Hi there,
So yes, I wonder if you see the simplicity of the distinction I am making here: "the beginning of time is four-dimensional".
If time were not four dimensional, there would be no room for space, in principle.
A big bang on the other hand, is a little of the beginning and a little of what it changed into: but not a transition in the nature of time, in principle, to begin with.
It may fill space, but a big bang does not change the nature of time, through that space: only beyond space in the four-dimension, can time begin (and begin to have an effect on what is "in" space - where you would find the big bang, if it was there).
I am spurious of the idea that the beginning needs an "object" on the basis of which it is "to begin" - the sleep of God, is about as early as anyone needs to go.
So yes, I wonder if you see the simplicity of the distinction I am making here: "the beginning of time is four-dimensional".
If time were not four dimensional, there would be no room for space, in principle.
A big bang on the other hand, is a little of the beginning and a little of what it changed into: but not a transition in the nature of time, in principle, to begin with.
It may fill space, but a big bang does not change the nature of time, through that space: only beyond space in the four-dimension, can time begin (and begin to have an effect on what is "in" space - where you would find the big bang, if it was there).
I am spurious of the idea that the beginning needs an "object" on the basis of which it is "to begin" - the sleep of God, is about as early as anyone needs to go.