Deflection. I claimed that men are faillible, and you argued with me. That's proof enough.
You accused me of being argumentative - I'm just showing that you are argumentative enough even to paint yourself into a corner.
I don't even know what that statement means to you. For one thing, "the absolute witness of God" doesn't render men infallible, so I don't get your point. Is this more gibberish?
I have tried to explain three times - and you keep diverting.
Let the reader decide...
My last statement, that I have consistently expressed, is that while on the one hand men are fallible that does not excuse them from God's judgement, because God brings conviction despite our fallibility.
I quote Romans 1 one more time...
18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of people who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because
that which is known about God is evident within them; for God made it evident to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, that is, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, being understood by what has been made, so that they are without excuse. 21 For even though they knew God, they did not honor Him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their reasonings, and their senseless hearts were darkened. 22 Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23 and they exchanged the glory of the incorruptible God for an image in the form of corruptible mankind, of birds, four-footed animals, and crawling creatures.
Let the scripture speak for itself...
The arguments of man are like chaff.
Have a great day.
