• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

☦Marius☦

Murican
Site Supporter
Jun 9, 2017
2,300
2,102
28
North Carolina (Charlotte)
✟290,623.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
That's how you'd like to see it.

For it would make you feel easily justified in not having to budge.

Everyone who disagrees with me is not proud.

I have been corrected over the years, and appreciated it.

If you are claiming that everyone not in your church is guilty of pride because they aren't humble enough to see how right you are, then you are setting yourself up as the standard of truth.

I converted to Orthodoxy from the Baptist evangelical faith. I went to seminary as a baptist and saw all the problems infesting evangelical theology. One humble Orthodox priest managed to satisfy questions I had agonized years over, that even protestant theology professors had no answer to. And after studying the faith 3 years sceptically before converting, I could find no fault in it. And for 2000 years the Orthodox church has had a consistant stream of miracle workers, divine interventions in the style of the old testament, and a host of martyrs as its witness. Yet the Orthodox I know who are faithful and pious (I don't count myself among them), are still the most humble humans I've ever met in my life. The fruits are dripping from their lives. In all my life as a Baptist I never saw one percent of that kind of peaceful holiness anywhere. Not in missionaries, not in pastors, not in theologians. That is the foundation of Orthodox Truth for me. And it has nothing to do with me. I have no involvement in that truth because it was set millennia ago. And that brings humity.
 
Upvote 0

His student

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,235
555
79
Northwest
✟56,102.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It's not that we believe a person has to earn their salvation.............
No one comes right out and says that of course. But when you completely leave out the fact that we are "saved" in the first place and proceed to the sanctification phase without "passing go" that's exactly what it amounts to for those who value their "saved" status and preaching the evangel to others so they can be saved as well and can rightly be called brothers. It's hard, and probably wrong, to call someone brother who obviously doesn't claim to be "saved" at the present time.
........, it's that we don't believe I once saved always saved. So therefore we would say we are being saved actively rather theb just saying we are saved.
Lots of evangelicals don't believe in once saved always saved (wrongly in my saved and sealed by the Holy Spirit opinion:)).

But that has no bearing on giving the gospel message to people who have never been saved in the first place and getting them saved so they can start the journey.
But there is certainly a journey, a race we must run.
I agree.

But the journey must be run in the power of the Holy Spirit doing works of God through His indwelling power or a person is running in vain and will find himself at the finish line hearing the words "I never knew you".

To run in that power requires that there be a time when you believed the gospel and were saved and sealed with that Holy Spirit. That's why we preach the gospel to the unsaved world and to those we suspect may not be saved simply because they will not claim to be saved - but only that they are running a race to be saved at the end.

Regarding the idea of bishops and popes and such needing to hear the gospel and start the race over again from square one - I'll tell you of an incident from the past.

When I was involved in a charismatic church many years ago a person told me that Pope John Paul was "spirit filled" because he spoke in tongue. Oh - this pope is clearly "saved" they said.

My reply was that it was presumptuous and probably wrong to claim something for a person which he doesn't claim for himself. Like many others in that group John Paul would never claim to be saved. He would only lay claim to be "being" saved. To claim that he was saved at a certain point in time (as evangelicals do) and that his religious activities like traditions and the sacraments were post salvation would be in violation of all the activities his church stood for and required in order to be saved in the end.

Bottom line is that you don't have to believe in OSAS to believe that there is a square one that must be stopped at and past before you can go on to square two.

If a traditional sacramental organized religion type agrees on that, has done that, and teaches that we have no problem. I would have no reason to preach the gospel to such a person.

If he won't or even doesn't I'll give him an invite to be born again just in case.
 
Upvote 0

Not David

Antiochian Orthodox
Apr 6, 2018
7,393
5,278
26
USA
✟243,137.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
No one comes right out and says that of course. But when you completely leave out the fact that we are "saved" in the first place and proceed to the sanctification phase without "passing go" that's exactly what it amounts to for those who value their "saved" status and preaching the evangel to others so they can be saved as well and can rightly be called brothers. It's hard, and probably wrong, to call someone brother who obviously doesn't claim to be "saved" at the present time.

