Age of the earth isn’t 4.6 Billion years

[chad kincham]

I’ve known for a long time that secular science calculations of the recession rate of the moons orbit, shows that the earth cannot be older than 1.5 billion years.

And very recently I saw an article where scientist now say that the earths core can’t be older than 1.5 billion years.

The earth is still much younger than 1.5 billion years, but it’s interesting that there are two groups of scientists saying that the earth is over 3 billion years younger than paleontology and geology claims.

 

[Aussie Pete]

I’ve known for a long time that secular science calculations of the recession rate of the moons orbit, shows that the earth cannot be older than 1.5 billion years.

And very recently I saw an article where scientist now say that the earths core can’t be older than 1.5 billion years.

The earth is still much younger than 1.5 billion years, but it’s interesting that there are two groups of scientists saying that the earth is over 3 billion years younger than paleontology and geology claims.

Science is the pursuit of knowledge apart from God. It was not always that way. Some of the pioneers were sincere Christians who saw God's hand in everything. I don't why it even matters how old the earth is, except as an attempt to embarrass Christian who hold to YEC views/ The reality is that no one knows except God. Evolutionists need an ancient earth because they need time for evolution to work. How much time? They don't know either. So the older the better. Evolution is impossible however long they've got, but that's not important. It sounds impressive until you examine it closely.

 

[Lost4words]

I used to believe in an old earth. After some research etc i now believe we are living on a young earth...

 

[SkyWriting]

I’ve known for a long time that secular science calculations of the recession rate of the moons orbit, shows that the earth cannot be older than 1.5 billion years.

And very recently I saw an article where scientist now say that the earths core can’t be older than 1.5 billion years.

The earth is still much younger than 1.5 billion years, but it’s interesting that there are two groups of scientists saying that the earth is over 3 billion years younger than paleontology and geology claims.

A person or group can't "predict" the past any more than they can predict the future.
All past events are matters of faith.

 

[Bobber]

The earth is still much younger than 1.5 billion years, but it’s interesting that there are two groups of scientists saying that the earth is over 3 billion years younger than paleontology and geology claims.

I'd find it humous to see one person believing the earth is 3 billion years get in an fist fight with one who feels the earth is 6 billion years old calling each other names and a list of other thing too.

 

[Mark Quayle]

I'd find it humous to see one person believing the earth is 3 billion years get in an fist fight with one who feels the earth is 6 billion years old calling each other names and a list of other thing too.

Happens over Covid, or over who has the right to the last Cabbage Patch doll in the store.

 

[chad kincham]

I'd find it humous to see one person believing the earth is 3 billion years get in an fist fight with one who feels the earth is 6 billion years old calling each other names and a list of other thing too.

The point is that scientists who don’t get a paycheck from promoting and “researching” evolution, say that the earth is considerably younger than 4.6 BY.

Evolutionists don’t like that, because they require enough “deep time” for the impossible to occur.

 

[chad kincham]

Here’s the deal ladies and gentlemen, a long time before Darwin came along and they started digging up dinosaur bones and reconstructing what they looked like, there have been depictions found all over the world, in artwork and drawings of several types of dinosaurs that are very accurate , and the only way they could have so accurately drawn dinosaurs back then is that they saw them in the flesh..

And not just drawings either, they have pottery depictions of dinosaurs in 3-D that are also extremely accurate.

And Dr. Carl Baugh has excavated dinosaur foot prints from a river bed in Texas with overlays of human foot prints on top of the dinosaur tracks - and diagnostic imaging has shown that compression of the soil took place under those foot prints, from their weight, so they are real and not carved or cast foot prints.

And soft tissue and blood vessels have been found in dinosaur bones that therefore cannot possibly be 80 million years old.

Therefore in addition to the planet not being the required 4.6 BYO for evolution to occur, dinosaurs and man coexisted, and evolution is thus falsified.

 

[Bobber]

Here’s the deal ladies and gentlemen, a long time before Darwin came along and they started digging up dinosaur bones and reconstructing what they looked like, there have been depictions found all over the world, in artwork and drawings of several types of dinosaurs that are very accurate , and the only way they could have so accurately drawn dinosaurs back then is that they saw them in the flesh..

And not just drawings either, they have pottery depictions of dinosaurs in 3-D that are also extremely accurate.

