I was talking to someone else who said they can't see, hear, or feel God therefore He does not exist.
eyes can be deceiving. When you are walking on a hot street, and you see water on the road in a distance, it's a mirage. In a deep canyon, you can hear echo's of loud noises. But it's only one noise. So senses can be deceiving, and are not proof. Proof is something that is not possible. By the time you saw it with your eyes, journaled it in peer review, all the readers would have to trust your eye witness testimony that the tests came out accurate. Thats not proof.
In conclusion, the senses are not reliable. And even if they are reliable (and they aren't), why should someone else believe your senses? When communicating this truth to someone else, what may be a proof for you, all of a sudden is not proof. Because the other person needs to trust someone else's senses second hand. This is where all science fails. Even the hardest of sciences using the scientific method perfectly, is not proof. Most scientists realize this. Yet they ask for proof of christians viewpoints. it's hypocritical. The point is that nothing is provable. So basically faith is all there is. Some recognize that they live by faith, like Christians but most atheists don't realize they live by faith. Not just in some areas, but in everything they view as facts. (the only thing provable is math)