Lots of evangelicals don't believe in once saved always saved (wrongly in my saved and sealed by the Holy Spirit opinion:)).

But that has no bearing on giving the gospel message to people who have never been saved in the first place and getting them saved so they can start the journey.
I agree.

But the journey must be run in the power of the Holy Spirit doing works of God through His indwelling power or a person is running in vain and will find himself at the finish line hearing the words "I never knew you".

To run in that power requires that there be a time when you believed the gospel and were saved and sealed with that Holy Spirit. That's why we preach the gospel to the unsaved world and to those we suspect may not be saved simply because they will not claim to be saved - but only that they are running a race to be saved at the end.

Regarding the idea of bishops and popes and such needing to hear the gospel and start the race over again from square one - I'll tell you of an incident from the past.

When I was involved in a charismatic church many years ago a person told me that Pope John Paul was "spirit filled" because he spoke in tongue. Oh - this pope is clearly "saved" they said.

My reply was that it was presumptuous and probably wrong to claim something for a person which he doesn't claim for himself. Like many others in that group John Paul would never claim to be saved. He would only lay claim to be "being" saved. To claim that he was saved at a certain point in time (as evangelicals do) and that his religious activities like traditions and the sacraments were post salvation would be in violation of all the activities his church stood for and required in order to be saved in the end.

Bottom line is that you don't have to believe in OSAS to believe that there is a square one that must be stopped at and past before you can go on to square two.

If a traditional sacramental organized religion type agrees on that, has done that, and teaches that we have no problem. I would have no reason to preach the gospel to such a person.

If he won't or even doesn't I'll give him an invite to be born again just in case.
Same, I would invite you to be born again through the Church founded by the Lord Jesus Christ.
 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,897
14,168
✟458,328.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
If Orthodox of any type teach a 'works-based' salvation, then why is it I can very easily find things like this Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo mezmur (paraliturgical song) in English that states very clearly "I am redeemed, I am saved, not by my works, but by Your grace"?


We would teach against that if there were a problem with it, but it is nothing less or more than a restatement of the lesson taught in St. Paul's letter to the Ephesians as shown in the video itself. It is not speaking against works so much as saying that to work thinking that by such works you will earn salvation is faulty; it is vanity, as the song puts it. We do not fast, for instance, because fasting is our 'ticket' to heaven, but because it is cooperation with the Word of God when He told us "When you fast..." (Matthew 6:16, indicating that, yes, His believers would be expected to fast), or "This kind can only come out by prayer and fasting" (Mark 9:29; ditto), etc. And of course it is necessary that we cooperate with God. While salvation may not be earned, the opposite certainly can be by a life of sloth, ignorance, neglect, or open rebellion against the Lord and what He has established. And these practices of the Church, such as the Wednesday/Friday fast, are established in the life of the first century community as testified to in the Didache, which is literally the earliest such manual we have. So who is really following what? Again, the faith of the Church is both Biblical and pre-Biblical, and this proves it, and anyone who should read anything else that justifies their neglect of what rule has been established for them is certainly reading into the scriptures what satisfies them, not what pleases God.

And that is only one small example! (Read: The point is not to harangue people into fasting or chastise those who do not, but to show that it is acceptable and indeed mandated from the earliest times that we do things in accordance with what we have been told to do by God, not because by such things we will merit anything of ourselves, but because the process of being saved -- and it is a process, not a state -- is precisely this constant cooperation with God, refining us in humility by active participation in Him, and through this becoming more and more "partakers of the Divine nature.")
 
