• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Israel - Vaccination Rate Doesn’t Seem To Impact The Infection Rate

whatbogsends

Senior Veteran
Aug 29, 2003
10,371
8,314
Visit site
✟284,156.00
Faith
Atheist
And the evidence that vaccinated people who aren't limiting social contact are spreading the virus more than unvaccinated people who are social distancing is where?

It's an assessment.

Firstly, to be clear i didn't simply say "unvaccinated people who are social distancing", i specifically talked about limiting social interaction.

With limited social interaction, the capacity for spread is low. You can't infect someone you don't come into contact with.

With high social interaction - specifically indoor venues with large numbers of people - even with vaccines that reduce transmissibility, you have a much higher capacity for spread.

You're free to disagree with that assessment, and your free to cite any evidence you have which contradicts my assessment.

I would argue that my assessment is strengthened by newer information, at least in regards to delta.

"The bottom line was that, in contrast to the other variants, vaccinated people, even if they didn't get sick, got infected and shed virus at similar levels as unvaccinated people who got infected," Dr. Walter Orenstein, who heads the Emory Vaccine Center and who viewed the documents, told CNN.
...
"Vaccines prevent more than 90% of severe disease, but may be less effective at preventing infection or transmission," it reads. "Therefore, more breakthrough and more community spread despite vaccination."

CDC document warns Delta variant appears to spread as easily as chicken pox and cause more severe infection - CNNPolitics
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,848
7,869
65
Massachusetts
✟395,298.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I would argue that my assessment is strengthened by newer information, at least in regards to delta.
The best information I've seen is that 1) those vaccinated with mRNA vaccines have a five-fold reduced risk of infection; 2) when infected have very similar peak viral loads as the unvaccinated; and 3) have high viral loads for a somewhat shorter period of time. Those seem like the relevant facts. What's not known is whether the high nasal viral load in the vaccinated translates into high infectivity.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: whatbogsends
Upvote 0

whatbogsends

Senior Veteran
Aug 29, 2003
10,371
8,314
Visit site
✟284,156.00
Faith
Atheist
The best information I've seen is that 1) those vaccinated with mRNA vaccines have a five-fold reduced risk of infection; 2) when infected have very similar peak viral loads as the unvaccinated; and 3) have high viral loads for a somewhat shorter period of time. Those seem like the relevant facts. What's not known is whether the high nasal viral load in the vaccinated translates into high infectivity.

Do you have a source for this? Better information is always useful.
 
Upvote 0

FireDragon76

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 30, 2013
33,560
20,860
Orlando, Florida
✟1,525,105.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
The best information I've seen is that 1) those vaccinated with mRNA vaccines have a five-fold reduced risk of infection; 2) when infected have very similar peak viral loads as the unvaccinated; and 3) have high viral loads for a somewhat shorter period of time. Those seem like the relevant facts. What's not known is whether the high nasal viral load in the vaccinated translates into high infectivity.

Breakouts in New England where there were a high percentage of people vaccinated suggest the answer is "yes".
 
Upvote 0

sfs

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2003
10,848
7,869
65
Massachusetts
✟395,298.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Breakouts in New England where there were a high percentage of people vaccinated suggest the answer is "yes".
There's no firm evidence from the Provincetown outbreak that the transmission was from vaccinated people, although it seems likely. But as I noted in the thread on the CDC report, conditions there were ideal for transmission, so it's hard to tell at this point whether vaccinated people were highly contagious or not. We don't even know whether the outbreak was driven primarily by one superspreading event or by lots of smaller scale transmission. But we're working on it.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: FireDragon76
Upvote 0