels to earth for the final harvest. But the heavens will be different:

"And it shall come to pass in that day, that the light shall not be clear, nor dark: But it shall be one day which shall be known to the Lord, not day, nor night: but it shall come to pass, that at evening time it shall be light."

When the heavens are rolled back like a scroll, heaven will change. The works of man will be burned up. The angels will come to earth, symbolized by the stars falling like fig leaves on a windy day. Of course the sky is going to be different after all the stars are on earth instead of in the firmament. But the final harvest is about to happen.

The final harvest is not a secret. It will be going on, on earth, and the whole world will watch it take place. But it is still not the GWT event of Revelation 20, because there is no Jerusalem to protect at the GWT, appearing sans heaven and earth. Only the dead dead appear at the GWT. At the Second Coming the living dead will still be on earth. The angels still have to carry out the final harvest, even before Satan and the FP get their 42 months, and "saints" on earth are beheaded. Ironically, they are only saints after their physical resurrection.

How can this symbolize the rapture or Second Coming:

"Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. And I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Write, Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord from henceforth: Yea, saith the Spirit, that they may rest from their labours; and their works do follow them. And I looked, and behold a white cloud, and upon the cloud one sat like unto the Son of man, having on his head a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle."

There is no rapture nor Second Coming inferred in these verses. So they have to physically die to be Blessed. Sound familiar?

"And I saw as it were a sea of glass mingled with fire: and them that had gotten the victory over the beast, and over his image, and over his mark, and over the number of his name, stand on the sea of glass, having the harps of God. And they sing the song of Moses the servant of God, and the song of the Lamb, saying, Great and marvellous are thy works, Lord God Almighty; just and true are thy ways, thou King of saints."

How did these saints overcome?

"And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them (the church), and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded (saints on earth during the 42 months) for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years."

We were not even told they were beheaded until after the fact. But the only way they overcame was to be beheaded. How is this symbolic of a rapture and Second Coming event? It is not symbolic of 30AD, where you place these beheaded people who reign throughout your understanding of this 1000 year reign of Christ. They died after the Second Coming. Yet you claim they were resurrected in the first century. Your recap starts when Satan was bound, just prior to these beheaded saints being resurrected in the first century. The only way we know these people were beheaded because they refused to take the mark and worship the beast is in the middle of this chapter you claim starts in the first century. No other verse in Revelation points out these saints were even beheaded. They were resurrected 1000 years prior to this event:

"And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison, And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea. And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city."

How can you interpret these verses to show a resurrection did not happen 1000 years prior to Satan loosed to decieve these saints who were resurrected 1000 years earlier? Other than John the Baptist, who else was beheaded, who sang the song of Moses, and after the Second Coming. These beheaded resurrected saints were after Jesus reaped the final harvest. Remember: Revelation 14, just prior to the winepress event?

"And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name. Here is the patience of the saints: here are they that keep the commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus. And I heard a voice from heaven saying unto me, Write, Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord from henceforth."

Henceforth from the Cross, or Henceforth from the Second Coming?
 
Upvote 0

power1

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2021
721
127
canada
Visit site
✟32,782.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You're just making a fool of yourself with comments like this. No one here, including me, would try to claim that Satan's little season doesn't refer to a real period of time that will occur.
Then be clear. When people are waving away 1000 years, and offering all sorts of contorted and convoluted suggestions it is appropriate that they are clear on basic points. Especially when they conflate things in the Trib, return of Christ, and the end of the 1000 years. Satan is cast to earth in the Trib for a little while. So when you refer to some little period he is allowed to do his thing on earth, be clear.
 
Upvote 0

Timtofly

Well-Known Member
Jun 29, 2020
9,417
575
58
Mount Morris
✟148,028.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Therefore the correct way to rightly divide Rev 20 is to see the first resurrection as Jesus own resurrection..., and those who partake of it not coming into judgment and escaping the second death.., as Jn 5 teaches.
Jesus was beheaded?

"and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years."
 
Upvote 0

power1

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2021
721
127
canada
Visit site
✟32,782.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Matthew 25:31-46 makes it quite clear that the unsaved will be judged when Christ returns. So, why do you not have them being judged until 1000+ years later?
The dead are raised after the 1000 years. Why imply otherwise?
Can you tell me how you interpret this passage:

Matthew 13:47 “Once again, the kingdom of heaven is like a net that was let down into the lake and caught all kinds of fish. 48 When it was full, the fishermen pulled it up on the shore. Then they sat down and collected the good fish in baskets, but threw the bad away. 49 This is how it will be at the end of the age. The angels will come and separate the wicked from the righteous 50 and throw them into the blazing furnace, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

Do you believe that Jesus will return at the end of the age (Matt 24:3)? If so, wasn't He quite clear that both the righteous and the wicked will be judged at that time?
I do not interpret that as meaning the dead are not raised and judged after the 1000 years as the bible says.
 
Upvote 0

power1

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2021
721
127
canada
Visit site
✟32,782.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Stop avoiding the obvious. Numerous posts, questions and Scriptures have been avoided by you. This reveals the fragility of your position. Where is your so-called rapture and 7-year tribulation in Revelation? Where is your 3rd coming? It is obvious why you are avoiding.
When you avoid the issue of how the plagues are the wrath of God you offer no reply, but accuse others of avoiding. Get to it.
 