Upvote 0

☦Marius☦

Murican
Site Supporter
Jun 9, 2017
2,300
2,102
28
North Carolina (Charlotte)
✟290,623.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
No one comes right out and says that of course. But when you completely leave out the fact that we are "saved" in the first place and proceed to the sanctification phase without "passing go" that's exactly what it amounts to for those who value their "saved" status and preaching the evangel to others so they can be saved as well and can rightly be called brothers. It's hard, and probably wrong, to call someone brother who obviously doesn't claim to be "saved" at the present time.

Lots of evangelicals don't believe in once saved always saved (wrongly in my saved and sealed by the Holy Spirit opinion:)).

But that has no bearing on giving the gospel message to people who have never been saved in the first place and getting them saved so they can start the journey.
I agree.

But the journey must be run in the power of the Holy Spirit doing works of God through His indwelling power or a person is running in vain and will find himself at the finish line hearing the words "I never knew you".

To run in that power requires that there be a time when you believed the gospel and were saved and sealed with that Holy Spirit. That's why we preach the gospel to the unsaved world and to those we suspect may not be saved simply because they will not claim to be saved - but only that they are running a race to be saved at the end.

Regarding the idea of bishops and popes and such needing to hear the gospel and start the race over again from square one - I'll tell you of an incident from the past.

When I was involved in a charismatic church many years ago a person told me that Pope John Paul was "spirit filled" because he spoke in tongue. Oh - this pope is clearly "saved" they said.

My reply was that it was presumptuous and probably wrong to claim something for a person which he doesn't claim for himself. Like many others in that group John Paul would never claim to be saved. He would only lay claim to be "being" saved. To claim that he was saved at a certain point in time (as evangelicals do) and that his religious activities like traditions and the sacraments were post salvation would be in violation of all the activities his church stood for and required in order to be saved in the end.

Bottom line is that you don't have to believe in OSAS to believe that there is a square one that must be stopped at and past before you can go on to square two.

If a traditional sacramental organized religion type agrees on that, has done that, and teaches that we have no problem. I would have no reason to preach the gospel to such a person.

If he won't or even doesn't I'll give him an invite to be born again just in case.

I don't recall the scriptural verse that claims saying "I'm saved" , or believing yourself to be saved is required for salvation. If there is could you provide it?

"If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believe in your heart that he arose from the dead then you will be saved"

These are active commands. You confess and believe every day. It is an ongoing thing.
 
Upvote 0

His student

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,235
555
79
Northwest
✟56,102.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Same, I would invite you to be born again through the Church founded by the Lord Jesus Christ.
Great - and if we could part with you that very day agreeing that I was now saved and seated with Christ in the heavenlies having been sealed with his Spirit against the final judgment and would never again come into condemnation having passed from death to life - I would thank you for sharing what you felt I needed.

That would be so even if I had believed I was saved before sitting down to talk with you.

But if you were only able to tell me that now I was embarking on a journey where I may be saved in the end and not now - and if you told me that your church was the only true church ---- I'd shake the dust from my feet on the way out the door.

Now - if you turn around and tell me you'd do the same to me after I had given you my message of salvation by grace through faith - I'd say we are involved in completely different religions regardless of us both naming the name of Christ in some way.

What do you think? Care to share what you think about that so I can determine if I am talking to a brother?
 
Upvote 0

☦Marius☦

Murican
Site Supporter
Jun 9, 2017
2,300
2,102
28
North Carolina (Charlotte)
✟290,623.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Great - and if we could part with you that very day agreeing that I was now saved and seated with Christ in the heavenlies having been sealed with his Spirit against the final judgment and would never again come into condemnation having passed from death to life - I would thank you for sharing what you felt I needed.

That would be so even if I had believed I was saved before sitting down to talk with you.

But if you were only able to tell me that now I was embarking on a journey where I may be saved in the end and not now - and if you told me that your church was the only true church ---- I'd shake the dust from my feet on the way out the door.

Now - if you turn around and tell me you'd do the same to me after I had given you my message of salvation by grace through faith - I'd say we are involved in completely different religions regardless of us both naming the name of Christ in some way.