And Dr. Carl Baugh has excavated dinosaur foot prints from a river bed in Texas with overlays of human foot prints on top of the dinosaur tracks - and diagnostic imaging has shown that compression of the soil took place under those foot prints, from their weight, so they are real and not carved or cast foot prints.

And soft tissue and blood vessels have been found in dinosaur bones that therefore cannot possibly be 80 million years old.

Therefore in addition to the planet not being the required 4.6 BYO for evolution to occur, dinosaurs and man coexisted, and evolution is thus falsified.

I've seen his presentation on this years ago....go luck trying to get anyone in the establishment even willing to look at his evidence I mean they won't even look at it. Baugh is wrong in their opinion because they SAY he's wrong.

 

[Job 33:6]

Old Earth Geology Part 3 (Green River Formation)

All are welcome to respond to my post here.

 

[Job 33:6]

I've seen his presentation on this years ago....go luck trying to get anyone in the establishment even willing to look at his evidence I mean they won't even look at it. Baugh is wrong in their opinion because they SAY he's wrong.

What's interesting about the alleged human print in or over a dinosaur print is that, ya know, I look at rocks probably a couple times a week. I've never seen anything like what was claimed. But the pictures of it that I've seen, they look like forged pictures. And of the thousands of dinosaurs we know of, oddly enough the alleged human print is inside a T-Rex print (the most widely known yet rare species). It doesn't appear to be a trackway.

It all just looks fake. And it's not like we can just go out and look at it ourselves because no information on it's location is given.

It's clearly just a forgery. Someone made some junk out of paper mache and just colored to make it look like a stone.

 

[Tom 1]

And not just drawings either, they have pottery depictions of dinosaurs in 3-D that are also extremely accurate.

Where have you come across these drawings and ceramics?

 

[public hermit]

Here’s the deal ladies and gentlemen, a long time before Darwin came along and they started digging up dinosaur bones and reconstructing what they looked like, there have been depictions found all over the world, in artwork and drawings of several types of dinosaurs that are very accurate , and the only way they could have so accurately drawn dinosaurs back then is that they saw them in the flesh

That's really interesting. Can you share some links to these?

 

[Job 33:6]

That's really interesting. Can you share some links to these?

Ancient Dinosaur Depictions | Genesis Park

If you buy into the story, above are some common ones.

I would guess them to be, assuming they are ancient and aren't forgeries, figments of the human imagination. The dinosaur trackway doesn't appear to be anatomically correct, indicating that it likely isn't real. Some sculptures look or or less like dinosaurs than others. Some appear to be sculptures of mythical beasts of folk lore.

 

[chad kincham]

Where have you come across these drawings and ceramics?

Unfortunately I lost that link when my desktop popped out, it had a ton of them from all over the world, however this short video shows a couple of examples:

 

[chad kincham]

That's really interesting. Can you share some links to these?

Here’s one short one with a few examples- I’m still looking for the one I lost when my desktop got too old to boot up anymore, which had tons of them from all over, including a T. rex from Israel:

 

[Tigger45]

I used to believe in an old earth. After some research etc i now believe we are living on a young earth...

That’s what happens when you switch from counting in dog years to human years

 

[Lost4words]

That’s what happens when you switch from counting in dog years to human years

Woof

 

[Job 33:6]

Unfortunately I lost that link when my desktop popped out, it had a ton of them from all over the world, however this short video shows a couple of examples:

One interesting thing to note is that alligators of the Mesozoic are not the same as alligators of today.

Early mesozoic crocodiles looked more like archosaurs.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crocodylomorpha

Late mesozoic crocodiles would grow up to 40 feet long. Which is significantly larger than alligators or crocodiles grow today.

People tend to confuse this. Thinking prehistoric ceolacanths and prehistoric sharks and prehistoric alligators were all the same as they are today. But they're actually unique species.

Megalodon is another example. It is similar to a great white shark, but much much larger.

So people shouldn't confuse prehistory by saying that because crocodiles lived alongside dinosaurs, and we live alongside crocodiles, then it must be true that we lived alongside dinosaurs.

This is something I mentioned to @Derf the other day. The same goes for prehistoric ceolacanths. They actually aren't the same species as ceolacanths of today and are morphologically unique and different in the past (though I would agree that the prehistoric species do resemble those of today).

 

[Lost4words]

Well, i got pics that prove without a shadow of doubt that Corgis today, look identical to the 2 Corgis that were invited onto Noah's Ark!