- Jul 8, 2019
- 3,657
- 893
- 56
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
I am not skirting your questions when I say I don't know.I was asking you for counter evidence that supports your position of only believing something if it has sufficient evidence...that by reading my post would assure you that I was saying if I am right in assuming your honesty, you would be inclined to answer my questions.
What information? DNA?Information. I have repeated that several times.
I agree but I would like you to explain your criteria for concluding that. Why would you conclude an intelligent being wrote that?Is it subjective? If you were to go to the beach and in the sand near a low lying tree there were scratches in the sand. Subjectively, it could be someone playing with a branch, scratching around or it could be the tree itself making the marks by the wind. However, if we go to the beach and there in the sand is a message, "George was here". Now do we think this was made by a branch blowing in the wind or do we think someone named George was writing in the sand? We would be correct in concluding that an intelligent being wrote in the sand.
Upvote
0