What do you think? Care to share what you think about that so I can determine if I am talking to a brother?

The epistles clearly say it is possible for the believer to fall away. Christ says it as well, and represented it in several parables. So no, I will never say that I am saved because I would essentially be bragging about my own righteousness and claiming I know I will never fall away in the future which is pride. I have faith that I will be saved in the end but that is as far as I go.
 
Upvote 0

His student

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,235
555
79
Northwest
✟56,102.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't recall the scriptural verse that claims saying "I'm saved, or believing yourself to be saved is required for salvation. If there is could you provide it?

"If you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord, and believe in your heart that he arose from the death then you will be saved"
Amazing. Do you in all honesty believe that that verse teaches that if you believe on the Lord and confess Him before men - you will perhaps be saved in the future if you run a good enough race?

No one said there was such a verse. I’ve only said that if you won’t claim that for yourself I would strongly suspect that you were not saved and preach the gospel to you again as I have been doing. I would do that if you were Billy Graham or the pope himself.

The reason for that suspicion is that if we have truly been given the Spirit of God will know that we are saved.

“The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God.” Romans 8:16
 
Upvote 0

His student

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,235
555
79
Northwest
✟56,102.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
..............no, I will never say that I am saved because I would essentially be bragging about my own righteousness and claiming I know I will never fall away in the future which is pride. I have faith that I will be saved in the end but that is as far as I go.
If I wouldn't say that it would mean that I won't say what God says about me.

Perhaps you are so steeped in traditions and teachings other than the scriptures that you don't know or perhaps just not believe what they say about salvation being in the past tense.

You seem to be the embodiment of why I would preach the gospel to a person of your persuasion even if he was an Orthodox priest or from Catholicism even if he was a bishop or the pope.

I sincerely hope that those who are merely hoping to be saved some day will have that supposed faith reckoned to them as righteousness. Time will tell. In the mean time I'll continue to preach the gospel of salvation in the here and now and invite people to enter into all God has for them through direct access to Him through His promised Spirit Who will never leave us or forsake us.
 
Upvote 0

☦Marius☦

Murican
Site Supporter
Jun 9, 2017
2,300
2,102
28
North Carolina (Charlotte)
✟290,623.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Amazing. Do you in all honesty believe that that verse teaches that if you believe on the Lord and confess Him before men - you will perhaps be saved in the future if you run a good enough race?

No one said there was such a verse. I’ve only said that if you won’t claim that for yourself I would strongly suspect that you were not saved and preach the gospel to you again as I have been doing. I would do that if you were Billy Graham or the pope himself.

The reason for that suspicion is that if we have truly been given the Spirit of God will know that we are saved.

“The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God.” Romans 8:16
Literally putting words in my mouth. Confessing Christ as Lord means following his teachings. That is the definition of having a Lord. I said if you do those two things you Will be saved. You added the word maybe Completely changing the meaning of what I am saying.

"Wherefore, my beloved, as ye have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your own salvation with fear and trembling."

If I wouldn't say that it would mean that I won't say what God says about me.

Perhaps you are so steeped in traditions and teachings other than the scriptures that you don't know or perhaps just not believe what they say about salvation being in the past tense.

You seem to be the embodiment of why I would preach the gospel to a person of your persuasion even if he was an Orthodox priest or from Catholicism even if he was a bishop or the pope.

I sincerely hope that those who are merely hoping to be saved some day will have that supposed faith reckoned to them as righteousness. Time will tell. In the mean time I'll continue to preach the gospel of salvation in the here and now and invite people to enter into all God has for them through direct access to Him through His promised Spirit Who will never leave us or forsake us.

You can continue to preach at us all you like, but until you take the time to actually learn what we believe in earnest without your own bias added along with it- then no one will ever listen. Not that any convert like myself would fall back to the false gospel that the evangelical movement teaches. A Gospel of no fruit and no spiritual living required. Of shallow, constantly shifting doctrine that neither satisfied nor encourages. I have been saved by God from the likes of teachings like yours which brought me up and it were all I knew for most of my life.

