You know what? Posting a bunch of links and expecting us to sort it out is not debate. Do your own research. And another thing is worrying me about this tactic of yours. At first this thread was all about proving premises with citations and quotes. Now it's just believing what the majority believe. A very dangerous and troubling turn I think.
I did my research, I paid attention in class, I graduated. I’m pointing you to the resources so that you can understand too. I’m sorry I can’t also understand it on your behalf, that is unfortunately left to you. But until you can accomplish that, you’re always going to be wrong and wondering why no one’s on your side.
I am normally alone in debate. I don't look at it as something I am doing wrong but rather something I am doing right, that no one is doing. I used to teach evangelism, and in a church of thousands, only half a dozen would show up to witness. I felt the exact same way back then. I never once thought because the majority of christians don't evangelize that it was wrong for me to do so. So I think your comment is somewhat inaccurate. As far as my gospel style, I don't know of any well known evangelists that do it the way I do. I preach somewhere between ray comfort and greg laurie. Ray uses apostasy doctrines, but claims they are false converts. The Bible says they could have been previously saved. Greg laurie believes that version of apostacy but does not preach it during gospel messages or crusades. So my particular version of the gospel is abrasive. But the abrasiveness is not to attract, but to detract. So that in hearing it, they would reject the message and not be converted. As to further God's will on this thread and others. I specifically word the message of the gospel in a way, that makes it repulsive to you. So that in hearing it you won't be saved. Your rejection of it, is exactly what I planned. It is God's will that those who are not at a right state of mind, would not be called. And those who are of a humble disposition, those who's minds are ready to hear and to obey His voice, it is only those who will come. So yes, by all means keep doing what you are doing. You guys are doing exactly what is expected. In your rejection of the Gospel, God too is glorified.
That's not actually true either. Math is built on unfounded assumptions too.
Well, this is a new one on me. I’ve never heard of any Christian intentionally trying to dissuade people from becoming Christians, or deconvert other Christians.
We had already rejected it before you arrived. Are you saying you hope to repel fellow Christians and people who are undecided, too? Because that’s the opposite of apologetics. You might not be allowed to do that here. It’s almost like trolling.
I know, it's for God's glory. I do this on purpose. As I have said. After all do you think God would accept a sinner that hates what he stands for? No, they are here to test the true believers, that is their only purpose. But I don't look at this debate as very difficult.
No, that's not happening I can assure you. This debate is simpler than simple to me. It's a walk in the park. Christians love it.
Vampire bats will regurgitate blood for unsuccessful members of their brood (whether directly related or not) after an unsuccessful night's hunt. Reciprocal altruism is not uncommon in social species
No, it's built on assumptions of axioms that you can't prove. The difficulty comes from defining '2' and '+' and '='.
No, that's not true. Cheating behind someone's back is commonly considered wrong by almost all folks because dishonesty is commonly considered wrong. However, "Adultery" encompasses more than just that. "Key Parties" are an example of people being completely fine with "Adultery".