Upvote 0

power1

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2021
721
127
canada
Visit site
✟32,782.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I have clarified what I believe. I don't wave away the millennium at all.
OK, so you believe in a literal 1000 years reign after He returns?
Ask any other Premil here if I do that and they will tell you that I do not. They know that I simply intepret the thousand years differently than them
What does that mean if you are so clear? Is it actually 1000 years or not? Yes or no?
, but I do not wave it away at all. Nor do I just wave away the Rapture. Nor do I have the bride of Christ suffering God's wrath. You have nothing but false accusations. Your trouble with reading comprehension is the real problem here.
The Rapture I refer to is the one before the return of Jesus to the earth with His saints. Don't think you get to just say the word rapture and have people think you believe in it. Your accusations are what is false. You do the same with the wrath of God in the Tribulation, do you not? You simply use the word wrath and try to make it only apply after! Who did you think you were fooling?
Run along
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,610
2,867
MI
✟442,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Then be clear.
I believe I am being clear. If you're not clear about something that I believe, then just ask instead of making assumptions.

When people are waving away 1000 years,
Who is doing that?

and offering all sorts of contorted and convoluted suggestions it is appropriate that they are clear on basic points.
Do you think you're clear on anything when you don't even support any of your claims with scripture? I don't consider that to be clear.

Especially when they conflate things in the Trib, return of Christ, and the end of the 1000 years. Satan is cast to earth in the Trib for a little while. So when you refer to some little period he is allowed to do his thing on earth, be clear.
In Revelation 20 it's called a "little season" after he is loosed. In Revelation 12, it's says he has a "short time" after being cast out of heaven. So, any reference to his "little season" is a reference to Revelation 20. Why do I need to spell everything out to you?
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,610
2,867
MI
✟442,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The dead are raised after the 1000 years. Why imply otherwise?
I don't. Show me exactly where I ever said otherwise. Both Premils and Amils believe that the dead are raised after the 1000 years (and after Satan's little season), but Amils believe Christ returns after the 1000 years while Premils like yourself believe He returns before the 1000 years. Also, Amils believe that all of the dead, saved and lost, will be raised after the 1000 years, while Premils typically believe that only the unsaved dead will be raised after the 1000 years.

I do not interpret that as meaning the dead are not raised and judged after the 1000 years as the bible says.
Look how you are. I asked you how you interpret Matthew 13:47-50. And this is your response? Should I take this to mean that you don't know how to interpret that passage? If you don't, then just say so. If you do, then please tell me how you interpret it.
 
Upvote 0

power1

Well-Known Member
Oct 18, 2021
721
127
canada
Visit site
✟32,782.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I believe I am being clear. If you're not clear about something that I believe, then just ask instead of making assumptions.

Who is doing that?
You forgot to be clear on whether you believe in an actual 1000 year period that Jesus reigns on earth. What should we assume you believe?


In Revelation 20 it's called a "little season" after he is loosed. In Revelation 12, it's says he has a "short time" after being cast out of heaven. So, any reference to his "little season" is a reference to Revelation 20. Why do I need to spell everything out to you?
Ah, thanks for admitting that you absolutely conflate the end of the seven years with the end of the 1000 years!
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,610
2,867
MI
✟442,188.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You forgot to be clear on whether you believe in an actual 1000 year period that Jesus reigns on earth.
I do not. I believe He reigns at the right hand of the Father in heaven as passages like Ephesians 1:19-22 indicate and I believe that the thousand years is a figurative representation of the New Testament time period that began with the resurrection of Christ. The term "thousand" is used figuratively in scripture a number of times. Here are a couple of examples:

Deuteronomy 7:9 Know therefore that the Lord thy God, he is God, the faithful God, which keepeth covenant and mercy with them that love him and keep his commandments to a thousand generations;

This is clearly not referring to a literal thousand generations. Obviously, there is no limit to the number of generations that God keeps His covenant "with them that love him and keep his commandments".

Psalm 50:10 For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle upon a thousand hills.

Again, this is clearly figurative language being used here. It's not as if only the cattle on a thousand hills belongs to God, but the rest don't.

What should we assume you believe?
You shouldn't assume anything. I've been telling you what I believe all along. I don't think you're paying close enough attention. It might help you if you took a little time to read up on what Amillennialists believe, so you don't have to keep asking me these questions over and over again.

Ah, thanks for admitting that you absolutely conflate the end of the seven years with the end of the 1000 years!
What seven years are you referring to exactly? Show me with scripture.

Also, if you're thinking that I was equating the "short time" of Revelation 12 with the "little season" of Revelation 20, I was not. I do not equate those two. I was just telling you how to tell the difference. The phrases "little season" and "short time" are obviously different, so if someone references Satan's little season they are talking about Revelation 20. Is this too hard for you to understand?
 
Upvote 0

sovereigngrace

Well-Known Member
Dec 9, 2019
9,078
3,472
USA
Visit site
✟225,378.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
When you avoid the issue of how the plagues are the wrath of God you offer no reply, but accuse others of avoiding. Get to it.

How do you think that your failure to present the basics of your doctrine advances your cause or looks to all watching on? The burden of proof is with you. Amils have presented numerous passages to prove a general resurrection/judgment when Jesus comes, a climactic event, the ushering in of perfection. You have presented nothing apart from your opinion and a dubious website that avoids these issues like you.

God has always protected His children and maintained a witness.

· God did not destroy His elect when the flood came. He preserved them in an ark.
· God did not destroy a lot when he punished Sodom. He delivered him to a safe place and then destroy the wicked.
· God did not let Moses Israel’s deliver be destroyed in Egypt. He preserved him in a little ark.
· He did not leave the children of Israel unprotected in Egypt. He sheltered them and delivered them at the right time.
· He did not rescue Shadrach Meshach and Abednego from awful persecution. He preserved Shadrach Meshach and Abednego in the fiery furnace.
· He did not rescue Daniel from unrighteous persecution. He preserved him in the lion’s den.
 
Upvote 0