I have seen things since I came to Orthodoxy, things I never believed possible. But until you step back and listen to others before yourself, learn to stop attacking and assuming your personal interpretation is the standard of truth, then you will forever be overshadowed by the unshakable truth of Orthodoxy. Our Church will live on unchanged until Christ returns whilst the evangelicals will have watered down their beliefs so much that no two can agree with each other. Christ built his church on a rock. It is easy to spot the foundation of sand.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: charsan
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,169
1,377
75
Atlanta
✟109,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The epistles clearly say it is possible for the believer to fall away. Christ says it as well, and represented it in several parables.

Falling away does not mean he loses his salvation from the Lake of Fire. All who believe in Jesus will be in heaven. But, not all who believe will fare well in their life on earth, nor with receiving eternal rewards.

Some will drag on their rebellion against what God's will is for their life to an extent where God will take that believer home before his time.


"If you see any brother commit a sin that does not lead to death,
you should pray and God will give them life. I refer to those whose
sin does not lead to death. There is a sin that leads to death. I am
not saying that you should pray about that."
1 Jn 5:16​


King Saul was a prime example of suffering the sin onto death.



"Because you did not obey the Lord or carry out his fierce wrath
against the Amalekites, the Lord has done this to you today. The
Lord will deliver both Israel and you into the hands of the Philistines,
and tomorrow you and your sons will be with me. The Lord will
also give the army of Israel into the hands of the Philistines.”
1 Sam 28:18-19​


Samuel told King Saul that the next day (when he was to be killed) that Saul would be with him. Saved. But, no eternal rewards. And shame at his evaluation.
 
Upvote 0

charsan

Charismatic Episcopal Church
Jul 12, 2019
2,297
2,115
54
South California
✟62,421.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The lies and nonsense that some Christians have been taught about what is right and wrong, about what it means to be "Biblical", etc., are huge. It can take years to slowly wander out of those lies. It's tough.

I remember those lies and I hate when I see them parroted I reckon. There are so many of those lies spread in this thread and other places here in the forum
 
Upvote 0

charsan

Charismatic Episcopal Church
Jul 12, 2019
2,297
2,115
54
South California
✟62,421.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Not that any convert like myself would fall back to the false gospel that the evangelical movement teaches. A Gospel of no fruit and no spiritual living required. Of shallow, constantly shifting doctrine that neither satisfied nor encourages.

Amen!!!
 
Upvote 0

His student

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2019
1,235
555
79
Northwest
✟56,102.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You added the word maybe Completely changing the meaning of what I am saying.
I see the word "maybe" nowhere in my post. You'd have to point it out to me.

Did you mean when I said "perhaps"? In either case it would simply be echoing what you said when you said you didn't believe in once saved always saved.

If you teach that a person can be saved and perhaps lose that salvation as you have clearly said - then I was simply saying exactly what you teach.
A Gospel of no fruit and no spiritual living required. Of shallow, constantly shifting doctrine that neither satisfied nor encourages.
WOW talk about a blanket condemnation of the lives of those who don't worship as you do.

That simply isn't true by the way.

I take it that you were speaking of Protestantism in general when you talked about shifting doctrine and misspoke when you said the false gospel of the "evangelicals" and their shifting doctrine.
I have been saved by God from the likes of teachings like yours which brought me up and it were all I knew for most of my life.
You have been saved by God from those who teach that there must be a time that one begins his race or the race he is running is no race at all? I doubt that that was God that brought you to believe other than that.
...step back and listen to others before yourself, learn to stop attacking and assuming your personal interpretation is the standard of truth, then you will forever be overshadowed by the unshakable truth of Orthodoxy.
If the "truth of Orthodoxy" is as muddled as your presentation to the effect that there need be no beginning where the Holy Spirit starts His work in a believer and yet the one who was once so saved can lose that salvation (that they never had but was only working toward???) and that involvement with only your flavor of Christianity is the correct one and that preaching the gospel to the world unto a personal reception of it's truth for justification is nonsense and evil - I'll see your supposed truth and raise you one that isn't muddled at all but crystal clear and always has been since Paul talked to the Philippian jailer.
....evangelicals will have watered down their beliefs so much that no two can agree with each other.
You must be talking about Protestants not evangelists. What you say makes no sense at all.

