Amazon Quietly Bans Books Containing Undefined ‘Hate Speech’

[rambot]

But no mention of the left's 'concerns, correct?
Liberal Mother Jones blogger Kate Sheppard wrote that environmentalists were “having a (rather justified) heart attack about the fact that ‘The Lorax’ is now being used to cross-promote a new SUV.” Mazda was using the movie to sell the new Seussified CX-5. One commercial featured a cartoon version of this SUV driving through a grove of Truffula trees. “The ads claim that the car is ‘Truffula tree friendly’ whatever that is supposed to mean,” she complained.

The film, she wrote, “includes a musical number … about how capitalism is awesome and everyone needs a Thneed,”

Honestly, I don't even know what this complaint is even about or in relation to. The reason I brought up the movie the Lorax is because some right wing talking heads had problems him writing the story (and a movie being made), and "indoctrinating our kids with environmentalism" (paraphrased). But the right wing wants to protect the "indoctrination of kids with racist messages".

Uhhhhh,.....Uproxx????????......who 'dat?

Well do you know Lou Dobbs and Bill O'Reilly are?

 

[cow451]

"These companies" are the ones who go along with the leftist government propaganda. Those that don't follow in those same footsteps aren't even allowed to be open. That's one way the government can violate the constitution--by mandating businesses to do it in order to stay in business.

And which government agency is making Amazon ban books, promote government leftist propaganda?

 

[cow451]

It wouldn't take much for them to ban the bible:

"Male and Female, He created them" is not LGBT friendly.
"No one comes to the Father but by Me" is not inclusive.
"He who believes not is condemned already" is inflammatory.

As inflammatory as your post, LOL?

 

[rambot]

"Their concern" isn't what got Dr. Seuss books banned.

That's true becuaes they're not banned.

solid point

 

[rambot]

It wouldn't take much for them to ban the bible:

"Male and Female, He created them" is not LGBT friendly.
"No one comes to the Father but by Me" is not inclusive.
"He who believes not is condemned already" is inflammatory.

Fair point.

It's almost like all your paranoia is for naught.

 

[cow451]

It would explain why he would be so willing to go along with the leftist government's actions.

Which leftist government actions?

 

[cow451]

Teletubbies.

Yes. Teletubbies. The purple one was the worst as I recall.

 

[Ringo84]

Citations on that perhaps?

Ringo

 

[Aldebaran]

Fair point.

It's almost like all your paranoia is for naught.

Give it time: Atheist intends to criminalise Bible if Scot hate crime Bill is passed

 

[rambot]

Give it time: Atheist intends to criminalise Bible if Scot hate crime Bill is passed

I remember that AbSOLUTELY ridiculous article that utterly and completely misrepresents what's going on. I mean, you didn't even read your own article man.

Put some effort in would you?

 

[Aldebaran]

I remember that AbSOLUTELY ridiculous article that utterly and completely misrepresents what's going on. I mean, you didn't even read your own article man.

Put some effort in would you?

I put in as much effort as I see from those I have conversations with.

 

[SilverBear]

Yes. Teletubbies. The purple one was the worst as I recall.

was that the one Jerry Falwell claimed was homosexual?

 

[RDKirk]

.....and where/when did he suggest any such thing?

They are claiming he did. Ask them.

 

[RDKirk]

It doesn't surprise me that anarchists such as BLM infiltrators would say such a thing.

The ones in court are claiming he did. Are you saying the people arrested have really been BLM infiltrators?

 

[Aldebaran]

The ones in court are claiming he did. Are you saying the people arrested have really been BLM infiltrators?

And looking to blame someone else for their own actions? Yes.

 

[Strathos]

And looking to blame someone else for their own actions? Yes.

Conspiracy forum is that-a-way.

 

[Aldebaran]

Conspiracy forum is that-a-way.

I'm not the people claiming in court that I committed a crime because the president of the United States told me to.

 

[Strathos]

I'm not the people claiming in court that I committed a crime because the president of the United States told me to.

So I guess all of their history, social media posts on right-wing websites, and promotion of right-wing, pro-Trump politics to their families and friends, lasting for years in many cases, were all just a coverup, right?

 

[RDKirk]

And looking to blame someone else for their own actions? Yes.

And this is why I speak of American Christian right-wingers being under a great spiritual delusion.

 

[Aldebaran]

So I guess all of their history, social media posts on right-wing websites, and promotion of right-wing, pro-Trump politics to their families and friends, lasting for years in many cases, were all just a coverup, right?

You made a lot of assertions there without a single citation, so it's not only a strawman, but an invisible one.