No, Pliny the Elder.
Gaius Plinius Secundus (AD 23/24–79), called Pliny the Elder (
/ˈplɪni/), was a
Roman author, a
naturalist and
natural philosopher, a naval and army commander of the early
Roman Empire, and a friend of emperor
Vespasian. He wrote the encyclopedic
Naturalis Historia (Natural History), which became an editorial model for
encyclopedias. He spent most of his spare time studying, writing, and investigating natural and geographic phenomena in the field.
His son was Pliny the younger.
So we have Jesus who claimed to be God and was crucified and the disciples in hiding and denying even knowing Christ, who then after the acclaimed resurrection coming out in boldness and defiance to spread the gospel. Not evidence but if one takes human nature into account this seems more in line with a truth being told than not. IMHO.
The laws of Logic are not how things behave, but are of the mind. It stands to reason that laws concerning mind and logic are of the mind and are not physical in nature. It seems to me that it would be of great importance when determining whether or not God does indeed exist, that one would consider something so essential to human existence as the mind and the Laws that allow us to intelligently discern the world around us. Does knowing something has a natural process and can be tested determine its supernatural-ness? What if those miracles were a result of timelessness or perhaps other dimensional reality?
So you said. However, nothing in your post about you losing your faith really said anything about what in your education and study led to your loss of faith. Considering what you have posted, and that is really all I have to go on, you studied atheist argumentation as most of your arguments seem to be intiated from that school of thought.