Look - my presentation in other posts as to why I would bother to preach the gospel to a person who was already involved in the Christian religion (perhaps like yourself for instance) was well reasoned, well presented and made complete sense. What is more it is based on actual observation of religious people and their lack of a starting point in a race they claimed to be running as well as scriptures I provided for you.

I showed you scriptures that told of the various tenses for salvation including the present tense and you still insist that the Christian walk only includes step 2 and 3.

That makes no sense at all. You are arguing either just out of pride or perhaps because you yourself have not begun the race you claim to be running.

You obviously think that you have come out from a false view of salvation and have entered a true one. That may be the case depending on what you believed before entering the Orthodox church. I wouldn't know.

But what I have given to you is the truth and what you have presented is a muddle of partial truths and untruths argued from a position of nonsense.

Hopefully someone here will read my scriptures and reasoning and see that where I have been coming from all along is valid and true.

Hopefully someone will see your race running without a beginning for what it is - nonsense.

Whatever the case - it's all been said. You have received God's Word on the matter and I am praying that it will not return to Him without accomplishing what He sent it out through me to accomplish. :wave:
 
Upvote 0

charsan

Charismatic Episcopal Church
Jul 12, 2019
2,297
2,115
54
South California
✟62,421.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
My idea? I quoted Scripture. Did you realize that?


"Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this:
to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself
from being polluted by the world."
Ja 1:27​

That is not Christianity per se. Its religion.

The following is Christianity. (Its not about following rituals and traditions.)

"Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers
will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are the
kind of worshipers the Father seeks. God is spirit, and his
worshipers must worship in the Spirit and in truth.
Jn 4:23-24​

You have your evangelical bias glasses on and of course you quoted, big deal it's still your deal how you think those verses are to be. Am I to quake in my boots because you lot take Scripture completely out of context and use them to your own devices and put your ideas on them?
 
Upvote 0

dzheremi

Coptic Orthodox non-Egyptian
Aug 27, 2014
13,897
14,168
✟458,328.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
As if Christ didn't build any church but yours. We attend fake churches I suppose?

Wait a minute here. He was replying to someone who would presume to evangelize a Christian bishop. What do you think is behind that if not a prejudgment that even though the bishop oversees a church, there must be something lacking in it for salvation such that they need the evangelization of...some guy?

This is not a very sensible criticism of David's post, in that context. "We attend fake churches I suppose?" Not only did he not say that (the thread is not about ecclesiology), but the people who are drawing these kinds of arguments out in this thread are saying things like that, if not explicitly, then implicitly in what they would do in order to 'save' the bishops of Christian churches, and 'advance the understanding' among the laity of those churches, and all of these other euphemisms to avoid coming out and just saying outright that if you are not an Evangelical Protestant (of a very narrow variety, at that), your church is a "fake church"?

Com'on, man...we all know what's going on here.
 
Upvote 0

W2L

Well-Known Member
Jun 26, 2016
20,085
10,988
USA
✟213,593.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Wait a minute here. He was replying to someone who would presume to evangelize a Christian bishop. What do you think is behind that if not a prejudgment that even though the bishop oversees a church, there must be something lacking in it for salvation such that they need the evangelization of...some guy?

