The Tories are now set on no deal, and in case off future governments wanting to rejoin they are aiming to make it as acrimonious as possible. For example the Home Secretary has just declared that post 31oct this year any eu national without proven settled status will be treated as any other illegal immigrant, detained and deported.Why would the EU compromise? It's the UK who wanted to leave. They are just trying to get the benefits of EU membership without the obligations of said membership.
My understanding is that immigration was a big factor in the UK voting for Brexit.The Tories are now set on no deal, and in case off future governments wanting to rejoin they are aiming to make it as acrimonious as possible. For example the Home Secretary has just declared that post 31oct this year any eu national without proven settled status will be treated as any other illegal immigrant, detained and deported.
Yes, and I’m sure we will appreciate 80 year old English pensioners in Spain treated the same wayMy understanding is that immigration was a big factor in the UK voting for Brexit.
My understanding is that immigration was a big factor in the UK voting for Brexit.
well..if you consider a breakup that could lead to bombings and killings as just "messy" then, okay.Well I remember an old song called Breaking Up is Hard to Do. Divorce is often messy but also sometimes for the best of both parties. Perhaps this separation will turn out to be that?
Seems unlikely. We've already haemorrhaged $bns in costs and lost trade, and around 250,000 jobs, and counting. Probable outcomes include Scotland and (later) NI departing the UK, England entering into a kind of vaguely respectable but sad vassal role (like an old butler reduced to begging from tourists outside Buckingham palace) on the international stage followed by a gradual decline into the same kind of nostalgic mental dotage fueling the Tory leadership. The very wealthy will remain unaffected but it'll be pants for anyone else. And we'll have no barrier against the strange stuff you call food in the US and the even stranger notion of paying more for less healthcare. I'm just glad I don't live there anymore.
Oh, that's rich coming from the land of spotted dick in a can, black pudding, and $100 all-you-can-eat cucumber sandwich "teas".
I'm hardly an apologist for America's culinary predilections, but c'mon.
Hey, don’t get your crusts in a twist. And that’s a classic school dinner pudding you’re having a go at there. Just pointing out the predilection to stuff various kinds of refined sugar into just about anything (bread? Peanut butter? Why?), and the comparatively low standards of the meat production industry. Nothing to gain from taking a low bottom end and dragging it down further.
Hey, at least our processed meats only use blood and suet (and sawdust) as filler, not base ingredients.
Now may I offer you a prairie oyster?Oh, that's rich coming from the land of spotted dick in a can, black pudding, and $100 all-you-can-eat cucumber sandwich "teas".
I'm hardly an apologist for America's culinary predilections, but c'mon.
Now may I offer you a prairie oyster?
well..if you consider a breakup that could lead to bombings and killings as just "messy" then, okay.
https://www.vox.com/world/2019/2/18/18204269/brexit-irish-border-backstop-explained
tulc(which is a possible outcome of the hard border issue in Ireland)
If bombing and killings are what the Irish decide to do it is on them not on anyone or anything else. AFAIK Brexit was democratically arrived at so I think no one that is a non citizen of the UK has any business telling the people of the UK that they ought to think differently and deny themselves the right to make their own decisions in order to please those that disagree with those decisions
In the event of any bombings, were that to occur, it wouldn't matter who it is 'on'. That's not a helpful perspective. The concerns about a hard border in Ireland aren't simply about any actual violence that might occur as a result, at this point that is an unknown. The problem the EU negotiators, and a lot of other people, have with Boris Johnson's proposal is that he simply has no plan whatsoever for managing a post Brexit scenario. Saying that the technology to manage it somehow might exist in the future isn't a plan. Would you enter into a partnership with someone who assured you that he would uphold his share of responsibities only when or if it became possible for him to do so some time in the future? There's a simple, basic reality here that really isn't difficult to see: politicians like Boris and his mates simply say things that get people to vote for them. The truth or otherwise of those statements is utterly irrelevant.
Please note that the people of Northern Ireland are British citizens, as are the people of Scotland. 17m votes out of around 70m people is not what you could call a majority, even if you take off the non-voting population.
At the end of the day you are free to think what you like about it, imagination is a wonderful thing, but an alternative is to actually find things out.
By hard boarder they wil split north and south Ireland?