OK.....
Questioner: Good evening. Human population growth has more than doubled in the past 50 years. The planet cannot sustain this growth. I realize this is a poisonous topic for politicians, but it’s crucial to face. Empowering women and educating everyone on the need to curb population growth seems a reasonable campaign to enact. Would you be courageous enough to discuss this issue and make it a key feature of a plan to address climate catastrophe?
SANDERS: Well, Martha, the answer is yes. And the answer has everything to do with the fact that women in the United States of America, by the way, have a right to control their own bodies and make reproductive decisions.
And the Mexico City agreement, which denies American aid to those organizations around the world that are — that allow women to have abortions or even get involved in birth control, to me is totally absurd. So I think, especially in poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies, and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, it’s something I very, very strongly support.
>> In short.... Martha makes a claim that has no scientific merit (population growth not sustainable) and without Martha raising the topic of abortion, Sanders does and he laments that the US is not funding abortions in 3rd world countries. Doing so, is something he "strongly supports."
That isn't propaganda, that is Sanders' own words and they are racist because he desires to help prevent global catastrophe by using US tax dollars to specifically fund abortions in 3rd world nations, pretty much all of which are filled with minorities.