This is not a very sensible criticism of David's post, in that context. "We attend fake churches I suppose?" Not only did he not say that (the thread is not about ecclesiology), but the people who are drawing these kinds of arguments out in this thread are saying things like that, if not explicitly, then implicitly in what they would do in order to 'save' the bishops of Christian churches, and 'advance the understanding' among the laity of those churches, and all of these other euphemisms to avoid coming out and just saying outright that if you are not an Evangelical Protestant (of a very narrow variety, at that), your church is a "fake church"?

Com'on, man...we all know what's going on here.
Forgive me, ive heard that line about "my church was founded by Christ" so many times I felt compelled to answer. He said it and I responded. Not much more to it.
 
Upvote 0

☦Marius☦

Murican
Site Supporter
Jun 9, 2017
2,300
2,102
28
North Carolina (Charlotte)
✟290,623.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Falling away does not mean he loses his salvation from the Lake of Fire. All who believe in Jesus will be in heaven. But, not all who believe will fare well in their life on earth, nor with receiving eternal rewards.

Some will drag on their rebellion against what God's will is for their life to an extent where God will take that believer home before his time.


"If you see any brother commit a sin that does not lead to death,
you should pray and God will give them life. I refer to those whose
sin does not lead to death. There is a sin that leads to death. I am
not saying that you should pray about that."
1 Jn 5:16​


King Saul was a prime example of suffering the sin onto death.



"Because you did not obey the Lord or carry out his fierce wrath
against the Amalekites, the Lord has done this to you today. The
Lord will deliver both Israel and you into the hands of the Philistines,
and tomorrow you and your sons will be with me. The Lord will
also give the army of Israel into the hands of the Philistines.”
1 Sam 28:18-19​


Samuel told King Saul that the next day (when he was to be killed) that Saul would be with him. Saved. But, no eternal rewards. And shame at his evaluation.

Philippians 2:12
Consequently, my beloved ones, just as you have always obeyed, not only during my presence but now much more readily during my absence, keep working out your own salvation with fear and trembling.

1 Corinthians 6:9
Or do you not know that unrighteous people will not inherit God’s Kingdom? Do not be misled. Those who are sexually immoral, idolaters,adulterers, men who submit to homosexual acts, men who practice homosexuality, drunkards, revilers, and extortioners will not inherit God’s Kingdom.

Galatians 5:19-21
(speaking to his already baptized flock) Now the works of the flesh are plainly seen, and they are sexual immorality, uncleanness, brazen conduct, hostility, strife, jealousy, fits of anger, dissensions, divisions, sects, wild parties, and things like these. I am forewarning you about these things, the same way I already warned you, that those who practice such things will not inherit God’s Kingdom.

Hebrews 10:26
For if we practice sin willfully after having received the accurate knowledge of the truth, there is no longer any sacrifice for sins left

Hebrews 6:4-6
For as regards those who were once enlightened and who have tasted the heavenly free gift and who have become partakers of holy spirit it is impossible to revive them again to repentance, because they nail the Son of God to the stake again for themselves and expose him to public shame.

2 Peter 2:20-21
Certainly if after escaping from the defilements of the world by an accurate knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, they get involved again with these very things and are overcome, their final state has become worse for them than the first. It would have been better for them not to have accurately known the path of righteousness than after knowing it to turn away from the holy commandment they had received.

John 15:1-6
I am the true vine, and my Father is the cultivator. for apart from me you can do nothing at all. If anyone does not remain in union with me, he is thrown out like a branch and dries up. And men gather those branches and throw them into the fire, and they are burned.

Romans 11:17-22
However, if some of the branches were broken off and you, although being a wild olive, were grafted in among them and became a sharer of the richness of the olive’s root, the branches. If, though, you are arrogant toward them, remember that you do not bear the root, but the root bears you but you are standing by faith. Do not be haughty, but be in fear. and severity. There is severity toward those who fell, but toward you there is God’s kindness, provided you remain in his kindness; otherwise, you too will be lopped off.

If you teach that a person can be saved and perhaps lose that salvation as you have clearly said - then I was simply saying exactly what you teach.
WOW talk about a blanket condemnation of the lives of those who don't worship as you do.

