Eight Foot Manchild
His Supreme Holy Correctfulness
- Sep 9, 2010
- 2,389
- 1,605
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
Because almost all beneficial mutations that allow for the small changes over time result in a net loss of genetic information
Nope. This is an ancient and necrotic creationist canard that anyone can debunk with a few minutes research.
so that eventually there is no more significant genetic information to bring about the large changes needed for macroevolution.
Macroevolution does not require 'large changes'. It is the cumulative effect of small changes. Just as walking a mile is the cumulative effect of taking one step at a time.
You have claimed to study evolution for forty years. What is your excuse for not knowing this?
The anthropic principle is a VERY well founded claim.
Except your claim is that the anthropic principle is evidence of a 'creator', which is absolutely not a 'very well founded claim'. As with all relevant fields of study, creationism in cosmology barely even qualifies as a fringe belief.
Last edited:
Upvote
0