Okay then.
Seriously? You seriously have problems.
Woah, that's a drastic over-reaction, isn't it? I asked a simple question, and for some reason you accuse me of having problems.
Why is it that you react so aggressively when I ask if your husband, who has formal qualifications in a relevant field, accepts evolution as correct?
That is not true.
You said: You claim it doesn't explain the fact that cells contain information, despite the fact that it does. If you understood evolution you'd understand that fact.
Right there in plain text you claim it is a fact. You answered when I asked how information came about: Evolution.
Except that's not what we were talking about.
If we take the relevant parts of our conversation, it would go like this:
Kylie: I think you've discounted evolution because you don't understand it.
Once: Totally false.
Kylie: Hence why I said it was my thoughts and I didn't state it as an absolute fact.
So please don't misrepresent what I've said, okay?
So you were not clear on what I meant but whatever I meant Evolution was the answer.
No.
You meant one thing, but I interpreted what you meant as something else, and the answer to what I believed you were asking was evolution.
No, you claimed it was the way it happened. No question. In fact you said: You told me why you assumed my answers were incorrect, but since you apparently don't have any qualifications, you don't seem capable of recognising the answers when they are given to you.
No, I never stated that my enzyme thing was DEFINiTELY the way it got started. In fact, given that I used the made up name Abcase for this hypothetical enzyme because it works on molecules A, B and C, I think it's quite clear that I'm using it as a hypothetical example.
So not only did you 'think' the answer was fact, you an unqualified, uneducated person as yourself made the claim that I didn't have qualifications (as though you did) and was incapable of recognizing the answers "when they are given to me". Like I said, you are rude, arrogant and you feel you are superior to Christians.
And since the enzyme example was not something I came up with myself, but was actually presented by an actual biologist who studies evolution for a living, I think it's a perfectly valid hypothesis.
Now how do you arrive at that?
If I know exactly what the finished version is going to be, and I have the capacity to produce the finished version right from the start, why would I waste time making prototypes?