That simply isn't true by the way.

I take it that you were speaking of Protestantism in general when you talked about shifting doctrine and misspoke when you said the false gospel of the "evangelicals" and their shifting doctrine.

You have been saved by God from those who teach that there must be a time that one begins his race or the race he is running is no race at all? I doubt that that was God that brought you to believe other than that.

If the "truth of Orthodoxy" is as muddled as your presentation to the effect that there need be no beginning where the Holy Spirit starts His work in a believer and yet the one who was once so saved can lose that salvation (that they never had but was only working toward???) and that involvement with only your flavor of Christianity is the correct one and that preaching the gospel to the world unto a personal reception of it's truth for justification is nonsense and evil - I'll see your supposed truth and raise you one that isn't muddled at all but crystal clear and always has been since Paul talked to the Philippian jailer.

You must be talking about Protestants not evangelists. What you say makes no sense at all.

Look - my presentation in other posts as to why I would bother to preach the gospel to a person who was already involved in the Christian religion (perhaps like yourself for instance) was well reasoned, well presented and made complete sense. What is more it is based on actual observation of religious people and their lack of a starting point in a race they claimed to be running as well as scriptures I provided for you.

I showed you scriptures that told of the various tenses for salvation including the present tense and you still insist that the Christian walk only includes step 2 and 3.

That makes no sense at all. You are arguing either just out of pride or perhaps because you yourself have not begun the race you claim to be running.

You obviously think that you have come out from a false view of salvation and have entered a true one. That may be the case depending on what you believed before entering the Orthodox church. I wouldn't know.

But what I have given to you is the truth and what you have presented is a muddle of partial truths and untruths argued from a position of nonsense.

Hopefully someone here will read my scriptures and reasoning and see that where I have been coming from all along is valid and true.

Hopefully someone will see your race running without a beginning for what it is - nonsense.

Whatever the case - it's all been said. You have received God's Word on the matter and I am praying that it will not return to Him without accomplishing what He sent it out through me to accomplish. :wave:
What are you talking about when you say the race has no beginning? Of course it has a beginning. In faith coming into Christ's church and being baptized, being born anew, and hopefully growing in the faith and not leaving it.

I am talking about evangelicals, many of whom are also protestant. I don't understand how that doesn't make sense. You can't just say I am giving muddled truths without any evidence or explanation to the contrary. You conveniently ignore the scripture I am posting. I believed the same exact thing every southern Baptist evangelical believes. You keep talking about verb tenses of salvation but seem to ignore the context of the word salvation used. Any time it is used in the present tense it is used to speak of salvation from sin, not necessarily eternal. Salvation from the passions and salvation of life eternal are two different things. Paul distinguishes between the two.

As if Christ didn't build any church but yours. We attend fake churches I suppose?

There is only one church, and it didn't start in the 1800s with the latter revival movement. Call your congregation what you will but Christ founded one Church with the twelve apostles who set up a structure that has stood for 2000 years. People break away, people form their own sects- But there is only one Church, as there is only one truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Not David
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,169
1,377
75
Atlanta
✟109,031.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
You have your evangelical bias glasses on and of course you quoted, big deal it's still your deal how you think those verses are to be. Am I to quake in my boots because you lot take Scripture completely out of context and use them to your own devices and put your ideas on them?

Hush up please with making claims that you can not validate...

Or, put it in context. Show us what that passage on acceptable religion is to God means. Can you?

"Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this:
to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself
from being polluted by the world."
Ja 1:27
That's the kind of "religion" God approves of. You're saying that's not so?

I was saying that Christianity has a different emphasis.


The following is about Christianity. (Its not about following rituals and traditions.)

"Yet a time is coming and has now come when the true worshipers
will worship the Father in the Spirit and in truth, for they are
the kind of worshipers the Father seeks.
God is spirit, and his worshipers must worship in the Spirit and
in truth. Jn 4:23-24​
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.